OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Карачаево-Черкессия

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	355 683 (88.67 %)	1 572 (0.39 %)	357 255 (89.06 %)
last edit	42 825 (10.68 %)	1 072 (0.27 %)	43 897 (10.94 %)
v1 + last edit	398 508 (99.34 %)	2 644 (0.66 %)	401 152 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	32 229 (82.48 %)	64 (0.16 %)	32 293 (82.64 %)
last edit	6 737 (17.24 %)	45 (0.12 %)	6 782 (17.36 %)
v1 + last edit	38 966 (99.72 %)	109 (0.28 %)	39 075 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	792 (72.93 %)	1 (0.09 %)	793 (73.02 %)
last edit	292 (26.89 %)	1 (0.09 %)	293 (26.98 %)
v1 + last edit	1 084 (99.82 %)	2 (0.18 %)	1 086 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	197 (97.04 %)	6 (2.96 %)	203 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	97.04%		99.34%	99.72%	99.82%
esigns	589 086	1	229 251 (37.08 %)	113 386 (28.27 %)	23 105 (59.13 %)	17 (1.57 %)	2012-02-28
garl	51 196	1	152 694 (24.70 %)	124 714 (31.09 %)	5 188 (13.28 %)	102 (9.39 %)	2012-02-28
Евген-71	362 231	1	55 589 (8.99 %)	39 039 (9.73 %)	3 310 (8.47 %)		2011-07-09
ulil	16 881	1	46 942 (7.59 %)	42 837 (10.68 %)	817 (2.09 %)	1 (0.09 %)	2011-04-07
Z440	236 129	1	13 701 (2.22 %)	11 766 (2.93 %)	375 (0.96 %)	3 (0.28 %)	2010-12-05
jnskhlr	42 051	1	12 525 (2.03 %)	10 110 (2.52 %)	483 (1.24 %)		2010-11-20
teologop	435 534	1	11 820 (1.91 %)	5 235 (1.30 %)	1 025 (2.62 %)	73 (6.72 %)	2012-02-17
KekcuHa	30 590	1	11 001 (1.78 %)	6 366 (1.59 %)	467 (1.20 %)	115 (10.59 %)	2011-05-29
stiker1	217 828	1	9 407 (1.52 %)	6 027 (1.50 %)	676 (1.73 %)		2012-02-06
Kotelnikov	104 883	1	9 204 (1.49 %)	8 174 (2.04 %)	194 (0.50 %)	3 (0.28 %)	2011-09-02
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	7 300 (1.18 %)			365 (33.61 %)	2011-10-30
AMDmi3	133 332	1	5 089 (0.82 %)	4 (0.00 %)	1 005 (2.57 %)	3 (0.28 %)	2012-02-24
AlexAR	13 223	1	3 157 (0.51 %)	2 132 (0.53 %)	205 (0.52 %)		2011-09-13
wowik W H S	115 477	-1	3 076 (0.50 %)	2 551 (0.64 %)	101 (0.26 %)	1 (0.09 %)	2011-02-28
katpatuka	17 497	1	2 755 (0.45 %)	2 730 (0.68 %)	5 (0.01 %)		2009-09-03
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	2 733 (0.44 %)	1 828 (0.46 %)	97 (0.25 %)	21 (1.93 %)	2011-11-19
ise95	391 127	1	2 402 (0.39 %)	1 637 (0.41 %)	153 (0.39 %)		2011-01-09
Hind	79 836	1	2 260 (0.37 %)			113 (10.41 %)	2012-01-21
Vovanium	87 682	1	2 237 (0.36 %)	1 807 (0.45 %)	86 (0.22 %)		2010-02-24
Vitaly	12 792	1	1 820 (0.29 %)	1 640 (0.41 %)	36 (0.09 %)		2010-12-18
vanmhit	101 999	1	1 703 (0.28 %)	413 (0.10 %)	234 (0.60 %)	6 (0.55 %)	2011-07-05
Tizianos	209 668	1	1 616 (0.26 %)	1 466 (0.37 %)	30 (0.08 %)		2011-06-20
AOleg	97 465	1	1 583 (0.26 %)	1 473 (0.37 %)	22 (0.06 %)		2012-02-15
Noskov	297 055	1	1 562 (0.25 %)	1 367 (0.34 %)	39 (0.10 %)		2011-11-15
Ordin	386 508	1	1 517 (0.25 %)	157 (0.04 %)	128 (0.33 %)	36 (3.31 %)	2011-04-24
Scaramouche	437 392	1	1 440 (0.23 %)	1 145 (0.29 %)	59 (0.15 %)		2012-01-07
OldIvantey	314 211	1	1 321 (0.21 %)	906 (0.23 %)	83 (0.21 %)		2011-03-25
JumpStart International	125 156	1	1 235 (0.20 %)	870 (0.22 %)	73 (0.19 %)		2011-02-14
parukhin	519 501	1	1 151 (0.19 %)	431 (0.11 %)	108 (0.28 %)	9 (0.83 %)	2012-02-26
WizardRND	374 853	1	1 081 (0.17 %)	781 (0.19 %)	60 (0.15 %)		2011-10-17
amak	262 551	1	1 072 (0.17 %)	357 (0.09 %)	127 (0.33 %)	4 (0.37 %)	2012-02-26
ivan52agronom	413 467	1	1 017 (0.16 %)	477 (0.12 %)	108 (0.28 %)		2011-06-27
MaXeP	165 465	1	904 (0.15 %)	904 (0.23 %)			2010-09-02
gguj	72 133	1	863 (0.14 %)	853 (0.21 %)	2 (0.01 %)		2011-10-11
sim	35 247	1	809 (0.13 %)	564 (0.14 %)	25 (0.06 %)	6 (0.55 %)	2010-06-27
luch86	266 092	1	760 (0.12 %)			38 (3.50 %)	2012-02-07
MichaelCollinson	308	1	677 (0.11 %)	637 (0.16 %)	8 (0.02 %)		2009-05-06
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	640 (0.10 %)			32 (2.95 %)	2011-10-28
moszkva ter	495 146	1	580 (0.09 %)	130 (0.03 %)	30 (0.08 %)	15 (1.38 %)	2012-02-17
bp0106	204 596	1	480 (0.08 %)			24 (2.21 %)	2012-02-08
RSergei	432 509	1	460 (0.07 %)			23 (2.12 %)	2012-01-24

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

97.04%

99.34%

99.72%

99.82%

esigns

589 086

229 251 (37.08 %)

113 386 (28.27 %)

23 105 (59.13 %)

17 (1.57 %)

2012-02-28

garl

51 196

152 694 (24.70 %)

124 714 (31.09 %)

5 188 (13.28 %)

102 (9.39 %)

2012-02-28

Евген-71

362 231

55 589 (8.99 %)

39 039 (9.73 %)

3 310 (8.47 %)

2011-07-09

ulil

16 881

46 942 (7.59 %)

42 837 (10.68 %)

817 (2.09 %)

1 (0.09 %)

2011-04-07

Z440

236 129

13 701 (2.22 %)

11 766 (2.93 %)

375 (0.96 %)

3 (0.28 %)

2010-12-05

jnskhlr

42 051

12 525 (2.03 %)

10 110 (2.52 %)

483 (1.24 %)

2010-11-20

teologop

435 534

11 820 (1.91 %)

5 235 (1.30 %)

1 025 (2.62 %)

73 (6.72 %)

2012-02-17

KekcuHa

30 590

11 001 (1.78 %)

6 366 (1.59 %)

467 (1.20 %)

115 (10.59 %)

2011-05-29

stiker1

217 828

9 407 (1.52 %)

6 027 (1.50 %)

676 (1.73 %)

2012-02-06

Kotelnikov

104 883

9 204 (1.49 %)

8 174 (2.04 %)

194 (0.50 %)

3 (0.28 %)

2011-09-02

Dennis Apter

180 462

7 300 (1.18 %)

365 (33.61 %)

2011-10-30

AMDmi3

133 332

5 089 (0.82 %)

4 (0.00 %)

1 005 (2.57 %)

3 (0.28 %)

2012-02-24

AlexAR

13 223

3 157 (0.51 %)

2 132 (0.53 %)

205 (0.52 %)

2011-09-13

wowik

W H S

115 477

-1

3 076 (0.50 %)

2 551 (0.64 %)

101 (0.26 %)

1 (0.09 %)

2011-02-28

katpatuka

17 497

2 755 (0.45 %)

2 730 (0.68 %)

5 (0.01 %)

2009-09-03

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

2 733 (0.44 %)

1 828 (0.46 %)

97 (0.25 %)

21 (1.93 %)

2011-11-19

ise95

391 127

2 402 (0.39 %)

1 637 (0.41 %)

153 (0.39 %)

2011-01-09

Hind

79 836

2 260 (0.37 %)

113 (10.41 %)

2012-01-21

Vovanium

87 682

2 237 (0.36 %)

1 807 (0.45 %)

86 (0.22 %)

2010-02-24

Vitaly

12 792

1 820 (0.29 %)

1 640 (0.41 %)

36 (0.09 %)

2010-12-18

vanmhit

101 999

1 703 (0.28 %)

413 (0.10 %)

234 (0.60 %)

6 (0.55 %)

2011-07-05

Tizianos

209 668

1 616 (0.26 %)

1 466 (0.37 %)

30 (0.08 %)

2011-06-20

AOleg

97 465

1 583 (0.26 %)

1 473 (0.37 %)

22 (0.06 %)

2012-02-15

Noskov

297 055

1 562 (0.25 %)

1 367 (0.34 %)

39 (0.10 %)

2011-11-15

Ordin

386 508

1 517 (0.25 %)

157 (0.04 %)

128 (0.33 %)

36 (3.31 %)

2011-04-24

Scaramouche

437 392

1 440 (0.23 %)

1 145 (0.29 %)

59 (0.15 %)

2012-01-07

OldIvantey

314 211

1 321 (0.21 %)

906 (0.23 %)

83 (0.21 %)

2011-03-25

JumpStart International

125 156

1 235 (0.20 %)

870 (0.22 %)

73 (0.19 %)

2011-02-14

parukhin

519 501

1 151 (0.19 %)

431 (0.11 %)

108 (0.28 %)

9 (0.83 %)

2012-02-26

WizardRND

374 853

1 081 (0.17 %)

781 (0.19 %)

60 (0.15 %)

2011-10-17

amak

262 551

1 072 (0.17 %)

357 (0.09 %)

127 (0.33 %)

4 (0.37 %)

2012-02-26

ivan52agronom

413 467

1 017 (0.16 %)

477 (0.12 %)

108 (0.28 %)

2011-06-27

MaXeP

165 465

904 (0.15 %)

904 (0.23 %)

2010-09-02

gguj

72 133

863 (0.14 %)

853 (0.21 %)

2 (0.01 %)

2011-10-11

sim

35 247

809 (0.13 %)

564 (0.14 %)

25 (0.06 %)

6 (0.55 %)

2010-06-27

luch86

266 092

760 (0.12 %)

38 (3.50 %)

2012-02-07

MichaelCollinson

308

677 (0.11 %)

637 (0.16 %)

8 (0.02 %)

2009-05-06

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

640 (0.10 %)

32 (2.95 %)

2011-10-28

moszkva ter

495 146

580 (0.09 %)

130 (0.03 %)

30 (0.08 %)

15 (1.38 %)

2012-02-17

bp0106

204 596

480 (0.08 %)

24 (2.21 %)

2012-02-08

RSergei

432 509

460 (0.07 %)

23 (2.12 %)

2012-01-24

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.