OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Амурская область

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	142 004 (88.72 %)	858 (0.54 %)	142 862 (89.26 %)
last edit	16 960 (10.60 %)	236 (0.15 %)	17 196 (10.74 %)
v1 + last edit	158 964 (99.32 %)	1 094 (0.68 %)	160 058 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	4 268 (62.21 %)	23 (0.34 %)	4 291 (62.54 %)
last edit	2 555 (37.24 %)	15 (0.22 %)	2 570 (37.46 %)
v1 + last edit	6 823 (99.45 %)	38 (0.55 %)	6 861 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	603 (77.01 %)	(0.00 %)	603 (77.01 %)
last edit	178 (22.73 %)	2 (0.26 %)	180 (22.99 %)
v1 + last edit	781 (99.74 %)	2 (0.26 %)	783 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	130 (95.59 %)	6 (4.41 %)	136 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	95.59%		99.32%	99.45%	99.74%
katpatuka	17 497	1	62 739 (29.87 %)	60 719 (37.94 %)	364 (5.31 %)	10 (1.28 %)	2011-04-20
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	18 832 (8.97 %)	18 567 (11.60 %)	21 (0.31 %)	8 (1.02 %)	2011-08-06
Lexan	469 275	1	15 090 (7.18 %)	11 490 (7.18 %)	720 (10.49 %)		2011-08-15
Crazy Demon	475 612	1	13 234 (6.30 %)	10 939 (6.83 %)	447 (6.52 %)	3 (0.38 %)	2011-06-28
colebatch	184 086	1	10 622 (5.06 %)	9 082 (5.67 %)	304 (4.43 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2011-07-10
AAlex	319 192	1	9 461 (4.50 %)	5 016 (3.13 %)	881 (12.84 %)	2 (0.26 %)	2011-08-17
Staccato	456 851	1	9 221 (4.39 %)	5 141 (3.21 %)	816 (11.89 %)		2011-08-26
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	7 740 (3.69 %)			387 (49.43 %)	2011-08-19
progserega	127 372	1	6 918 (3.29 %)	4 158 (2.60 %)	536 (7.81 %)	4 (0.51 %)	2011-08-28
AMDmi3	133 332	1	4 780 (2.28 %)	470 (0.29 %)	662 (9.65 %)	50 (6.39 %)	2011-08-16
art-zhitnik	457 425	1	3 899 (1.86 %)	2 189 (1.37 %)	342 (4.98 %)		2011-05-30
Oleg Yakovlev	121 744	1	2 715 (1.29 %)	1 535 (0.96 %)	228 (3.32 %)	2 (0.26 %)	2011-08-06
nioo	475 568	1	2 583 (1.23 %)	1 833 (1.15 %)	150 (2.19 %)		2011-08-20
Miroff	217 899	1	2 365 (1.13 %)	1 915 (1.20 %)	30 (0.44 %)	15 (1.92 %)	2011-08-16
humboldtmap	71 486	1	2 301 (1.10 %)	2 281 (1.43 %)	4 (0.06 %)		2009-02-17
Upliner	67 668	1	2 286 (1.09 %)	2 176 (1.36 %)	22 (0.32 %)		2009-05-24
Hind	79 836	1	2 200 (1.05 %)			110 (14.05 %)	2011-08-25
OldIvantey	314 211	1	2 151 (1.02 %)	1 846 (1.15 %)	57 (0.83 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2011-05-01
dfcz55	414 565	1	2 034 (0.97 %)	1 514 (0.95 %)	100 (1.46 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2011-06-05
MichaelCollinson	308	1	1 929 (0.92 %)	1 889 (1.18 %)	8 (0.12 %)		2009-01-09
Nightmare04	481 164	1	1 847 (0.88 %)	842 (0.53 %)	201 (2.93 %)		2011-07-25
Anatoli	380 265	1	1 806 (0.86 %)	1 396 (0.87 %)	70 (1.02 %)	3 (0.38 %)	2011-08-27
_kendell	68 934	1	1 796 (0.86 %)	1 556 (0.97 %)	36 (0.52 %)	3 (0.38 %)	2011-02-18
LexIgnatov	316 868	1	1 768 (0.84 %)	1 163 (0.73 %)	121 (1.76 %)		2010-10-29
liosha	11 132	1	1 615 (0.77 %)	1 585 (0.99 %)	6 (0.09 %)		2009-02-14
Obscured	345 918	1	1 449 (0.69 %)	1 414 (0.88 %)	7 (0.10 %)		2011-03-12
SMS_amur	448 457	1	1 415 (0.67 %)	975 (0.61 %)	88 (1.28 %)		2011-05-06
Nikolya	333 584	1	1 335 (0.64 %)	1 025 (0.64 %)	62 (0.90 %)		2010-12-07
Chumes	438 413	1	1 080 (0.51 %)	665 (0.42 %)	83 (1.21 %)		2011-04-19
Dmi3y W H S	280 151	0	933 (0.44 %)	768 (0.48 %)	33 (0.48 %)		2010-06-09
mpioner	231 306	1	846 (0.40 %)	636 (0.40 %)	42 (0.61 %)		2011-06-15
dimon	109 952	1	805 (0.38 %)	755 (0.47 %)	10 (0.15 %)		2010-07-29
luch86	266 092	1	760 (0.36 %)			38 (4.85 %)	2011-05-03
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	680 (0.32 %)			34 (4.34 %)	2011-07-23
Belacqua	261 640	1	626 (0.30 %)	596 (0.37 %)	6 (0.09 %)		2010-04-19
Ivan Komarov	69 864	1	608 (0.29 %)	598 (0.37 %)	2 (0.03 %)		2009-07-30
bp0106	204 596	1	500 (0.24 %)			25 (3.19 %)	2011-04-02
lvv1960	135 138	1	260 (0.12 %)			13 (1.66 %)	2011-08-25

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

95.59%

99.32%

99.45%

99.74%

katpatuka

17 497

62 739 (29.87 %)

60 719 (37.94 %)

364 (5.31 %)

10 (1.28 %)

2011-04-20

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

18 832 (8.97 %)

18 567 (11.60 %)

21 (0.31 %)

8 (1.02 %)

2011-08-06

Lexan

469 275

15 090 (7.18 %)

11 490 (7.18 %)

720 (10.49 %)

2011-08-15

Crazy Demon

475 612

13 234 (6.30 %)

10 939 (6.83 %)

447 (6.52 %)

3 (0.38 %)

2011-06-28

colebatch

184 086

10 622 (5.06 %)

9 082 (5.67 %)

304 (4.43 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2011-07-10

AAlex

319 192

9 461 (4.50 %)

5 016 (3.13 %)

881 (12.84 %)

2 (0.26 %)

2011-08-17

Staccato

456 851

9 221 (4.39 %)

5 141 (3.21 %)

816 (11.89 %)

2011-08-26

Dennis Apter

180 462

7 740 (3.69 %)

387 (49.43 %)

2011-08-19

progserega

127 372

6 918 (3.29 %)

4 158 (2.60 %)

536 (7.81 %)

4 (0.51 %)

2011-08-28

AMDmi3

133 332

4 780 (2.28 %)

470 (0.29 %)

662 (9.65 %)

50 (6.39 %)

2011-08-16

art-zhitnik

457 425

3 899 (1.86 %)

2 189 (1.37 %)

342 (4.98 %)

2011-05-30

Oleg Yakovlev

121 744

2 715 (1.29 %)

1 535 (0.96 %)

228 (3.32 %)

2 (0.26 %)

2011-08-06

nioo

475 568

2 583 (1.23 %)

1 833 (1.15 %)

150 (2.19 %)

2011-08-20

Miroff

217 899

2 365 (1.13 %)

1 915 (1.20 %)

30 (0.44 %)

15 (1.92 %)

2011-08-16

humboldtmap

71 486

2 301 (1.10 %)

2 281 (1.43 %)

4 (0.06 %)

2009-02-17

Upliner

67 668

2 286 (1.09 %)

2 176 (1.36 %)

22 (0.32 %)

2009-05-24

Hind

79 836

2 200 (1.05 %)

110 (14.05 %)

2011-08-25

OldIvantey

314 211

2 151 (1.02 %)

1 846 (1.15 %)

57 (0.83 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2011-05-01

dfcz55

414 565

2 034 (0.97 %)

1 514 (0.95 %)

100 (1.46 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2011-06-05

MichaelCollinson

308

1 929 (0.92 %)

1 889 (1.18 %)

8 (0.12 %)

2009-01-09

Nightmare04

481 164

1 847 (0.88 %)

842 (0.53 %)

201 (2.93 %)

2011-07-25

Anatoli

380 265

1 806 (0.86 %)

1 396 (0.87 %)

70 (1.02 %)

3 (0.38 %)

2011-08-27

_kendell

68 934

1 796 (0.86 %)

1 556 (0.97 %)

36 (0.52 %)

3 (0.38 %)

2011-02-18

LexIgnatov

316 868

1 768 (0.84 %)

1 163 (0.73 %)

121 (1.76 %)

2010-10-29

liosha

11 132

1 615 (0.77 %)

1 585 (0.99 %)

6 (0.09 %)

2009-02-14

Obscured

345 918

1 449 (0.69 %)

1 414 (0.88 %)

7 (0.10 %)

2011-03-12

SMS_amur

448 457

1 415 (0.67 %)

975 (0.61 %)

88 (1.28 %)

2011-05-06

Nikolya

333 584

1 335 (0.64 %)

1 025 (0.64 %)

62 (0.90 %)

2010-12-07

Chumes

438 413

1 080 (0.51 %)

665 (0.42 %)

83 (1.21 %)

2011-04-19

Dmi3y

W H S

280 151

933 (0.44 %)

768 (0.48 %)

33 (0.48 %)

2010-06-09

mpioner

231 306

846 (0.40 %)

636 (0.40 %)

42 (0.61 %)

2011-06-15

dimon

109 952

805 (0.38 %)

755 (0.47 %)

10 (0.15 %)

2010-07-29

luch86

266 092

760 (0.36 %)

38 (4.85 %)

2011-05-03

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

680 (0.32 %)

34 (4.34 %)

2011-07-23

Belacqua

261 640

626 (0.30 %)

596 (0.37 %)

6 (0.09 %)

2010-04-19

Ivan Komarov

69 864

608 (0.29 %)

598 (0.37 %)

2 (0.03 %)

2009-07-30

bp0106

204 596

500 (0.24 %)

25 (3.19 %)

2011-04-02

lvv1960

135 138

260 (0.12 %)

13 (1.66 %)

2011-08-25

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.