OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Чукотский автономный округ

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	248 245 (82.91 %)	345 (0.12 %)	248 590 (83.02 %)
last edit	50 828 (16.98 %)	1 (0.00 %)	50 829 (16.98 %)
v1 + last edit	299 073 (99.88 %)	346 (0.12 %)	299 419 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	6 810 (68.35 %)	8 (0.08 %)	6 818 (68.43 %)
last edit	3 145 (31.56 %)	1 (0.01 %)	3 146 (31.57 %)
v1 + last edit	9 955 (99.91 %)	9 (0.09 %)	9 964 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	662 (71.96 %)	(0.00 %)	662 (71.96 %)
last edit	257 (27.93 %)	1 (0.11 %)	258 (28.04 %)
v1 + last edit	919 (99.89 %)	1 (0.11 %)	920 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	132 (96.35 %)	5 (3.65 %)	137 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	96.35%		99.88%	99.91%	99.89%
AMDmi3	133 332	1	72 327 (19.67 %)	63 762 (21.30 %)	1 577 (15.83 %)	34 (3.70 %)	2012-01-23
Jason Reid	7 774	1	54 780 (14.90 %)	54 035 (18.05 %)	149 (1.50 %)		2008-01-13
Max Vasilev	18 776	1	47 797 (13.00 %)	46 362 (15.48 %)	287 (2.88 %)		2011-10-14
jstein	31 319	1	34 355 (9.34 %)	28 895 (9.65 %)	764 (7.67 %)	82 (8.91 %)	2012-01-01
Divjo	63 375	1	23 935 (6.51 %)	19 265 (6.43 %)	930 (9.33 %)	1 (0.11 %)	2011-09-04
mikes	6 270	1	18 033 (4.91 %)	7 473 (2.50 %)	1 908 (19.15 %)	51 (5.54 %)	2008-10-09
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	15 261 (4.15 %)	14 701 (4.91 %)	44 (0.44 %)	17 (1.85 %)	2012-01-08
dkt	5 553	1	13 682 (3.72 %)	13 297 (4.44 %)	77 (0.77 %)		2008-01-22
Gleban	130 026	1	11 455 (3.12 %)	8 005 (2.67 %)	682 (6.84 %)	2 (0.22 %)	2012-01-11
evg794	333 639	1	9 309 (2.53 %)	7 389 (2.47 %)	384 (3.85 %)		2012-01-23
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	7 400 (2.01 %)			370 (40.22 %)	2011-10-30
MichaelCollinson	308	1	5 335 (1.45 %)	4 680 (1.56 %)	131 (1.31 %)		2010-01-29
Ivan Komarov	69 864	1	5 205 (1.42 %)	4 805 (1.60 %)	68 (0.68 %)	3 (0.33 %)	2010-07-26
ppeta	82 083	1	4 740 (1.29 %)	155 (0.05 %)	761 (7.64 %)	39 (4.24 %)	2011-12-13
Scaurr0ck	351 275	1	4 617 (1.26 %)	4 062 (1.36 %)	107 (1.07 %)	1 (0.11 %)	2011-12-16
katpatuka	17 497	1	4 176 (1.14 %)	4 036 (1.35 %)	28 (0.28 %)		2009-08-17
LexIgnatov	316 868	1	4 173 (1.14 %)	3 008 (1.00 %)	221 (2.22 %)	3 (0.33 %)	2011-11-22
one_half_3544	95 117	1	3 997 (1.09 %)	2 072 (0.69 %)	381 (3.82 %)	1 (0.11 %)	2012-01-28
Peter14	13 832	1	2 696 (0.73 %)	1 381 (0.46 %)	263 (2.64 %)		2008-03-15
Hind	79 836	1	2 365 (0.64 %)		1 (0.01 %)	118 (12.83 %)	2012-01-21
chilin	127 494	1	2 231 (0.61 %)	2 071 (0.69 %)	32 (0.32 %)		2011-10-27
quarksteilchen	45 511	1	2 219 (0.60 %)	1 609 (0.54 %)	122 (1.22 %)		2011-02-26
afetser	560 814	1	1 735 (0.47 %)	1 240 (0.41 %)	95 (0.95 %)	1 (0.11 %)	2012-01-04
p666	506 584	1	1 655 (0.45 %)	830 (0.28 %)	165 (1.66 %)		2011-09-14
Andre68	31 231	1	1 414 (0.38 %)	449 (0.15 %)	193 (1.94 %)		2011-12-24
Xmypblu	395 071	1	1 326 (0.36 %)	501 (0.17 %)	113 (1.13 %)	13 (1.41 %)	2011-12-24
PA94	45 027	1	951 (0.26 %)	71 (0.02 %)	168 (1.69 %)	2 (0.22 %)	2012-01-21
luch86	266 092	1	760 (0.21 %)			38 (4.13 %)	2012-01-17
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	640 (0.17 %)			32 (3.48 %)	2011-10-28
robx	17 508	1	640 (0.17 %)	595 (0.20 %)	9 (0.09 %)		2009-03-13
kleptog	5 278	1	537 (0.15 %)	517 (0.17 %)	4 (0.04 %)		2008-01-18
RSergei	432 509	1	460 (0.13 %)			23 (2.50 %)	2012-01-24
bp0106	204 596	1	420 (0.11 %)			21 (2.28 %)	2011-04-02

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

96.35%

99.88%

99.91%

99.89%

AMDmi3

133 332

72 327 (19.67 %)

63 762 (21.30 %)

1 577 (15.83 %)

34 (3.70 %)

2012-01-23

Jason Reid

7 774

54 780 (14.90 %)

54 035 (18.05 %)

149 (1.50 %)

2008-01-13

Max Vasilev

18 776

47 797 (13.00 %)

46 362 (15.48 %)

287 (2.88 %)

2011-10-14

jstein

31 319

34 355 (9.34 %)

28 895 (9.65 %)

764 (7.67 %)

82 (8.91 %)

2012-01-01

Divjo

63 375

23 935 (6.51 %)

19 265 (6.43 %)

930 (9.33 %)

1 (0.11 %)

2011-09-04

mikes

6 270

18 033 (4.91 %)

7 473 (2.50 %)

1 908 (19.15 %)

51 (5.54 %)

2008-10-09

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

15 261 (4.15 %)

14 701 (4.91 %)

44 (0.44 %)

17 (1.85 %)

2012-01-08

dkt

5 553

13 682 (3.72 %)

13 297 (4.44 %)

77 (0.77 %)

2008-01-22

Gleban

130 026

11 455 (3.12 %)

8 005 (2.67 %)

682 (6.84 %)

2 (0.22 %)

2012-01-11

evg794

333 639

9 309 (2.53 %)

7 389 (2.47 %)

384 (3.85 %)

2012-01-23

Dennis Apter

180 462

7 400 (2.01 %)

370 (40.22 %)

2011-10-30

MichaelCollinson

308

5 335 (1.45 %)

4 680 (1.56 %)

131 (1.31 %)

2010-01-29

Ivan Komarov

69 864

5 205 (1.42 %)

4 805 (1.60 %)

68 (0.68 %)

3 (0.33 %)

2010-07-26

ppeta

82 083

4 740 (1.29 %)

155 (0.05 %)

761 (7.64 %)

39 (4.24 %)

2011-12-13

Scaurr0ck

351 275

4 617 (1.26 %)

4 062 (1.36 %)

107 (1.07 %)

1 (0.11 %)

2011-12-16

katpatuka

17 497

4 176 (1.14 %)

4 036 (1.35 %)

28 (0.28 %)

2009-08-17

LexIgnatov

316 868

4 173 (1.14 %)

3 008 (1.00 %)

221 (2.22 %)

3 (0.33 %)

2011-11-22

one_half_3544

95 117

3 997 (1.09 %)

2 072 (0.69 %)

381 (3.82 %)

1 (0.11 %)

2012-01-28

Peter14

13 832

2 696 (0.73 %)

1 381 (0.46 %)

263 (2.64 %)

2008-03-15

Hind

79 836

2 365 (0.64 %)

1 (0.01 %)

118 (12.83 %)

2012-01-21

chilin

127 494

2 231 (0.61 %)

2 071 (0.69 %)

32 (0.32 %)

2011-10-27

quarksteilchen

45 511

2 219 (0.60 %)

1 609 (0.54 %)

122 (1.22 %)

2011-02-26

afetser

560 814

1 735 (0.47 %)

1 240 (0.41 %)

95 (0.95 %)

1 (0.11 %)

2012-01-04

p666

506 584

1 655 (0.45 %)

830 (0.28 %)

165 (1.66 %)

2011-09-14

Andre68

31 231

1 414 (0.38 %)

449 (0.15 %)

193 (1.94 %)

2011-12-24

Xmypblu

395 071

1 326 (0.36 %)

501 (0.17 %)

113 (1.13 %)

13 (1.41 %)

2011-12-24

PA94

45 027

951 (0.26 %)

71 (0.02 %)

168 (1.69 %)

2 (0.22 %)

2012-01-21

luch86

266 092

760 (0.21 %)

38 (4.13 %)

2012-01-17

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

640 (0.17 %)

32 (3.48 %)

2011-10-28

robx

17 508

640 (0.17 %)

595 (0.20 %)

9 (0.09 %)

2009-03-13

kleptog

5 278

537 (0.15 %)

517 (0.17 %)

4 (0.04 %)

2008-01-18

RSergei

432 509

460 (0.13 %)

23 (2.50 %)

2012-01-24

bp0106

204 596

420 (0.11 %)

21 (2.28 %)

2011-04-02

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.