OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Киргизия

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	194 354 (77.27 %)	295 (0.12 %)	194 649 (77.39 %)
last edit	56 182 (22.34 %)	692 (0.28 %)	56 874 (22.61 %)
v1 + last edit	250 536 (99.61 %)	987 (0.39 %)	251 523 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	15 896 (60.79 %)	5 (0.02 %)	15 901 (60.81 %)
last edit	10 235 (39.14 %)	11 (0.04 %)	10 246 (39.19 %)
v1 + last edit	26 131 (99.94 %)	16 (0.06 %)	26 147 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	67 (53.17 %)	(0.00 %)	67 (53.17 %)
last edit	59 (46.83 %)	0 (0.00 %)	59 (46.83 %)
v1 + last edit	126 (100.00 %)	0 (0.00 %)	126 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	171 (92.43 %)	14 (7.57 %)	185 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	92.43%		99.61%	99.94%	100.00%
RastaM	132 627	1	160 540 (41.72 %)	99 700 (39.64 %)	11 908 (45.54 %)	65 (51.59 %)	2012-01-25
katpatuka	17 497	1	39 871 (10.36 %)	37 206 (14.79 %)	501 (1.92 %)	8 (6.35 %)	2011-10-13
ahmster	178 790	1	35 770 (9.30 %)	16 540 (6.58 %)	3 794 (14.51 %)	13 (10.32 %)	2010-08-28
jamesks	2 500	1	26 497 (6.89 %)	23 797 (9.46 %)	536 (2.05 %)	1 (0.79 %)	2011-09-16
roman1985	427 882	1	12 122 (3.15 %)	4 602 (1.83 %)	1 500 (5.74 %)	1 (0.79 %)	2011-04-02
FredB	1 626	1	10 859 (2.82 %)	5 599 (2.23 %)	1 040 (3.98 %)	3 (2.38 %)	2011-09-07
skyer	129 859	1	9 646 (2.51 %)	5 591 (2.22 %)	811 (3.10 %)		2011-12-09
CAJAX	51 402	1	7 538 (1.96 %)	4 973 (1.98 %)	513 (1.96 %)		2010-11-15
Claudius Henrichs	18 069	1	6 388 (1.66 %)	4 773 (1.90 %)	323 (1.24 %)		2010-12-15
OPerivar	51 324	1	5 016 (1.30 %)	2 846 (1.13 %)	430 (1.64 %)	1 (0.79 %)	2010-03-25
SSD	370 673	1	4 643 (1.21 %)	2 508 (1.00 %)	423 (1.62 %)	1 (0.79 %)	2011-02-08
il72	505 775	1	3 885 (1.01 %)	3 200 (1.27 %)	137 (0.52 %)		2012-01-24
MichaelCollinson	308	1	3 847 (1.00 %)	3 247 (1.29 %)	120 (0.46 %)		2010-06-19
cMartin	128 287	1	3 357 (0.87 %)	1 817 (0.72 %)	284 (1.09 %)	6 (4.76 %)	2010-08-10
LarryMMMTT	198 072	1	3 193 (0.83 %)	2 718 (1.08 %)	91 (0.35 %)	1 (0.79 %)	2011-04-16
florisje	2 407	1	2 853 (0.74 %)	2 088 (0.83 %)	153 (0.59 %)		2010-08-04
Garpul	294 224	1	2 617 (0.68 %)	1 557 (0.62 %)	200 (0.76 %)	3 (2.38 %)	2012-01-21
aude	12 055	1	2 587 (0.67 %)	1 412 (0.56 %)	227 (0.87 %)	2 (1.59 %)	2010-08-06
quarksteilchen	45 511	1	2 445 (0.64 %)	2 170 (0.86 %)	55 (0.21 %)		2009-09-12
il26	569 778	1	1 968 (0.51 %)	1 823 (0.72 %)	29 (0.11 %)		2012-01-08
chnav	248 768	1	1 879 (0.49 %)	1 379 (0.55 %)	84 (0.32 %)	4 (3.17 %)	2011-12-13
woodpeck	5 164	1	1 858 (0.48 %)	1 423 (0.57 %)	87 (0.33 %)		2008-09-12
maning	1 417	1	1 791 (0.47 %)	1 621 (0.64 %)	34 (0.13 %)		2010-08-06
shafr	261 620	1	1 778 (0.46 %)	1 658 (0.66 %)	24 (0.09 %)		2010-09-28
EyeOnNet	509 942	1	1 707 (0.44 %)	1 072 (0.43 %)	127 (0.49 %)		2011-10-26
cquest	158 826	1	1 600 (0.42 %)	1 320 (0.52 %)	56 (0.21 %)		2010-08-04
Marych73	349 645	1	1 539 (0.40 %)	914 (0.36 %)	93 (0.36 %)	8 (6.35 %)	2012-01-17
sve200800	545 084	1	1 536 (0.40 %)	1 071 (0.43 %)	93 (0.36 %)		2012-01-09
apollo	253 251	1	1 514 (0.39 %)	874 (0.35 %)	128 (0.49 %)		2010-05-12
stasch	456 028	1	1 350 (0.35 %)	990 (0.39 %)	72 (0.28 %)		2011-07-26
glebius	94 786	1	1 261 (0.33 %)	26 (0.01 %)	247 (0.94 %)		2011-04-09
gfox	522 831	1	1 195 (0.31 %)	30 (0.01 %)	233 (0.89 %)		2011-09-24
Jano John Akim Franke	42 191	1	1 025 (0.27 %)	820 (0.33 %)	41 (0.16 %)		2010-12-13
flamed	37 125	1	998 (0.26 %)	748 (0.30 %)	50 (0.19 %)		2009-11-20
rid	85 187	1	925 (0.24 %)	20 (0.01 %)	181 (0.69 %)		2010-09-06
LRoman	170 994	1	919 (0.24 %)	444 (0.18 %)	95 (0.36 %)		2011-04-30
lvmp3	391 562	1	887 (0.23 %)	382 (0.15 %)	97 (0.37 %)	1 (0.79 %)	2011-07-27
aerserg	238 110	1	742 (0.19 %)	412 (0.16 %)	66 (0.25 %)		2011-08-31
user_5359	5 359	1	681 (0.18 %)	1 (0.00 %)	136 (0.52 %)		2011-07-21
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	645 (0.17 %)		129 (0.49 %)		2011-08-10
davespod	69 193	1	640 (0.17 %)	60 (0.02 %)	116 (0.44 %)		2010-08-09
pavelvdovin W H S	154 426	0	563 (0.15 %)	543 (0.22 %)	4 (0.02 %)		2010-02-04
PART	371 251	1	543 (0.14 %)	68 (0.03 %)	95 (0.36 %)		2011-04-24

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

92.43%

99.61%

99.94%

100.00%

RastaM

132 627

160 540 (41.72 %)

99 700 (39.64 %)

11 908 (45.54 %)

65 (51.59 %)

2012-01-25

katpatuka

17 497

39 871 (10.36 %)

37 206 (14.79 %)

501 (1.92 %)

8 (6.35 %)

2011-10-13

ahmster

178 790

35 770 (9.30 %)

16 540 (6.58 %)

3 794 (14.51 %)

13 (10.32 %)

2010-08-28

jamesks

2 500

26 497 (6.89 %)

23 797 (9.46 %)

536 (2.05 %)

1 (0.79 %)

2011-09-16

roman1985

427 882

12 122 (3.15 %)

4 602 (1.83 %)

1 500 (5.74 %)

1 (0.79 %)

2011-04-02

FredB

1 626

10 859 (2.82 %)

5 599 (2.23 %)

1 040 (3.98 %)

3 (2.38 %)

2011-09-07

skyer

129 859

9 646 (2.51 %)

5 591 (2.22 %)

811 (3.10 %)

2011-12-09

CAJAX

51 402

7 538 (1.96 %)

4 973 (1.98 %)

513 (1.96 %)

2010-11-15

Claudius Henrichs

18 069

6 388 (1.66 %)

4 773 (1.90 %)

323 (1.24 %)

2010-12-15

OPerivar

51 324

5 016 (1.30 %)

2 846 (1.13 %)

430 (1.64 %)

1 (0.79 %)

2010-03-25

SSD

370 673

4 643 (1.21 %)

2 508 (1.00 %)

423 (1.62 %)

1 (0.79 %)

2011-02-08

il72

505 775

3 885 (1.01 %)

3 200 (1.27 %)

137 (0.52 %)

2012-01-24

MichaelCollinson

308

3 847 (1.00 %)

3 247 (1.29 %)

120 (0.46 %)

2010-06-19

cMartin

128 287

3 357 (0.87 %)

1 817 (0.72 %)

284 (1.09 %)

6 (4.76 %)

2010-08-10

LarryMMMTT

198 072

3 193 (0.83 %)

2 718 (1.08 %)

91 (0.35 %)

1 (0.79 %)

2011-04-16

florisje

2 407

2 853 (0.74 %)

2 088 (0.83 %)

153 (0.59 %)

2010-08-04

Garpul

294 224

2 617 (0.68 %)

1 557 (0.62 %)

200 (0.76 %)

3 (2.38 %)

2012-01-21

aude

12 055

2 587 (0.67 %)

1 412 (0.56 %)

227 (0.87 %)

2 (1.59 %)

2010-08-06

quarksteilchen

45 511

2 445 (0.64 %)

2 170 (0.86 %)

55 (0.21 %)

2009-09-12

il26

569 778

1 968 (0.51 %)

1 823 (0.72 %)

29 (0.11 %)

2012-01-08

chnav

248 768

1 879 (0.49 %)

1 379 (0.55 %)

84 (0.32 %)

4 (3.17 %)

2011-12-13

woodpeck

5 164

1 858 (0.48 %)

1 423 (0.57 %)

87 (0.33 %)

2008-09-12

maning

1 417

1 791 (0.47 %)

1 621 (0.64 %)

34 (0.13 %)

2010-08-06

shafr

261 620

1 778 (0.46 %)

1 658 (0.66 %)

24 (0.09 %)

2010-09-28

EyeOnNet

509 942

1 707 (0.44 %)

1 072 (0.43 %)

127 (0.49 %)

2011-10-26

cquest

158 826

1 600 (0.42 %)

1 320 (0.52 %)

56 (0.21 %)

2010-08-04

Marych73

349 645

1 539 (0.40 %)

914 (0.36 %)

93 (0.36 %)

8 (6.35 %)

2012-01-17

sve200800

545 084

1 536 (0.40 %)

1 071 (0.43 %)

93 (0.36 %)

2012-01-09

apollo

253 251

1 514 (0.39 %)

874 (0.35 %)

128 (0.49 %)

2010-05-12

stasch

456 028

1 350 (0.35 %)

990 (0.39 %)

72 (0.28 %)

2011-07-26

glebius

94 786

1 261 (0.33 %)

26 (0.01 %)

247 (0.94 %)

2011-04-09

gfox

522 831

1 195 (0.31 %)

30 (0.01 %)

233 (0.89 %)

2011-09-24

Jano John Akim Franke

42 191

1 025 (0.27 %)

820 (0.33 %)

41 (0.16 %)

2010-12-13

flamed

37 125

998 (0.26 %)

748 (0.30 %)

50 (0.19 %)

2009-11-20

rid

85 187

925 (0.24 %)

20 (0.01 %)

181 (0.69 %)

2010-09-06

LRoman

170 994

919 (0.24 %)

444 (0.18 %)

95 (0.36 %)

2011-04-30

lvmp3

391 562

887 (0.23 %)

382 (0.15 %)

97 (0.37 %)

1 (0.79 %)

2011-07-27

aerserg

238 110

742 (0.19 %)

412 (0.16 %)

66 (0.25 %)

2011-08-31

user_5359

5 359

681 (0.18 %)

1 (0.00 %)

136 (0.52 %)

2011-07-21

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

645 (0.17 %)

129 (0.49 %)

2011-08-10

davespod

69 193

640 (0.17 %)

60 (0.02 %)

116 (0.44 %)

2010-08-09

pavelvdovin

W H S

154 426

563 (0.15 %)

543 (0.22 %)

4 (0.02 %)

2010-02-04

PART

371 251

543 (0.14 %)

68 (0.03 %)

95 (0.36 %)

2011-04-24

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.