OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Бурятия

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	167 496 (66.12 %)	190 (0.07 %)	167 686 (66.19 %)
last edit	85 389 (33.71 %)	265 (0.10 %)	85 654 (33.81 %)
v1 + last edit	252 885 (99.82 %)	455 (0.18 %)	253 340 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	11 653 (68.27 %)	2 (0.01 %)	11 655 (68.28 %)
last edit	5 412 (31.71 %)	2 (0.01 %)	5 414 (31.72 %)
v1 + last edit	17 065 (99.98 %)	4 (0.02 %)	17 069 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	565 (63.41 %)	(0.00 %)	565 (63.41 %)
last edit	326 (36.59 %)	0 (0.00 %)	326 (36.59 %)
v1 + last edit	891 (100.00 %)	0 (0.00 %)	891 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	195 (97.99 %)	4 (2.01 %)	199 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	97.99%		99.82%	99.98%	100.00%
Nikolya	333 584	1	84 113 (23.59 %)	73 283 (28.93 %)	2 158 (12.64 %)	2 (0.22 %)	2011-10-31
svd85	417 330	1	48 071 (13.48 %)	8 356 (3.30 %)	7 883 (46.18 %)	15 (1.68 %)	2012-02-09
katpatuka	17 497	1	45 103 (12.65 %)	43 798 (17.29 %)	237 (1.39 %)	6 (0.67 %)	2012-04-25
Max Vasilev	18 776	1	41 708 (11.70 %)	39 098 (15.43 %)	462 (2.71 %)	15 (1.68 %)	2011-10-01
Родимич	393 708	1	13 765 (3.86 %)	11 905 (4.70 %)	368 (2.16 %)	1 (0.11 %)	2012-03-16
progserega	127 372	1	10 296 (2.89 %)	8 106 (3.20 %)	422 (2.47 %)	4 (0.45 %)	2011-12-28
whalerich	183 878	1	10 105 (2.83 %)	9 055 (3.57 %)	210 (1.23 %)		2011-10-18
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	7 308 (2.05 %)	6 883 (2.72 %)	33 (0.19 %)	13 (1.46 %)	2011-11-20
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	7 200 (2.02 %)			360 (40.40 %)	2011-10-30
colebatch	184 086	1	6 784 (1.90 %)	5 759 (2.27 %)	205 (1.20 %)		2011-05-30
Shoorick	4 774	1	6 120 (1.72 %)	5 420 (2.14 %)	120 (0.70 %)	5 (0.56 %)	2011-10-09
bs1980	124 906	1	6 111 (1.71 %)	5 181 (2.05 %)	186 (1.09 %)		2012-03-20
Dinamik	39 040	1	5 049 (1.42 %)	2 349 (0.93 %)	408 (2.39 %)	33 (3.70 %)	2012-04-23
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	4 927 (1.38 %)	2 (0.00 %)	857 (5.02 %)	32 (3.59 %)	2011-10-28
Scaurr0ck	351 275	1	4 365 (1.22 %)	3 470 (1.37 %)	147 (0.86 %)	8 (0.90 %)	2012-03-13
glebius	94 786	1	3 373 (0.95 %)	2 863 (1.13 %)	74 (0.43 %)	7 (0.79 %)	2011-09-29
AMDmi3	133 332	1	3 186 (0.89 %)	16 (0.01 %)	578 (3.39 %)	14 (1.57 %)	2012-02-24
kerby	525 864	1	3 073 (0.86 %)	13 (0.01 %)	608 (3.56 %)	1 (0.11 %)	2011-11-18
lashane	459 464	1	2 469 (0.69 %)	1 509 (0.60 %)	192 (1.12 %)		2011-06-28
LexIgnatov	316 868	1	2 271 (0.64 %)	1 356 (0.54 %)	87 (0.51 %)	24 (2.69 %)	2011-12-04
Hind	79 836	1	2 220 (0.62 %)			111 (12.46 %)	2012-01-21
iPhonin	200 243	1	2 109 (0.59 %)	1 599 (0.63 %)	102 (0.60 %)		2012-03-31
Komяpa	29 320	1	1 834 (0.51 %)	724 (0.29 %)	222 (1.30 %)		2011-10-12
Miroff	217 899	1	1 820 (0.51 %)	785 (0.31 %)	127 (0.74 %)	20 (2.24 %)	2011-12-17
Edos	407 737	1	1 819 (0.51 %)	1 694 (0.67 %)	21 (0.12 %)	1 (0.11 %)	2012-03-20
Jack Kirby	232 912	1	1 525 (0.43 %)	1 395 (0.55 %)	26 (0.15 %)		2010-06-28
dimon	109 952	1	1 473 (0.41 %)	1 338 (0.53 %)	27 (0.16 %)		2011-06-27
alexmak	100 809	1	1 387 (0.39 %)	1 357 (0.54 %)	6 (0.04 %)		2010-07-28
flohoff	34 927	1	1 349 (0.38 %)	1 114 (0.44 %)	43 (0.25 %)	1 (0.11 %)	2011-01-26
MichaelCollinson	308	1	1 339 (0.38 %)	1 339 (0.53 %)			2009-01-08
AlRight	177 084	1	1 147 (0.32 %)	1 137 (0.45 %)	2 (0.01 %)		2011-01-22
OldIvantey	314 211	1	1 129 (0.32 %)	919 (0.36 %)	42 (0.25 %)		2012-04-15
Toppazz	241 152	1	1 092 (0.31 %)	862 (0.34 %)	42 (0.25 %)	1 (0.11 %)	2011-06-19
Golovco Anatolie	28 068	1	1 042 (0.29 %)	1 042 (0.41 %)			2008-11-03
greencaps	128 534	1	1 037 (0.29 %)	837 (0.33 %)	40 (0.23 %)		2011-11-24
Brait	131 635	1	955 (0.27 %)	230 (0.09 %)	69 (0.40 %)	19 (2.13 %)	2012-05-06
Ivan14129	518 187	1	876 (0.25 %)	6 (0.00 %)	174 (1.02 %)		2011-09-21
YuriZ	167 946	1	795 (0.22 %)	430 (0.17 %)	73 (0.43 %)		2012-03-18
luch86	266 092	1	740 (0.21 %)			37 (4.15 %)	2012-04-20
aighes	110 639	1	700 (0.20 %)	605 (0.24 %)	19 (0.11 %)		2011-12-23
Upliner	67 668	1	690 (0.19 %)	665 (0.26 %)	5 (0.03 %)		2009-02-01
afonin	22 108	1	647 (0.18 %)	612 (0.24 %)	7 (0.04 %)		2010-12-09
svl42	341 705	1	522 (0.15 %)	507 (0.20 %)	3 (0.02 %)		2010-09-08
RSergei	432 509	1	520 (0.15 %)			26 (2.92 %)	2012-05-02
bp0106	204 596	1	480 (0.13 %)			24 (2.69 %)	2012-04-22
werner2101	110 263	1	335 (0.09 %)		3 (0.02 %)	16 (1.80 %)	2012-05-06

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

97.99%

99.82%

99.98%

100.00%

Nikolya

333 584

84 113 (23.59 %)

73 283 (28.93 %)

2 158 (12.64 %)

2 (0.22 %)

2011-10-31

svd85

417 330

48 071 (13.48 %)

8 356 (3.30 %)

7 883 (46.18 %)

15 (1.68 %)

2012-02-09

katpatuka

17 497

45 103 (12.65 %)

43 798 (17.29 %)

237 (1.39 %)

6 (0.67 %)

2012-04-25

Max Vasilev

18 776

41 708 (11.70 %)

39 098 (15.43 %)

462 (2.71 %)

15 (1.68 %)

2011-10-01

Родимич

393 708

13 765 (3.86 %)

11 905 (4.70 %)

368 (2.16 %)

1 (0.11 %)

2012-03-16

progserega

127 372

10 296 (2.89 %)

8 106 (3.20 %)

422 (2.47 %)

4 (0.45 %)

2011-12-28

whalerich

183 878

10 105 (2.83 %)

9 055 (3.57 %)

210 (1.23 %)

2011-10-18

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

7 308 (2.05 %)

6 883 (2.72 %)

33 (0.19 %)

13 (1.46 %)

2011-11-20

Dennis Apter

180 462

7 200 (2.02 %)

360 (40.40 %)

2011-10-30

colebatch

184 086

6 784 (1.90 %)

5 759 (2.27 %)

205 (1.20 %)

2011-05-30

Shoorick

4 774

6 120 (1.72 %)

5 420 (2.14 %)

120 (0.70 %)

5 (0.56 %)

2011-10-09

bs1980

124 906

6 111 (1.71 %)

5 181 (2.05 %)

186 (1.09 %)

2012-03-20

Dinamik

39 040

5 049 (1.42 %)

2 349 (0.93 %)

408 (2.39 %)

33 (3.70 %)

2012-04-23

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

4 927 (1.38 %)

2 (0.00 %)

857 (5.02 %)

32 (3.59 %)

2011-10-28

Scaurr0ck

351 275

4 365 (1.22 %)

3 470 (1.37 %)

147 (0.86 %)

8 (0.90 %)

2012-03-13

glebius

94 786

3 373 (0.95 %)

2 863 (1.13 %)

74 (0.43 %)

7 (0.79 %)

2011-09-29

AMDmi3

133 332

3 186 (0.89 %)

16 (0.01 %)

578 (3.39 %)

14 (1.57 %)

2012-02-24

kerby

525 864

3 073 (0.86 %)

13 (0.01 %)

608 (3.56 %)

1 (0.11 %)

2011-11-18

lashane

459 464

2 469 (0.69 %)

1 509 (0.60 %)

192 (1.12 %)

2011-06-28

LexIgnatov

316 868

2 271 (0.64 %)

1 356 (0.54 %)

87 (0.51 %)

24 (2.69 %)

2011-12-04

Hind

79 836

2 220 (0.62 %)

111 (12.46 %)

2012-01-21

iPhonin

200 243

2 109 (0.59 %)

1 599 (0.63 %)

102 (0.60 %)

2012-03-31

Komяpa

29 320

1 834 (0.51 %)

724 (0.29 %)

222 (1.30 %)

2011-10-12

Miroff

217 899

1 820 (0.51 %)

785 (0.31 %)

127 (0.74 %)

20 (2.24 %)

2011-12-17

Edos

407 737

1 819 (0.51 %)

1 694 (0.67 %)

21 (0.12 %)

1 (0.11 %)

2012-03-20

Jack Kirby

232 912

1 525 (0.43 %)

1 395 (0.55 %)

26 (0.15 %)

2010-06-28

dimon

109 952

1 473 (0.41 %)

1 338 (0.53 %)

27 (0.16 %)

2011-06-27

alexmak

100 809

1 387 (0.39 %)

1 357 (0.54 %)

6 (0.04 %)

2010-07-28

flohoff

34 927

1 349 (0.38 %)

1 114 (0.44 %)

43 (0.25 %)

1 (0.11 %)

2011-01-26

MichaelCollinson

308

1 339 (0.38 %)

1 339 (0.53 %)

2009-01-08

AlRight

177 084

1 147 (0.32 %)

1 137 (0.45 %)

2 (0.01 %)

2011-01-22

OldIvantey

314 211

1 129 (0.32 %)

919 (0.36 %)

42 (0.25 %)

2012-04-15

Toppazz

241 152

1 092 (0.31 %)

862 (0.34 %)

42 (0.25 %)

1 (0.11 %)

2011-06-19

Golovco Anatolie

28 068

1 042 (0.29 %)

1 042 (0.41 %)

2008-11-03

greencaps

128 534

1 037 (0.29 %)

837 (0.33 %)

40 (0.23 %)

2011-11-24

Brait

131 635

955 (0.27 %)

230 (0.09 %)

69 (0.40 %)

19 (2.13 %)

2012-05-06

Ivan14129

518 187

876 (0.25 %)

6 (0.00 %)

174 (1.02 %)

2011-09-21

YuriZ

167 946

795 (0.22 %)

430 (0.17 %)

73 (0.43 %)

2012-03-18

luch86

266 092

740 (0.21 %)

37 (4.15 %)

2012-04-20

aighes

110 639

700 (0.20 %)

605 (0.24 %)

19 (0.11 %)

2011-12-23

Upliner

67 668

690 (0.19 %)

665 (0.26 %)

5 (0.03 %)

2009-02-01

afonin

22 108

647 (0.18 %)

612 (0.24 %)

7 (0.04 %)

2010-12-09

svl42

341 705

522 (0.15 %)

507 (0.20 %)

3 (0.02 %)

2010-09-08

RSergei

432 509

520 (0.15 %)

26 (2.92 %)

2012-05-02

bp0106

204 596

480 (0.13 %)

24 (2.69 %)

2012-04-22

werner2101

110 263

335 (0.09 %)

3 (0.02 %)

16 (1.80 %)

2012-05-06

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.