OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Азербайджан

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	189 890 (75.56 %)	1 493 (0.59 %)	191 383 (76.16 %)
last edit	59 591 (23.71 %)	328 (0.13 %)	59 919 (23.84 %)
v1 + last edit	249 481 (99.28 %)	1 821 (0.72 %)	251 302 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	15 544 (77.01 %)	56 (0.28 %)	15 600 (77.29 %)
last edit	4 565 (22.62 %)	19 (0.09 %)	4 584 (22.71 %)
v1 + last edit	20 109 (99.63 %)	75 (0.37 %)	20 184 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	473 (61.67 %)	(0.00 %)	473 (61.67 %)
last edit	294 (38.33 %)	0 (0.00 %)	294 (38.33 %)
v1 + last edit	767 (100.00 %)	0 (0.00 %)	767 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	216 (95.58 %)	10 (4.42 %)	226 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	95.58%		99.28%	99.63%	100.00%
Don-kun	552 178	1	58 918 (16.03 %)	42 158 (16.78 %)	3 348 (16.59 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2012-04-28
katpatuka	17 497	1	38 656 (10.52 %)	34 786 (13.84 %)	738 (3.66 %)	9 (1.17 %)	2011-10-13
hayk_yer	564 535	1	27 665 (7.53 %)	1 200 (0.48 %)	5 293 (26.22 %)		2012-02-26
ahaik	449 182	1	22 965 (6.25 %)	21 885 (8.71 %)	216 (1.07 %)		2012-02-29
nikusha	40 415	1	22 022 (5.99 %)	18 047 (7.18 %)	795 (3.94 %)		2011-10-23
gguj	72 133	1	16 174 (4.40 %)	14 579 (5.80 %)	319 (1.58 %)		2011-08-29
Anar777	608 592	1	15 379 (4.18 %)	10 514 (4.18 %)	969 (4.80 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2012-04-17
baxi	461 940	1	13 180 (3.59 %)	6 285 (2.50 %)	1 295 (6.42 %)	21 (2.74 %)	2012-04-29
ulil	16 881	1	13 127 (3.57 %)	9 862 (3.92 %)	653 (3.24 %)		2011-07-22
armvar	506 026	1	10 781 (2.93 %)	9 861 (3.92 %)	176 (0.87 %)	2 (0.26 %)	2012-01-10
Harut	475 344	1	9 118 (2.48 %)	7 373 (2.93 %)	341 (1.69 %)	2 (0.26 %)	2012-02-29
dbusse	149 876	1	8 122 (2.21 %)	6 057 (2.41 %)	413 (2.05 %)		2011-11-01
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	7 200 (1.96 %)			360 (46.94 %)	2011-10-30
tmtm	16 465	1	6 692 (1.82 %)	3 182 (1.27 %)	702 (3.48 %)		2011-06-26
munichosom	342 341	1	5 628 (1.53 %)	4 268 (1.70 %)	272 (1.35 %)		2011-12-07
Eugene	26 260	1	5 444 (1.48 %)	3 574 (1.42 %)	374 (1.85 %)		2010-12-18
SK53	84 681	1	5 232 (1.42 %)	4 437 (1.77 %)	159 (0.79 %)		2011-08-17
Xelgen	49 319	1	5 040 (1.37 %)	4 520 (1.80 %)	104 (0.52 %)		2011-07-18
Elcin	395 308	1	4 185 (1.14 %)	2 765 (1.10 %)	284 (1.41 %)		2011-01-27
Progressor	269 649	1	3 916 (1.07 %)	2 086 (0.83 %)	366 (1.81 %)		2011-09-29
Claudius Henrichs	18 069	1	3 881 (1.06 %)	2 156 (0.86 %)	341 (1.69 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2012-04-26
usom	337 115	1	3 862 (1.05 %)	2 912 (1.16 %)	190 (0.94 %)		2010-11-18
ghp2011	379 697	1	3 366 (0.92 %)	3 256 (1.30 %)	22 (0.11 %)		2010-12-27
vahegan	350 383	1	3 226 (0.88 %)	3 171 (1.26 %)	11 (0.05 %)		2010-09-27
esaulenka	336 354	1	2 633 (0.72 %)	2 343 (0.93 %)	38 (0.19 %)	5 (0.65 %)	2012-03-26
Hind	79 836	1	2 220 (0.60 %)			111 (14.47 %)	2012-01-21
kesler	13 908	1	2 201 (0.60 %)	1 326 (0.53 %)	167 (0.83 %)	2 (0.26 %)	2012-04-06
ppisa	22 793	1	2 195 (0.60 %)	1 595 (0.63 %)	120 (0.59 %)		2011-07-29
ffathead	215 700	1	2 064 (0.56 %)	1 559 (0.62 %)	101 (0.50 %)		2011-08-11
humboldtmap	71 486	1	2 015 (0.55 %)	1 765 (0.70 %)	50 (0.25 %)		2008-10-11
aighes	110 639	1	1 997 (0.54 %)	1 412 (0.56 %)	117 (0.58 %)		2012-02-08
Tiamlord	380 784	1	1 888 (0.51 %)	1 178 (0.47 %)	142 (0.70 %)		2011-09-13
vitalybaev	376 644	1	1 614 (0.44 %)	739 (0.29 %)	175 (0.87 %)		2011-06-19
bahnpirat	13 203	1	1 608 (0.44 %)	1 158 (0.46 %)	86 (0.43 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2011-05-30
HBR	64 805	1	1 520 (0.41 %)	1 165 (0.46 %)	71 (0.35 %)		2011-07-27
glebius	94 786	1	1 438 (0.39 %)	918 (0.37 %)	104 (0.52 %)		2011-02-28
moszkva ter	495 146	1	1 332 (0.36 %)	467 (0.19 %)	117 (0.58 %)	14 (1.83 %)	2012-05-03
JemWel	50 019	1	1 289 (0.35 %)	939 (0.37 %)	70 (0.35 %)		2008-07-19
Tubu	519 380	1	1 265 (0.34 %)	980 (0.39 %)	57 (0.28 %)		2011-09-16
Teddy80	109 035	1	1 152 (0.31 %)	927 (0.37 %)	45 (0.22 %)		2011-05-15
Raphink	47 924	1	990 (0.27 %)	835 (0.33 %)	31 (0.15 %)		2010-12-30
rendle W H S	59 758	-1	983 (0.27 %)	823 (0.33 %)	32 (0.16 %)		2009-07-01
f00bar	350 549	1	971 (0.26 %)	801 (0.32 %)	34 (0.17 %)		2011-10-18
masta	237 247	1	930 (0.25 %)	815 (0.32 %)	19 (0.09 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2012-02-13
jkjk W H S	23 543	-1	847 (0.23 %)	697 (0.28 %)	30 (0.15 %)		2011-03-05
loir	127 606	1	831 (0.23 %)	741 (0.29 %)	18 (0.09 %)		2011-11-02
parukhin	519 501	1	803 (0.22 %)	63 (0.03 %)	96 (0.48 %)	13 (1.69 %)	2012-03-17
fatim	81 514	1	796 (0.22 %)	341 (0.14 %)	91 (0.45 %)		2009-10-23
luch86	266 092	1	740 (0.20 %)			37 (4.82 %)	2012-04-20
Komяpa	29 320	1	687 (0.19 %)	12 (0.00 %)	135 (0.67 %)		2011-10-10
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	672 (0.18 %)	17 (0.01 %)	3 (0.01 %)	32 (4.17 %)	2011-10-28
Paper_	145 275	1	584 (0.16 %)	544 (0.22 %)	8 (0.04 %)		2011-08-21
RSergei	432 509	1	520 (0.14 %)			26 (3.39 %)	2012-05-02
bp0106	204 596	1	480 (0.13 %)			24 (3.13 %)	2012-04-22
Shahane	604 116	1	478 (0.13 %)	118 (0.05 %)	72 (0.36 %)		2012-02-13
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	402 (0.11 %)	102 (0.04 %)	16 (0.08 %)	11 (1.43 %)	2012-01-10

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

95.58%

99.28%

99.63%

100.00%

Don-kun

552 178

58 918 (16.03 %)

42 158 (16.78 %)

3 348 (16.59 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2012-04-28

katpatuka

17 497

38 656 (10.52 %)

34 786 (13.84 %)

738 (3.66 %)

9 (1.17 %)

2011-10-13

hayk_yer

564 535

27 665 (7.53 %)

1 200 (0.48 %)

5 293 (26.22 %)

2012-02-26

ahaik

449 182

22 965 (6.25 %)

21 885 (8.71 %)

216 (1.07 %)

2012-02-29

nikusha

40 415

22 022 (5.99 %)

18 047 (7.18 %)

795 (3.94 %)

2011-10-23

gguj

72 133

16 174 (4.40 %)

14 579 (5.80 %)

319 (1.58 %)

2011-08-29

Anar777

608 592

15 379 (4.18 %)

10 514 (4.18 %)

969 (4.80 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2012-04-17

baxi

461 940

13 180 (3.59 %)

6 285 (2.50 %)

1 295 (6.42 %)

21 (2.74 %)

2012-04-29

ulil

16 881

13 127 (3.57 %)

9 862 (3.92 %)

653 (3.24 %)

2011-07-22

armvar

506 026

10 781 (2.93 %)

9 861 (3.92 %)

176 (0.87 %)

2 (0.26 %)

2012-01-10

Harut

475 344

9 118 (2.48 %)

7 373 (2.93 %)

341 (1.69 %)

2 (0.26 %)

2012-02-29

dbusse

149 876

8 122 (2.21 %)

6 057 (2.41 %)

413 (2.05 %)

2011-11-01

Dennis Apter

180 462

7 200 (1.96 %)

360 (46.94 %)

2011-10-30

tmtm

16 465

6 692 (1.82 %)

3 182 (1.27 %)

702 (3.48 %)

2011-06-26

munichosom

342 341

5 628 (1.53 %)

4 268 (1.70 %)

272 (1.35 %)

2011-12-07

Eugene

26 260

5 444 (1.48 %)

3 574 (1.42 %)

374 (1.85 %)

2010-12-18

SK53

84 681

5 232 (1.42 %)

4 437 (1.77 %)

159 (0.79 %)

2011-08-17

Xelgen

49 319

5 040 (1.37 %)

4 520 (1.80 %)

104 (0.52 %)

2011-07-18

Elcin

395 308

4 185 (1.14 %)

2 765 (1.10 %)

284 (1.41 %)

2011-01-27

Progressor

269 649

3 916 (1.07 %)

2 086 (0.83 %)

366 (1.81 %)

2011-09-29

Claudius Henrichs

18 069

3 881 (1.06 %)

2 156 (0.86 %)

341 (1.69 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2012-04-26

usom

337 115

3 862 (1.05 %)

2 912 (1.16 %)

190 (0.94 %)

2010-11-18

ghp2011

379 697

3 366 (0.92 %)

3 256 (1.30 %)

22 (0.11 %)

2010-12-27

vahegan

350 383

3 226 (0.88 %)

3 171 (1.26 %)

11 (0.05 %)

2010-09-27

esaulenka

336 354

2 633 (0.72 %)

2 343 (0.93 %)

38 (0.19 %)

5 (0.65 %)

2012-03-26

Hind

79 836

2 220 (0.60 %)

111 (14.47 %)

2012-01-21

kesler

13 908

2 201 (0.60 %)

1 326 (0.53 %)

167 (0.83 %)

2 (0.26 %)

2012-04-06

ppisa

22 793

2 195 (0.60 %)

1 595 (0.63 %)

120 (0.59 %)

2011-07-29

ffathead

215 700

2 064 (0.56 %)

1 559 (0.62 %)

101 (0.50 %)

2011-08-11

humboldtmap

71 486

2 015 (0.55 %)

1 765 (0.70 %)

50 (0.25 %)

2008-10-11

aighes

110 639

1 997 (0.54 %)

1 412 (0.56 %)

117 (0.58 %)

2012-02-08

Tiamlord

380 784

1 888 (0.51 %)

1 178 (0.47 %)

142 (0.70 %)

2011-09-13

vitalybaev

376 644

1 614 (0.44 %)

739 (0.29 %)

175 (0.87 %)

2011-06-19

bahnpirat

13 203

1 608 (0.44 %)

1 158 (0.46 %)

86 (0.43 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2011-05-30

HBR

64 805

1 520 (0.41 %)

1 165 (0.46 %)

71 (0.35 %)

2011-07-27

glebius

94 786

1 438 (0.39 %)

918 (0.37 %)

104 (0.52 %)

2011-02-28

moszkva ter

495 146

1 332 (0.36 %)

467 (0.19 %)

117 (0.58 %)

14 (1.83 %)

2012-05-03

JemWel

50 019

1 289 (0.35 %)

939 (0.37 %)

70 (0.35 %)

2008-07-19

Tubu

519 380

1 265 (0.34 %)

980 (0.39 %)

57 (0.28 %)

2011-09-16

Teddy80

109 035

1 152 (0.31 %)

927 (0.37 %)

45 (0.22 %)

2011-05-15

Raphink

47 924

990 (0.27 %)

835 (0.33 %)

31 (0.15 %)

2010-12-30

rendle

W H S

59 758

-1

983 (0.27 %)

823 (0.33 %)

32 (0.16 %)

2009-07-01

f00bar

350 549

971 (0.26 %)

801 (0.32 %)

34 (0.17 %)

2011-10-18

masta

237 247

930 (0.25 %)

815 (0.32 %)

19 (0.09 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2012-02-13

jkjk

W H S

23 543

-1

847 (0.23 %)

697 (0.28 %)

30 (0.15 %)

2011-03-05

loir

127 606

831 (0.23 %)

741 (0.29 %)

18 (0.09 %)

2011-11-02

parukhin

519 501

803 (0.22 %)

63 (0.03 %)

96 (0.48 %)

13 (1.69 %)

2012-03-17

fatim

81 514

796 (0.22 %)

341 (0.14 %)

91 (0.45 %)

2009-10-23

luch86

266 092

740 (0.20 %)

37 (4.82 %)

2012-04-20

Komяpa

29 320

687 (0.19 %)

12 (0.00 %)

135 (0.67 %)

2011-10-10

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

672 (0.18 %)

17 (0.01 %)

3 (0.01 %)

32 (4.17 %)

2011-10-28

Paper_

145 275

584 (0.16 %)

544 (0.22 %)

8 (0.04 %)

2011-08-21

RSergei

432 509

520 (0.14 %)

26 (3.39 %)

2012-05-02

bp0106

204 596

480 (0.13 %)

24 (3.13 %)

2012-04-22

Shahane

604 116

478 (0.13 %)

118 (0.05 %)

72 (0.36 %)

2012-02-13

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

402 (0.11 %)

102 (0.04 %)

16 (0.08 %)

11 (1.43 %)

2012-01-10

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.