OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Киргизия

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-09-05, archive: 2011-08-29, 2011-08-22, 2011-08-15, 2011-08-09, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1178 900 (76.53 %)325 (0.14 %)179 225 (76.67 %)
last edit53 691 (22.97 %)837 (0.36 %)54 528 (23.33 %)
v1 + last edit232 591 (99.50 %)1 162 (0.50 %)233 753 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v114 874 (60.73 %)10 (0.04 %)14 884 (60.77 %)
last edit9 594 (39.17 %)16 (0.07 %)9 610 (39.23 %)
v1 + last edit24 468 (99.89 %)26 (0.11 %)24 494 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v163 (52.50 %) (0.00 %)63 (52.50 %)
last edit57 (47.50 %)0 (0.00 %)57 (47.50 %)
v1 + last edit120 (100.00 %)0 (0.00 %)120 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 146 (90.68 %)15 (9.32 %)161 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):90.68% 99.50%99.89%100.00% 
RastaM132 6271144 289 (40.23 %)91 544 (39.16 %)10 289 (42.01 %)65 (54.17 %)2011-09-01
katpatuka17 497137 937 (10.58 %)35 237 (15.07 %)512 (2.09 %)7 (5.83 %)2011-03-03
ahmster178 790136 160 (10.08 %)16 545 (7.08 %)3 871 (15.80 %)13 (10.83 %)2010-08-28
jamesks2 500127 385 (7.64 %)24 365 (10.42 %)604 (2.47 %) 2011-07-14
roman1985427 882112 910 (3.60 %)4 960 (2.12 %)1 586 (6.48 %)1 (0.83 %)2011-04-02
FredB1 626111 438 (3.19 %)5 613 (2.40 %)1 153 (4.71 %)3 (2.50 %)2010-10-16
skyer129 859111 120 (3.10 %)6 360 (2.72 %)952 (3.89 %) 2011-08-05
CAJAX51 40218 099 (2.26 %)5 199 (2.22 %)580 (2.37 %) 2010-11-15
Claudius Henrichs18 06916 472 (1.80 %)4 782 (2.05 %)338 (1.38 %) 2010-12-15
OPerivar51 32415 181 (1.44 %)2 881 (1.23 %)456 (1.86 %)1 (0.83 %)2010-03-25
SSD370 67314 761 (1.33 %)2 516 (1.08 %)445 (1.82 %)1 (0.83 %)2011-02-08
MichaelCollinson30813 878 (1.08 %)3 248 (1.39 %)126 (0.51 %) 2010-06-19
cMartin128 28713 357 (0.94 %)1 817 (0.78 %)284 (1.16 %)6 (5.00 %)2010-08-10
LarryMMMTT198 07213 285 (0.92 %)2 750 (1.18 %)103 (0.42 %)1 (0.83 %)2011-04-16
florisje2 40712 858 (0.80 %)2 088 (0.89 %)154 (0.63 %) 2010-08-04
aude12 05512 604 (0.73 %)1 414 (0.60 %)230 (0.94 %)2 (1.67 %)2010-08-06
quarksteilchen45 51112 488 (0.69 %)2 198 (0.94 %)58 (0.24 %) 2009-09-12
woodpeck5 16411 949 (0.54 %)1 464 (0.63 %)97 (0.40 %) 2008-09-12
maning1 41711 836 (0.51 %)1 621 (0.69 %)43 (0.18 %) 2010-08-06
shafr261 62011 778 (0.50 %)1 658 (0.71 %)24 (0.10 %) 2010-09-28
apollo253 25111 644 (0.46 %)914 (0.39 %)146 (0.60 %) 2010-05-12
cquest158 82611 606 (0.45 %)1 321 (0.57 %)57 (0.23 %) 2010-08-04
glebius94 78611 425 (0.40 %)55 (0.02 %)274 (1.12 %) 2011-04-09
stasch456 02811 388 (0.39 %)1 023 (0.44 %)73 (0.30 %) 2011-07-26
EyeOnNet509 94211 055 (0.29 %)585 (0.25 %)94 (0.38 %) 2011-09-01
Jano John Akim Franke42 19111 046 (0.29 %)826 (0.35 %)44 (0.18 %) 2010-12-13
flamed37 12511 044 (0.29 %)769 (0.33 %)55 (0.22 %) 2009-11-20
rid85 1871975 (0.27 %)20 (0.01 %)191 (0.78 %) 2010-09-06
LRoman170 9941967 (0.27 %)457 (0.20 %)102 (0.42 %) 2011-04-30
Ярослав Глушков239 6561954 (0.27 %)584 (0.25 %)74 (0.30 %) 2010-03-20
lvmp3391 5621899 (0.25 %)384 (0.16 %)99 (0.40 %)1 (0.83 %)2011-07-27
Garpul294 2241810 (0.23 %)630 (0.27 %)24 (0.10 %)3 (2.50 %)2011-09-02
davespod69 1931795 (0.22 %)60 (0.03 %)147 (0.60 %) 2010-08-09
aerserg238 1101788 (0.22 %)438 (0.19 %)70 (0.29 %) 2011-08-31
user_53595 3591711 (0.20 %)1 (0.00 %)142 (0.58 %) 2011-07-21
Aleksandr Dezhin12 4941705 (0.20 %) 129 (0.53 %)3 (2.50 %)2011-08-10
PART371 2511606 (0.17 %)81 (0.03 %)105 (0.43 %) 2011-04-24
W  H  S
154 4260589 (0.16 %)559 (0.24 %)6 (0.02 %) 2010-02-04

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!