OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Чувашия

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2012-02-29, archive: 2012-02-14, 2012-01-30, 2012-01-16, 2011-12-28, 2011-12-15, 2011-11-23, 2011-11-09, 2011-10-25, 2011-10-12, 2011-09-26, 2011-09-12, 2011-09-05, 2011-08-30, 2011-08-22, 2011-08-15, 2011-08-09, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1261 078 (80.38 %)17 (0.01 %)261 095 (80.38 %)
last edit63 482 (19.54 %)247 (0.08 %)63 729 (19.62 %)
v1 + last edit324 560 (99.92 %)264 (0.08 %)324 824 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v116 659 (58.78 %)3 (0.01 %)16 662 (58.79 %)
last edit11 678 (41.21 %)0 (0.00 %)11 678 (41.21 %)
v1 + last edit28 337 (99.99 %)3 (0.01 %)28 340 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1729 (78.81 %) (0.00 %)729 (78.81 %)
last edit196 (21.19 %)0 (0.00 %)196 (21.19 %)
v1 + last edit925 (100.00 %)0 (0.00 %)925 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 225 (97.40 %)6 (2.60 %)231 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):97.40% 99.92%99.99%100.00% 
oom249 5761154 734 (31.90 %)106 829 (32.89 %)7 245 (25.56 %)584 (63.14 %)2012-02-28
shafr261 620147 967 (9.89 %)42 092 (12.96 %)1 127 (3.98 %)12 (1.30 %)2011-11-24
Art'y235 335132 027 (6.60 %)19 932 (6.14 %)2 375 (8.38 %)11 (1.19 %)2012-01-30
kolen73 184128 638 (5.90 %)24 788 (7.63 %)722 (2.55 %)12 (1.30 %)2011-10-18
LHD532 095128 438 (5.86 %)14 078 (4.33 %)2 584 (9.12 %)72 (7.78 %)2012-02-26
Alexey Illarionov423 572116 807 (3.47 %)577 (0.18 %)3 238 (11.43 %)2 (0.22 %)2011-12-03
hj2366 410113 179 (2.72 %)7 124 (2.19 %)1 211 (4.27 %) 2011-06-28
Mikhail Kozlov541 443112 220 (2.52 %)8 605 (2.65 %)711 (2.51 %)3 (0.32 %)2012-02-23
portweinson544 890110 912 (2.25 %)9 457 (2.91 %)263 (0.93 %)7 (0.76 %)2012-02-20
Aleksandr Dezhin12 494110 533 (2.17 %)9 818 (3.02 %)59 (0.21 %)21 (2.27 %)2012-01-17
Links254 827110 483 (2.16 %)7 363 (2.27 %)624 (2.20 %) 2012-02-16
Errandir231 87219 956 (2.05 %)8 131 (2.50 %)365 (1.29 %) 2011-08-05
osmAlex250 40919 226 (1.90 %)6 301 (1.94 %)585 (2.06 %) 2010-05-12
ikz174 42017 817 (1.61 %)7 632 (2.35 %)29 (0.10 %)2 (0.22 %)2011-07-31
zetx16345 49317 707 (1.59 %)4 532 (1.40 %)463 (1.63 %)43 (4.65 %)2012-02-05
m72mixa468 24616 362 (1.31 %)3 152 (0.97 %)638 (2.25 %)1 (0.11 %)2011-06-27
Monitor222 23716 227 (1.28 %)3 197 (0.98 %)354 (1.25 %)63 (6.81 %)2012-02-28
Komяpa29 32015 672 (1.17 %)1 532 (0.47 %)828 (2.92 %) 2011-10-12
AMDmi3133 33215 473 (1.13 %)13 (0.00 %)1 084 (3.82 %)2 (0.22 %)2012-02-24
lzhl98 09914 810 (0.99 %)2 520 (0.78 %)366 (1.29 %)23 (2.49 %)2011-07-08
Upliner67 66813 940 (0.81 %)3 870 (1.19 %)14 (0.05 %) 2010-01-18
LInfo378 75313 524 (0.73 %)1 899 (0.58 %)317 (1.12 %)2 (0.22 %)2011-12-31
sashashemelev461 64013 407 (0.70 %)1 742 (0.54 %)333 (1.18 %) 2011-11-04
Felis Pimeja260 75612 827 (0.58 %)2 437 (0.75 %)62 (0.22 %)4 (0.43 %)2012-02-18
KirillEfimov552 30412 824 (0.58 %)1 384 (0.43 %)284 (1.00 %)1 (0.11 %)2012-02-03
Gordeich427 18712 531 (0.52 %)1 976 (0.61 %)83 (0.29 %)7 (0.76 %)2011-06-18
Max Vasilev18 77612 230 (0.46 %)1 765 (0.54 %)85 (0.30 %)2 (0.22 %)2011-12-26
mr_x264 86512 208 (0.46 %)1 518 (0.47 %)138 (0.49 %) 2010-06-10
Antisida395 22811 782 (0.37 %)1 407 (0.43 %)47 (0.17 %)7 (0.76 %)2011-12-09
SarRus207 33811 760 (0.36 %)1 460 (0.45 %)60 (0.21 %) 2011-10-23
lehalukoil407 01511 693 (0.35 %)628 (0.19 %)213 (0.75 %) 2011-04-20
EugeneP370 64011 686 (0.35 %)1 221 (0.38 %)93 (0.33 %) 2011-05-26
veter27189 33111 505 (0.31 %)1 135 (0.35 %)66 (0.23 %)2 (0.22 %)2011-05-05
Artemy1408 06911 311 (0.27 %)841 (0.26 %)94 (0.33 %) 2011-05-06
VirWayer517 76511 179 (0.24 %)709 (0.22 %)94 (0.33 %) 2012-01-10
mishka100380 50811 122 (0.23 %)242 (0.07 %)168 (0.59 %)2 (0.22 %)2011-01-12
Bowser24 3631931 (0.19 %)931 (0.29 %)  2010-09-03
katpatuka17 4971820 (0.17 %)800 (0.25 %)4 (0.01 %) 2010-06-27
AntonM21339 4991625 (0.13 %)545 (0.17 %)16 (0.06 %) 2011-10-19
firstest504 4591581 (0.12 %)151 (0.05 %)86 (0.30 %) 2011-08-12
WildBoar395 7051576 (0.12 %)536 (0.17 %)8 (0.03 %) 2011-04-24
Dan Wood609 7601572 (0.12 %)2 (0.00 %)90 (0.32 %)6 (0.65 %)2012-02-24
wec327 1771506 (0.10 %)506 (0.16 %)  2010-08-17
fndoder434 9271425 (0.09 %)50 (0.02 %)75 (0.26 %) 2011-10-10
trolleway397 3261424 (0.09 %)69 (0.02 %)71 (0.25 %) 2011-06-29

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!