OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Киргизия

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-11-09, archive: 2011-10-12, 2011-09-26, 2011-09-12, 2011-09-05, 2011-08-29, 2011-08-22, 2011-08-15, 2011-08-09, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1189 263 (77.06 %)295 (0.12 %)189 558 (77.18 %)
last edit55 328 (22.53 %)708 (0.29 %)56 036 (22.82 %)
v1 + last edit244 591 (99.59 %)1 003 (0.41 %)245 594 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v115 728 (60.94 %)5 (0.02 %)15 733 (60.96 %)
last edit10 064 (38.99 %)13 (0.05 %)10 077 (39.04 %)
v1 + last edit25 792 (99.93 %)18 (0.07 %)25 810 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v167 (53.60 %) (0.00 %)67 (53.60 %)
last edit58 (46.40 %)0 (0.00 %)58 (46.40 %)
v1 + last edit125 (100.00 %)0 (0.00 %)125 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 152 (91.57 %)14 (8.43 %)166 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):91.57% 99.59%99.93%100.00% 
RastaM132 6271159 934 (42.41 %)99 459 (40.50 %)11 831 (45.84 %)66 (52.80 %)2011-10-30
katpatuka17 497140 590 (10.76 %)37 715 (15.36 %)523 (2.03 %)13 (10.40 %)2011-10-13
ahmster178 790135 781 (9.49 %)16 541 (6.74 %)3 796 (14.71 %)13 (10.40 %)2010-08-28
jamesks2 500127 196 (7.21 %)24 126 (9.82 %)610 (2.36 %)1 (0.80 %)2011-09-16
roman1985427 882112 166 (3.23 %)4 611 (1.88 %)1 507 (5.84 %)1 (0.80 %)2011-04-02
FredB1 626110 894 (2.89 %)5 614 (2.29 %)1 044 (4.04 %)3 (2.40 %)2011-09-07
skyer129 85919 853 (2.61 %)5 773 (2.35 %)816 (3.16 %) 2011-09-28
CAJAX51 40217 562 (2.01 %)4 977 (2.03 %)517 (2.00 %) 2010-11-15
Claudius Henrichs18 06916 417 (1.70 %)4 777 (1.95 %)328 (1.27 %) 2010-12-15
OPerivar51 32415 016 (1.33 %)2 846 (1.16 %)430 (1.67 %)1 (0.80 %)2010-03-25
SSD370 67314 741 (1.26 %)2 516 (1.02 %)441 (1.71 %)1 (0.80 %)2011-02-08
MichaelCollinson30813 878 (1.03 %)3 248 (1.32 %)126 (0.49 %) 2010-06-19
cMartin128 28713 357 (0.89 %)1 817 (0.74 %)284 (1.10 %)6 (4.80 %)2010-08-10
LarryMMMTT198 07213 236 (0.86 %)2 721 (1.11 %)99 (0.38 %)1 (0.80 %)2011-04-16
florisje2 40712 858 (0.76 %)2 088 (0.85 %)154 (0.60 %) 2010-08-04
aude12 05512 604 (0.69 %)1 414 (0.58 %)230 (0.89 %)2 (1.60 %)2010-08-06
quarksteilchen45 51112 445 (0.65 %)2 170 (0.88 %)55 (0.21 %) 2009-09-12
woodpeck5 16411 882 (0.50 %)1 432 (0.58 %)90 (0.35 %) 2008-09-12
il72505 77511 826 (0.48 %)1 521 (0.62 %)61 (0.24 %) 2011-10-30
maning1 41711 801 (0.48 %)1 621 (0.66 %)36 (0.14 %) 2010-08-06
shafr261 62011 778 (0.47 %)1 658 (0.68 %)24 (0.09 %) 2010-09-28
EyeOnNet509 94211 723 (0.46 %)1 073 (0.44 %)130 (0.50 %) 2011-10-26
cquest158 82611 601 (0.42 %)1 321 (0.54 %)56 (0.22 %) 2010-08-04
apollo253 25111 555 (0.41 %)880 (0.36 %)135 (0.52 %) 2010-05-12
glebius94 78611 369 (0.36 %)54 (0.02 %)263 (1.02 %) 2011-04-09
stasch456 02811 350 (0.36 %)990 (0.40 %)72 (0.28 %) 2011-07-26
Marych73349 64511 265 (0.34 %)655 (0.27 %)106 (0.41 %)4 (3.20 %)2011-11-07
Garpul294 22411 251 (0.33 %)941 (0.38 %)46 (0.18 %)4 (3.20 %)2011-10-12
gfox522 83111 205 (0.32 %)30 (0.01 %)235 (0.91 %) 2011-09-24
Jano John Akim Franke42 19111 025 (0.27 %)820 (0.33 %)41 (0.16 %) 2010-12-13
flamed37 1251998 (0.26 %)748 (0.30 %)50 (0.19 %) 2009-11-20
rid85 1871925 (0.25 %)20 (0.01 %)181 (0.70 %) 2010-09-06
LRoman170 9941919 (0.24 %)444 (0.18 %)95 (0.37 %) 2011-04-30
lvmp3391 5621887 (0.24 %)382 (0.16 %)97 (0.38 %)1 (0.80 %)2011-07-27
aerserg238 1101753 (0.20 %)413 (0.17 %)68 (0.26 %) 2011-08-31
user_53595 3591691 (0.18 %)1 (0.00 %)138 (0.53 %) 2011-07-21
Aleksandr Dezhin12 4941645 (0.17 %) 129 (0.50 %) 2011-08-10
davespod69 1931640 (0.17 %)60 (0.02 %)116 (0.45 %) 2010-08-09
W  H  S
154 4260579 (0.15 %)559 (0.23 %)4 (0.02 %) 2010-02-04
PART371 2511543 (0.14 %)68 (0.03 %)95 (0.37 %) 2011-04-24

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!