OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Киргизия

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-10-24, archive: 2011-10-12, 2011-09-26, 2011-09-12, 2011-09-05, 2011-08-29, 2011-08-22, 2011-08-15, 2011-08-09, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1187 219 (76.94 %)295 (0.12 %)187 514 (77.06 %)
last edit55 104 (22.65 %)709 (0.29 %)55 813 (22.94 %)
v1 + last edit242 323 (99.59 %)1 004 (0.41 %)243 327 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v115 604 (60.88 %)5 (0.02 %)15 609 (60.90 %)
last edit10 010 (39.05 %)13 (0.05 %)10 023 (39.10 %)
v1 + last edit25 614 (99.93 %)18 (0.07 %)25 632 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v167 (53.60 %) (0.00 %)67 (53.60 %)
last edit58 (46.40 %)0 (0.00 %)58 (46.40 %)
v1 + last edit125 (100.00 %)0 (0.00 %)125 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 150 (91.46 %)14 (8.54 %)164 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):91.46% 99.59%99.93%100.00% 
RastaM132 6271158 834 (42.47 %)98 864 (40.63 %)11 722 (45.73 %)68 (54.40 %)2011-10-23
katpatuka17 497140 706 (10.88 %)37 716 (15.50 %)538 (2.10 %)15 (12.00 %)2011-10-14
ahmster178 790135 785 (9.57 %)16 545 (6.80 %)3 796 (14.81 %)13 (10.40 %)2010-08-28
jamesks2 500127 390 (7.32 %)24 275 (9.98 %)619 (2.41 %)1 (0.80 %)2011-09-16
roman1985427 882112 181 (3.26 %)4 611 (1.89 %)1 510 (5.89 %)1 (0.80 %)2011-04-02
FredB1 626110 894 (2.91 %)5 614 (2.31 %)1 044 (4.07 %)3 (2.40 %)2011-09-07
skyer129 85919 853 (2.63 %)5 773 (2.37 %)816 (3.18 %) 2011-09-28
CAJAX51 40217 574 (2.03 %)4 984 (2.05 %)518 (2.02 %) 2010-11-15
Claudius Henrichs18 06916 418 (1.72 %)4 778 (1.96 %)328 (1.28 %) 2010-12-15
OPerivar51 32415 017 (1.34 %)2 847 (1.17 %)430 (1.68 %)1 (0.80 %)2010-03-25
SSD370 67314 751 (1.27 %)2 516 (1.03 %)443 (1.73 %)1 (0.80 %)2011-02-08
MichaelCollinson30813 878 (1.04 %)3 248 (1.33 %)126 (0.49 %) 2010-06-19
cMartin128 28713 357 (0.90 %)1 817 (0.75 %)284 (1.11 %)6 (4.80 %)2010-08-10
LarryMMMTT198 07213 257 (0.87 %)2 732 (1.12 %)101 (0.39 %)1 (0.80 %)2011-04-16
florisje2 40712 858 (0.76 %)2 088 (0.86 %)154 (0.60 %) 2010-08-04
aude12 05512 604 (0.70 %)1 414 (0.58 %)230 (0.90 %)2 (1.60 %)2010-08-06
quarksteilchen45 51112 447 (0.65 %)2 172 (0.89 %)55 (0.21 %) 2009-09-12
woodpeck5 16411 882 (0.50 %)1 432 (0.59 %)90 (0.35 %) 2008-09-12
maning1 41711 801 (0.48 %)1 621 (0.67 %)36 (0.14 %) 2010-08-06
shafr261 62011 778 (0.48 %)1 658 (0.68 %)24 (0.09 %) 2010-09-28
cquest158 82611 601 (0.43 %)1 321 (0.54 %)56 (0.22 %) 2010-08-04
apollo253 25111 555 (0.42 %)880 (0.36 %)135 (0.53 %) 2010-05-12
EyeOnNet509 94211 423 (0.38 %)843 (0.35 %)116 (0.45 %) 2011-10-23
glebius94 78611 390 (0.37 %)55 (0.02 %)267 (1.04 %) 2011-04-09
stasch456 02811 350 (0.36 %)990 (0.41 %)72 (0.28 %) 2011-07-26
Garpul294 22411 251 (0.33 %)941 (0.39 %)46 (0.18 %)4 (3.20 %)2011-10-12
gfox522 83111 205 (0.32 %)30 (0.01 %)235 (0.92 %) 2011-09-24
Marych73349 64511 202 (0.32 %)652 (0.27 %)102 (0.40 %)2 (1.60 %)2011-10-06
Jano John Akim Franke42 19111 030 (0.28 %)820 (0.34 %)42 (0.16 %) 2010-12-13
flamed37 1251998 (0.27 %)748 (0.31 %)50 (0.20 %) 2009-11-20
LRoman170 9941929 (0.25 %)449 (0.18 %)96 (0.37 %) 2011-04-30
rid85 1871925 (0.25 %)20 (0.01 %)181 (0.71 %) 2010-09-06
lvmp3391 5621887 (0.24 %)382 (0.16 %)97 (0.38 %)1 (0.80 %)2011-07-27
aerserg238 1101755 (0.20 %)415 (0.17 %)68 (0.27 %) 2011-08-31
user_53595 3591701 (0.19 %)1 (0.00 %)140 (0.55 %) 2011-07-21
Aleksandr Dezhin12 4941645 (0.17 %) 129 (0.50 %) 2011-08-10
davespod69 1931640 (0.17 %)60 (0.02 %)116 (0.45 %) 2010-08-09
W  H  S
154 4260579 (0.15 %)559 (0.23 %)4 (0.02 %) 2010-02-04
PART371 2511543 (0.15 %)68 (0.03 %)95 (0.37 %) 2011-04-24

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!