OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Бурятия

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-09-26, archive: 2011-09-12, 2011-09-05, 2011-08-29, 2011-08-22, 2011-08-15, 2011-08-09, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1167 010 (86.49 %)2 000 (1.04 %)169 010 (87.52 %)
last edit23 652 (12.25 %)441 (0.23 %)24 093 (12.48 %)
v1 + last edit190 662 (98.74 %)2 441 (1.26 %)193 103 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v110 126 (70.10 %)48 (0.33 %)10 174 (70.43 %)
last edit4 259 (29.48 %)13 (0.09 %)4 272 (29.57 %)
v1 + last edit14 385 (99.58 %)61 (0.42 %)14 446 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1578 (71.01 %)1 (0.12 %)579 (71.13 %)
last edit234 (28.75 %)1 (0.12 %)235 (28.87 %)
v1 + last edit812 (99.75 %)2 (0.25 %)814 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 168 (96.00 %)7 (4.00 %)175 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):96.00% 98.74%99.58%99.75% 
svd85417 3301107 594 (38.21 %)63 519 (32.89 %)8 735 (60.47 %)20 (2.46 %)2011-08-28
katpatuka17 497148 761 (17.31 %)46 861 (24.27 %)372 (2.58 %)2 (0.25 %)2010-09-30
Родимич393 708112 636 (4.49 %)10 901 (5.65 %)343 (2.37 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-06-10
Nikolya333 584112 402 (4.40 %)8 052 (4.17 %)866 (5.99 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-03-26
whalerich183 878110 112 (3.59 %)9 062 (4.69 %)210 (1.45 %) 2010-09-28
Dennis Apter180 46217 560 (2.68 %)  378 (46.44 %)2011-07-25
Aleksandr Dezhin12 49417 280 (2.59 %)6 720 (3.48 %)52 (0.36 %)15 (1.84 %)2011-09-22
colebatch184 08616 947 (2.47 %)5 787 (3.00 %)232 (1.61 %) 2011-05-30
bs1980124 90616 219 (2.21 %)5 224 (2.71 %)195 (1.35 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-07-02
Alexandr Zeinalov161 47615 256 (1.87 %)6 (0.00 %)906 (6.27 %)36 (4.42 %)2011-07-23
Shoorick4 77415 063 (1.80 %)4 483 (2.32 %)96 (0.66 %)5 (0.61 %)2010-09-06
lashane459 46413 678 (1.31 %)2 573 (1.33 %)221 (1.53 %) 2011-07-18
glebius94 78613 610 (1.28 %)2 735 (1.42 %)123 (0.85 %)13 (1.60 %)2011-03-04
AMDmi3133 33212 596 (0.92 %)16 (0.01 %)452 (3.13 %)16 (1.97 %)2011-09-09
W  H  S
34 927-12 202 (0.78 %)1 907 (0.99 %)55 (0.38 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-01-26
Ivan14129518 18712 166 (0.77 %)1 271 (0.66 %)179 (1.24 %) 2011-09-21
Hind79 83612 160 (0.77 %)  108 (13.27 %)2011-08-25
progserega127 37212 143 (0.76 %)1 373 (0.71 %)146 (1.01 %)2 (0.25 %)2011-09-24
Edos407 73711 879 (0.67 %)1 749 (0.91 %)22 (0.15 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-07-03
dimon109 95211 687 (0.60 %)1 532 (0.79 %)31 (0.21 %) 2011-06-27
iPhonin200 24311 617 (0.57 %)1 542 (0.80 %)15 (0.10 %) 2011-09-23
Jack Kirby232 91211 596 (0.57 %)1 396 (0.72 %)40 (0.28 %) 2010-06-28
MichaelCollinson30811 471 (0.52 %)1 371 (0.71 %)20 (0.14 %) 2009-01-08
Miroff217 89911 461 (0.52 %)781 (0.40 %)36 (0.25 %)25 (3.07 %)2011-09-25
alexmak100 80911 407 (0.50 %)1 357 (0.70 %)10 (0.07 %) 2010-07-28
greencaps128 53411 162 (0.41 %)922 (0.48 %)48 (0.33 %) 2011-09-15
AlRight177 08411 157 (0.41 %)1 137 (0.59 %)4 (0.03 %) 2011-01-22
Toppazz241 15211 147 (0.41 %)877 (0.45 %)46 (0.32 %)2 (0.25 %)2011-06-19
Golovco Anatolie28 06811 042 (0.37 %)1 042 (0.54 %)  2008-11-03
YuriZ167 94611 035 (0.37 %)560 (0.29 %)95 (0.66 %) 2011-08-29
luch86266 0921760 (0.27 %)  38 (4.67 %)2011-05-03
Upliner67 6681755 (0.27 %)670 (0.35 %)17 (0.12 %) 2009-02-01
afonin22 1081737 (0.26 %)622 (0.32 %)19 (0.13 %)1 (0.12 %)2010-12-09
HighwayStar167 5951674 (0.24 %)319 (0.17 %)71 (0.49 %) 2011-07-23
gqjtcbit20 1291669 (0.24 %)669 (0.35 %)  2008-02-03
Scaurr0ck351 2751613 (0.22 %)28 (0.01 %)61 (0.42 %)14 (1.72 %)2011-09-05
svl42341 7051527 (0.19 %)507 (0.26 %)4 (0.03 %) 2010-09-08
bp0106204 5961500 (0.18 %)  25 (3.07 %)2011-04-02
RSergei432 5091300 (0.11 %)  15 (1.84 %)2011-09-06
lvv1960135 1381260 (0.09 %)  13 (1.60 %)2011-09-01

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!