OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Бурятия

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	165 124 (86.42 %)	2 025 (1.06 %)	167 149 (87.48 %)
last edit	23 300 (12.19 %)	629 (0.33 %)	23 929 (12.52 %)
v1 + last edit	188 424 (98.61 %)	2 654 (1.39 %)	191 078 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	9 835 (69.86 %)	48 (0.34 %)	9 883 (70.20 %)
last edit	4 183 (29.71 %)	13 (0.09 %)	4 196 (29.80 %)
v1 + last edit	14 018 (99.57 %)	61 (0.43 %)	14 079 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	588 (72.41 %)	1 (0.12 %)	589 (72.54 %)
last edit	222 (27.34 %)	1 (0.12 %)	223 (27.46 %)
v1 + last edit	810 (99.75 %)	2 (0.25 %)	812 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	156 (95.12 %)	8 (4.88 %)	164 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	95.12%		98.61%	99.57%	99.75%
svd85	417 330	1	108 059 (38.91 %)	63 669 (33.32 %)	8 798 (62.49 %)	20 (2.46 %)	2011-08-28
katpatuka	17 497	1	48 826 (17.58 %)	46 911 (24.55 %)	375 (2.66 %)	2 (0.25 %)	2010-09-30
Родимич	393 708	1	12 658 (4.56 %)	10 903 (5.71 %)	347 (2.46 %)	1 (0.12 %)	2011-06-10
Nikolya	333 584	1	12 518 (4.51 %)	8 108 (4.24 %)	878 (6.24 %)	1 (0.12 %)	2011-03-26
whalerich	183 878	1	10 112 (3.64 %)	9 062 (4.74 %)	210 (1.49 %)		2010-09-28
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	7 740 (2.79 %)			387 (47.66 %)	2011-08-19
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	7 360 (2.65 %)	6 720 (3.52 %)	52 (0.37 %)	19 (2.34 %)	2011-08-26
colebatch	184 086	1	7 115 (2.56 %)	5 875 (3.07 %)	248 (1.76 %)		2011-05-30
bs1980	124 906	1	6 274 (2.26 %)	5 224 (2.73 %)	198 (1.41 %)	3 (0.37 %)	2011-07-02
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	5 261 (1.89 %)	6 (0.00 %)	907 (6.44 %)	36 (4.43 %)	2011-07-23
Shoorick	4 774	1	5 063 (1.82 %)	4 483 (2.35 %)	96 (0.68 %)	5 (0.62 %)	2010-09-06
lashane	459 464	1	3 678 (1.32 %)	2 573 (1.35 %)	221 (1.57 %)		2011-07-18
glebius	94 786	1	3 640 (1.31 %)	2 735 (1.43 %)	125 (0.89 %)	14 (1.72 %)	2011-03-04
AMDmi3	133 332	1	2 566 (0.92 %)	16 (0.01 %)	446 (3.17 %)	16 (1.97 %)	2011-06-12
flohoff W H S	34 927	-1	2 202 (0.79 %)	1 907 (1.00 %)	55 (0.39 %)	1 (0.12 %)	2011-01-26
Hind	79 836	1	2 160 (0.78 %)			108 (13.30 %)	2011-08-25
Edos	407 737	1	1 887 (0.68 %)	1 752 (0.92 %)	23 (0.16 %)	1 (0.12 %)	2011-07-03
dimon	109 952	1	1 711 (0.62 %)	1 536 (0.80 %)	35 (0.25 %)		2011-06-27
iPhonin	200 243	1	1 613 (0.58 %)	1 538 (0.80 %)	15 (0.11 %)		2011-05-15
Jack Kirby	232 912	1	1 596 (0.57 %)	1 396 (0.73 %)	40 (0.28 %)		2010-06-28
MichaelCollinson	308	1	1 471 (0.53 %)	1 371 (0.72 %)	20 (0.14 %)		2009-01-08
alexmak	100 809	1	1 427 (0.51 %)	1 357 (0.71 %)	10 (0.07 %)	1 (0.12 %)	2010-09-01
Miroff	217 899	1	1 381 (0.50 %)	781 (0.41 %)	36 (0.26 %)	21 (2.59 %)	2011-08-26
greencaps	128 534	1	1 205 (0.43 %)	960 (0.50 %)	49 (0.35 %)		2010-02-24
AlRight	177 084	1	1 157 (0.42 %)	1 137 (0.60 %)	4 (0.03 %)		2011-01-22
Toppazz	241 152	1	1 147 (0.41 %)	877 (0.46 %)	46 (0.33 %)	2 (0.25 %)	2011-06-19
progserega	127 372	1	1 083 (0.39 %)	863 (0.45 %)	36 (0.26 %)	2 (0.25 %)	2011-08-18
Golovco Anatolie	28 068	1	1 042 (0.38 %)	1 042 (0.55 %)			2008-11-03
YuriZ	167 946	1	994 (0.36 %)	564 (0.30 %)	86 (0.61 %)		2011-08-14
Upliner	67 668	1	761 (0.27 %)	676 (0.35 %)	17 (0.12 %)		2009-02-01
luch86	266 092	1	760 (0.27 %)			38 (4.68 %)	2011-05-03
afonin	22 108	1	737 (0.27 %)	622 (0.33 %)	19 (0.13 %)	1 (0.12 %)	2010-12-09
Scaurr0ck	351 275	1	698 (0.25 %)	28 (0.01 %)	62 (0.44 %)	18 (2.22 %)	2011-08-02
HighwayStar	167 595	1	674 (0.24 %)	319 (0.17 %)	71 (0.50 %)		2011-07-23
gqjtcbit	20 129	1	669 (0.24 %)	669 (0.35 %)			2008-02-03
svl42	341 705	1	527 (0.19 %)	507 (0.27 %)	4 (0.03 %)		2010-09-08
bp0106	204 596	1	500 (0.18 %)			25 (3.08 %)	2011-04-02
lvv1960	135 138	1	260 (0.09 %)			13 (1.60 %)	2011-08-25

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

95.12%

98.61%

99.57%

99.75%

svd85

417 330

108 059 (38.91 %)

63 669 (33.32 %)

8 798 (62.49 %)

20 (2.46 %)

2011-08-28

katpatuka

17 497

48 826 (17.58 %)

46 911 (24.55 %)

375 (2.66 %)

2 (0.25 %)

2010-09-30

Родимич

393 708

12 658 (4.56 %)

10 903 (5.71 %)

347 (2.46 %)

1 (0.12 %)

2011-06-10

Nikolya

333 584

12 518 (4.51 %)

8 108 (4.24 %)

878 (6.24 %)

1 (0.12 %)

2011-03-26

whalerich

183 878

10 112 (3.64 %)

9 062 (4.74 %)

210 (1.49 %)

2010-09-28

Dennis Apter

180 462

7 740 (2.79 %)

387 (47.66 %)

2011-08-19

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

7 360 (2.65 %)

6 720 (3.52 %)

52 (0.37 %)

19 (2.34 %)

2011-08-26

colebatch

184 086

7 115 (2.56 %)

5 875 (3.07 %)

248 (1.76 %)

2011-05-30

bs1980

124 906

6 274 (2.26 %)

5 224 (2.73 %)

198 (1.41 %)

3 (0.37 %)

2011-07-02

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

5 261 (1.89 %)

6 (0.00 %)

907 (6.44 %)

36 (4.43 %)

2011-07-23

Shoorick

4 774

5 063 (1.82 %)

4 483 (2.35 %)

96 (0.68 %)

5 (0.62 %)

2010-09-06

lashane

459 464

3 678 (1.32 %)

2 573 (1.35 %)

221 (1.57 %)

2011-07-18

glebius

94 786

3 640 (1.31 %)

2 735 (1.43 %)

125 (0.89 %)

14 (1.72 %)

2011-03-04

AMDmi3

133 332

2 566 (0.92 %)

16 (0.01 %)

446 (3.17 %)

16 (1.97 %)

2011-06-12

flohoff

W H S

34 927

-1

2 202 (0.79 %)

1 907 (1.00 %)

55 (0.39 %)

1 (0.12 %)

2011-01-26

Hind

79 836

2 160 (0.78 %)

108 (13.30 %)

2011-08-25

Edos

407 737

1 887 (0.68 %)

1 752 (0.92 %)

23 (0.16 %)

1 (0.12 %)

2011-07-03

dimon

109 952

1 711 (0.62 %)

1 536 (0.80 %)

35 (0.25 %)

2011-06-27

iPhonin

200 243

1 613 (0.58 %)

1 538 (0.80 %)

15 (0.11 %)

2011-05-15

Jack Kirby

232 912

1 596 (0.57 %)

1 396 (0.73 %)

40 (0.28 %)

2010-06-28

MichaelCollinson

308

1 471 (0.53 %)

1 371 (0.72 %)

20 (0.14 %)

2009-01-08

alexmak

100 809

1 427 (0.51 %)

1 357 (0.71 %)

10 (0.07 %)

1 (0.12 %)

2010-09-01

Miroff

217 899

1 381 (0.50 %)

781 (0.41 %)

36 (0.26 %)

21 (2.59 %)

2011-08-26

greencaps

128 534

1 205 (0.43 %)

960 (0.50 %)

49 (0.35 %)

2010-02-24

AlRight

177 084

1 157 (0.42 %)

1 137 (0.60 %)

4 (0.03 %)

2011-01-22

Toppazz

241 152

1 147 (0.41 %)

877 (0.46 %)

46 (0.33 %)

2 (0.25 %)

2011-06-19

progserega

127 372

1 083 (0.39 %)

863 (0.45 %)

36 (0.26 %)

2 (0.25 %)

2011-08-18

Golovco Anatolie

28 068

1 042 (0.38 %)

1 042 (0.55 %)

2008-11-03

YuriZ

167 946

994 (0.36 %)

564 (0.30 %)

86 (0.61 %)

2011-08-14

Upliner

67 668

761 (0.27 %)

676 (0.35 %)

17 (0.12 %)

2009-02-01

luch86

266 092

760 (0.27 %)

38 (4.68 %)

2011-05-03

afonin

22 108

737 (0.27 %)

622 (0.33 %)

19 (0.13 %)

1 (0.12 %)

2010-12-09

Scaurr0ck

351 275

698 (0.25 %)

28 (0.01 %)

62 (0.44 %)

18 (2.22 %)

2011-08-02

HighwayStar

167 595

674 (0.24 %)

319 (0.17 %)

71 (0.50 %)

2011-07-23

gqjtcbit

20 129

669 (0.24 %)

669 (0.35 %)

2008-02-03

svl42

341 705

527 (0.19 %)

507 (0.27 %)

4 (0.03 %)

2010-09-08

bp0106

204 596

500 (0.18 %)

25 (3.08 %)

2011-04-02

lvv1960

135 138

260 (0.09 %)

13 (1.60 %)

2011-08-25

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.