OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Астраханская область

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	122 820 (88.45 %)	49 (0.04 %)	122 869 (88.49 %)
last edit	14 075 (10.14 %)	1 910 (1.38 %)	15 985 (11.51 %)
v1 + last edit	136 895 (98.59 %)	1 959 (1.41 %)	138 854 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	9 177 (63.01 %)	(0.00 %)	9 177 (63.01 %)
last edit	5 386 (36.98 %)	1 (0.01 %)	5 387 (36.99 %)
v1 + last edit	14 563 (99.99 %)	1 (0.01 %)	14 564 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	520 (66.16 %)	(0.00 %)	520 (66.16 %)
last edit	265 (33.72 %)	1 (0.13 %)	266 (33.84 %)
v1 + last edit	785 (99.87 %)	1 (0.13 %)	786 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	200 (98.52 %)	3 (1.48 %)	203 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	98.52%		98.59%	99.99%	99.87%
sim	35 247	1	25 881 (11.38 %)	22 461 (16.18 %)	664 (4.56 %)	5 (0.64 %)	2011-02-08
AMDmi3	133 332	1	22 356 (9.83 %)	12 166 (8.76 %)	2 018 (13.86 %)	5 (0.64 %)	2012-02-23
ukkschk	492 500	1	18 186 (8.00 %)	10 386 (7.48 %)	1 532 (10.52 %)	7 (0.89 %)	2012-02-18
Dypa4ek	426 223	1	14 800 (6.51 %)	10 745 (7.74 %)	807 (5.54 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2012-02-10
Shelbi	82 574	1	13 749 (6.05 %)	7 594 (5.47 %)	1 231 (8.45 %)		2011-11-15
Enoh	403 103	1	12 522 (5.51 %)	8 547 (6.16 %)	791 (5.43 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2011-06-03
Komяpa	29 320	1	8 762 (3.85 %)	247 (0.18 %)	1 703 (11.69 %)		2011-10-12
Lazarevsk	379 582	1	8 728 (3.84 %)	4 933 (3.55 %)	759 (5.21 %)		2012-01-15
explane	454 042	1	8 659 (3.81 %)	5 064 (3.65 %)	719 (4.94 %)		2011-06-13
qnxoid	254 404	1	8 006 (3.52 %)	5 441 (3.92 %)	513 (3.52 %)		2011-11-03
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	7 300 (3.21 %)			365 (46.44 %)	2011-10-30
nemgushev	145 675	1	7 279 (3.20 %)	7 169 (5.16 %)	22 (0.15 %)		2011-08-16
vlad84	457 505	1	5 391 (2.37 %)	2 596 (1.87 %)	559 (3.84 %)		2011-09-08
awoland	405 585	1	5 257 (2.31 %)	3 057 (2.20 %)	436 (2.99 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2011-06-11
katpatuka	17 497	1	4 765 (2.10 %)	4 680 (3.37 %)	17 (0.12 %)		2009-10-10
dac	151 304	1	4 507 (1.98 %)	3 627 (2.61 %)	140 (0.96 %)	9 (1.15 %)	2011-07-08
Eldev	381 236	1	3 675 (1.62 %)	2 210 (1.59 %)	281 (1.93 %)	3 (0.38 %)	2012-02-06
silix	425 836	1	3 258 (1.43 %)	2 373 (1.71 %)	177 (1.22 %)		2011-03-28
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	2 739 (1.20 %)	1 774 (1.28 %)	77 (0.53 %)	29 (3.69 %)	2012-01-08
AlexAR	13 223	1	2 653 (1.17 %)	2 403 (1.73 %)	50 (0.34 %)		2010-08-28
JekaVGG	183 050	1	2 401 (1.06 %)	1 731 (1.25 %)	62 (0.43 %)	18 (2.29 %)	2012-02-07
Артур	421 210	1	2 392 (1.05 %)	1 242 (0.89 %)	230 (1.58 %)		2011-07-13
Hind	79 836	1	2 260 (0.99 %)			113 (14.38 %)	2012-01-21
lzhl	98 099	1	2 041 (0.90 %)	1 081 (0.78 %)	132 (0.91 %)	15 (1.91 %)	2011-07-18
parukhin	519 501	1	1 991 (0.88 %)	251 (0.18 %)	292 (2.00 %)	14 (1.78 %)	2012-02-26
Darklancer W H S	122 279	0	1 963 (0.86 %)	1 958 (1.41 %)	1 (0.01 %)		2009-08-17
ArsenyN	312 696	1	1 651 (0.73 %)	896 (0.65 %)	139 (0.95 %)	3 (0.38 %)	2011-07-23
andword	406 013	1	1 360 (0.60 %)	1 160 (0.84 %)	40 (0.27 %)		2011-08-15
xaker1	393 492	1	1 269 (0.56 %)	909 (0.65 %)	72 (0.49 %)		2011-04-25
luiswoo	311 318	1	1 093 (0.48 %)	428 (0.31 %)	133 (0.91 %)		2011-01-13
colebatch	184 086	1	994 (0.44 %)	759 (0.55 %)	47 (0.32 %)		2011-05-10
dkiselev	230 942	1	920 (0.40 %)	785 (0.57 %)	27 (0.19 %)		2011-07-18
OldIvantey	314 211	1	816 (0.36 %)	601 (0.43 %)	43 (0.30 %)		2012-02-28
usom	337 115	1	804 (0.35 %)	689 (0.50 %)	23 (0.16 %)		2010-11-29
TomCatGun	532 814	1	778 (0.34 %)	573 (0.41 %)	41 (0.28 %)		2012-01-01
XxX6886	350 120	1	764 (0.34 %)	709 (0.51 %)	11 (0.08 %)		2011-05-23
luch86	266 092	1	760 (0.33 %)			38 (4.83 %)	2012-02-07
munichosom	342 341	1	659 (0.29 %)	624 (0.45 %)	7 (0.05 %)		2010-10-18
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	640 (0.28 %)			32 (4.07 %)	2011-10-28
bp0106	204 596	1	480 (0.21 %)			24 (3.05 %)	2012-02-08
RSergei	432 509	1	460 (0.20 %)			23 (2.93 %)	2012-01-24

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

98.52%

98.59%

99.99%

99.87%

sim

35 247

25 881 (11.38 %)

22 461 (16.18 %)

664 (4.56 %)

5 (0.64 %)

2011-02-08

AMDmi3

133 332

22 356 (9.83 %)

12 166 (8.76 %)

2 018 (13.86 %)

5 (0.64 %)

2012-02-23

ukkschk

492 500

18 186 (8.00 %)

10 386 (7.48 %)

1 532 (10.52 %)

7 (0.89 %)

2012-02-18

Dypa4ek

426 223

14 800 (6.51 %)

10 745 (7.74 %)

807 (5.54 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2012-02-10

Shelbi

82 574

13 749 (6.05 %)

7 594 (5.47 %)

1 231 (8.45 %)

2011-11-15

Enoh

403 103

12 522 (5.51 %)

8 547 (6.16 %)

791 (5.43 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2011-06-03

Komяpa

29 320

8 762 (3.85 %)

247 (0.18 %)

1 703 (11.69 %)

2011-10-12

Lazarevsk

379 582

8 728 (3.84 %)

4 933 (3.55 %)

759 (5.21 %)

2012-01-15

explane

454 042

8 659 (3.81 %)

5 064 (3.65 %)

719 (4.94 %)

2011-06-13

qnxoid

254 404

8 006 (3.52 %)

5 441 (3.92 %)

513 (3.52 %)

2011-11-03

Dennis Apter

180 462

7 300 (3.21 %)

365 (46.44 %)

2011-10-30

nemgushev

145 675

7 279 (3.20 %)

7 169 (5.16 %)

22 (0.15 %)

2011-08-16

vlad84

457 505

5 391 (2.37 %)

2 596 (1.87 %)

559 (3.84 %)

2011-09-08

awoland

405 585

5 257 (2.31 %)

3 057 (2.20 %)

436 (2.99 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2011-06-11

katpatuka

17 497

4 765 (2.10 %)

4 680 (3.37 %)

17 (0.12 %)

2009-10-10

dac

151 304

4 507 (1.98 %)

3 627 (2.61 %)

140 (0.96 %)

9 (1.15 %)

2011-07-08

Eldev

381 236

3 675 (1.62 %)

2 210 (1.59 %)

281 (1.93 %)

3 (0.38 %)

2012-02-06

silix

425 836

3 258 (1.43 %)

2 373 (1.71 %)

177 (1.22 %)

2011-03-28

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

2 739 (1.20 %)

1 774 (1.28 %)

77 (0.53 %)

29 (3.69 %)

2012-01-08

AlexAR

13 223

2 653 (1.17 %)

2 403 (1.73 %)

50 (0.34 %)

2010-08-28

JekaVGG

183 050

2 401 (1.06 %)

1 731 (1.25 %)

62 (0.43 %)

18 (2.29 %)

2012-02-07

Артур

421 210

2 392 (1.05 %)

1 242 (0.89 %)

230 (1.58 %)

2011-07-13

Hind

79 836

2 260 (0.99 %)

113 (14.38 %)

2012-01-21

lzhl

98 099

2 041 (0.90 %)

1 081 (0.78 %)

132 (0.91 %)

15 (1.91 %)

2011-07-18

parukhin

519 501

1 991 (0.88 %)

251 (0.18 %)

292 (2.00 %)

14 (1.78 %)

2012-02-26

Darklancer

W H S

122 279

1 963 (0.86 %)

1 958 (1.41 %)

1 (0.01 %)

2009-08-17

ArsenyN

312 696

1 651 (0.73 %)

896 (0.65 %)

139 (0.95 %)

3 (0.38 %)

2011-07-23

andword

406 013

1 360 (0.60 %)

1 160 (0.84 %)

40 (0.27 %)

2011-08-15

xaker1

393 492

1 269 (0.56 %)

909 (0.65 %)

72 (0.49 %)

2011-04-25

luiswoo

311 318

1 093 (0.48 %)

428 (0.31 %)

133 (0.91 %)

2011-01-13

colebatch

184 086

994 (0.44 %)

759 (0.55 %)

47 (0.32 %)

2011-05-10

dkiselev

230 942

920 (0.40 %)

785 (0.57 %)

27 (0.19 %)

2011-07-18

OldIvantey

314 211

816 (0.36 %)

601 (0.43 %)

43 (0.30 %)

2012-02-28

usom

337 115

804 (0.35 %)

689 (0.50 %)

23 (0.16 %)

2010-11-29

TomCatGun

532 814

778 (0.34 %)

573 (0.41 %)

41 (0.28 %)

2012-01-01

XxX6886

350 120

764 (0.34 %)

709 (0.51 %)

11 (0.08 %)

2011-05-23

luch86

266 092

760 (0.33 %)

38 (4.83 %)

2012-02-07

munichosom

342 341

659 (0.29 %)

624 (0.45 %)

7 (0.05 %)

2010-10-18

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

640 (0.28 %)

32 (4.07 %)

2011-10-28

bp0106

204 596

480 (0.21 %)

24 (3.05 %)

2012-02-08

RSergei

432 509

460 (0.20 %)

23 (2.93 %)

2012-01-24

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.