OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Бурятия

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-10-12, archive: 2011-09-26, 2011-09-12, 2011-09-05, 2011-08-29, 2011-08-22, 2011-08-15, 2011-08-09, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1151 381 (63.47 %)1 256 (0.53 %)152 637 (63.99 %)
last edit85 502 (35.85 %)383 (0.16 %)85 885 (36.01 %)
v1 + last edit236 883 (99.31 %)1 639 (0.69 %)238 522 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v110 490 (67.37 %)46 (0.30 %)10 536 (67.66 %)
last edit5 026 (32.28 %)9 (0.06 %)5 035 (32.34 %)
v1 + last edit15 516 (99.65 %)55 (0.35 %)15 571 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1588 (71.01 %)1 (0.12 %)589 (71.14 %)
last edit238 (28.74 %)1 (0.12 %)239 (28.86 %)
v1 + last edit826 (99.76 %)2 (0.24 %)828 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 160 (96.39 %)6 (3.61 %)166 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):96.39% 99.31%99.65%99.76% 
Nikolya333 584176 338 (22.93 %)70 223 (29.44 %)1 219 (7.83 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-10-06
svd85417 330149 313 (14.81 %)8 363 (3.51 %)8 114 (52.11 %)19 (2.29 %)2011-10-08
katpatuka17 497145 510 (13.67 %)44 015 (18.45 %)291 (1.87 %)2 (0.24 %)2010-09-30
Max Vasilev18 776141 758 (12.54 %)39 098 (16.39 %)464 (2.98 %)17 (2.05 %)2011-10-01
Родимич393 708113 689 (4.11 %)11 804 (4.95 %)373 (2.40 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-10-06
whalerich183 878110 099 (3.03 %)9 049 (3.79 %)210 (1.35 %) 2010-09-28
progserega127 37218 513 (2.56 %)6 813 (2.86 %)328 (2.11 %)3 (0.36 %)2011-10-06
Dennis Apter180 46217 560 (2.27 %)  378 (45.65 %)2011-07-25
Aleksandr Dezhin12 49417 210 (2.17 %)6 720 (2.82 %)50 (0.32 %)12 (1.45 %)2011-09-22
colebatch184 08616 867 (2.06 %)5 787 (2.43 %)216 (1.39 %) 2011-05-30
Shoorick4 77416 215 (1.87 %)5 430 (2.28 %)133 (0.85 %)6 (0.72 %)2011-10-09
bs1980124 90616 097 (1.83 %)5 132 (2.15 %)189 (1.21 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-07-02
Alexandr Zeinalov161 47615 132 (1.54 %)2 (0.00 %)882 (5.66 %)36 (4.35 %)2011-07-23
glebius94 78613 572 (1.07 %)2 867 (1.20 %)85 (0.55 %)14 (1.69 %)2011-09-29
kerby525 86413 355 (1.01 %) 667 (4.28 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-10-04
lashane459 46412 586 (0.78 %)1 511 (0.63 %)215 (1.38 %) 2011-06-28
AMDmi3133 33212 507 (0.75 %)12 (0.01 %)443 (2.85 %)14 (1.69 %)2011-09-28
Komяpa29 32012 470 (0.74 %)730 (0.31 %)348 (2.23 %) 2011-10-08
Hind79 83612 140 (0.64 %)  107 (12.92 %)2011-08-24
Miroff217 89911 829 (0.55 %)729 (0.31 %)116 (0.74 %)26 (3.14 %)2011-10-07
Edos407 73711 820 (0.55 %)1 695 (0.71 %)21 (0.13 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-06-07
iPhonin200 24311 614 (0.48 %)1 539 (0.65 %)15 (0.10 %) 2011-09-23
Jack Kirby232 91211 526 (0.46 %)1 396 (0.59 %)26 (0.17 %) 2010-06-28
dimon109 95211 490 (0.45 %)1 340 (0.56 %)30 (0.19 %) 2011-06-27
alexmak100 80911 387 (0.42 %)1 357 (0.57 %)6 (0.04 %) 2010-07-28
W  H  S
34 927-11 385 (0.42 %)1 115 (0.47 %)50 (0.32 %)1 (0.12 %)2011-01-26
MichaelCollinson30811 339 (0.40 %)1 339 (0.56 %)  2009-01-08
AlRight177 08411 157 (0.35 %)1 137 (0.48 %)4 (0.03 %) 2011-01-22
Toppazz241 15211 122 (0.34 %)862 (0.36 %)44 (0.28 %)2 (0.24 %)2011-06-19
greencaps128 53411 067 (0.32 %)872 (0.37 %)39 (0.25 %) 2011-09-15
Golovco Anatolie28 06811 042 (0.31 %)1 042 (0.44 %)  2008-11-03
Ivan14129518 1871896 (0.27 %)6 (0.00 %)178 (1.14 %) 2011-09-21
YuriZ167 9461820 (0.25 %)430 (0.18 %)78 (0.50 %) 2011-08-29
luch86266 0921720 (0.22 %)  36 (4.35 %)2011-05-03
afonin22 1081712 (0.21 %)622 (0.26 %)14 (0.09 %)1 (0.12 %)2010-12-09
Upliner67 6681710 (0.21 %)670 (0.28 %)8 (0.05 %) 2009-02-01
svl42341 7051527 (0.16 %)507 (0.21 %)4 (0.03 %) 2010-09-08
Scaurr0ck351 2751503 (0.15 %)28 (0.01 %)47 (0.30 %)12 (1.45 %)2011-09-05
bp0106204 5961480 (0.14 %)  24 (2.90 %)2011-04-02
RSergei432 5091300 (0.09 %)  15 (1.81 %)2011-09-06
lvv1960135 1381280 (0.08 %)  14 (1.69 %)2011-09-29

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!