OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Курганская область

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	346 005 (88.62 %)	1 461 (0.37 %)	347 466 (89.00 %)
last edit	42 664 (10.93 %)	297 (0.08 %)	42 961 (11.00 %)
v1 + last edit	388 669 (99.55 %)	1 758 (0.45 %)	390 427 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	24 542 (70.19 %)	34 (0.10 %)	24 576 (70.29 %)
last edit	10 380 (29.69 %)	9 (0.03 %)	10 389 (29.71 %)
v1 + last edit	34 922 (99.88 %)	43 (0.12 %)	34 965 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	1 067 (81.26 %)	(0.00 %)	1 067 (81.26 %)
last edit	245 (18.66 %)	1 (0.08 %)	246 (18.74 %)
v1 + last edit	1 312 (99.92 %)	1 (0.08 %)	1 313 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	185 (94.87 %)	10 (5.13 %)	195 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	94.87%		99.55%	99.88%	99.92%
Saveli	447 162	1	139 505 (23.58 %)	85 980 (22.02 %)	10 369 (29.66 %)	84 (6.40 %)	2011-08-13
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	61 615 (10.42 %)	38 335 (9.82 %)	1 624 (4.64 %)	758 (57.73 %)	2011-08-21
ОлегЪ	302 734	1	60 074 (10.16 %)	44 689 (11.45 %)	3 077 (8.80 %)		2011-07-09
M_Vokhm	424 795	1	49 151 (8.31 %)	39 006 (9.99 %)	1 809 (5.17 %)	55 (4.19 %)	2011-08-20
Сергеич	398 389	1	37 533 (6.35 %)	18 928 (4.85 %)	3 721 (10.64 %)		2011-03-19
workdao	150 105	1	32 126 (5.43 %)	21 711 (5.56 %)	2 079 (5.95 %)	1 (0.08 %)	2011-02-01
varelick	197 816	1	29 407 (4.97 %)	22 152 (5.67 %)	1 451 (4.15 %)		2011-08-16
Ozab	245 942	1	24 144 (4.08 %)	15 739 (4.03 %)	1 665 (4.76 %)	4 (0.30 %)	2011-01-12
alexfrol	12 184	1	20 213 (3.42 %)	16 643 (4.26 %)	574 (1.64 %)	35 (2.67 %)	2011-08-17
Stalker61	402 319	1	17 772 (3.00 %)	13 242 (3.39 %)	906 (2.59 %)		2011-08-19
AMDmi3	133 332	1	16 708 (2.82 %)	43 (0.01 %)	3 329 (9.52 %)	1 (0.08 %)	2011-08-16
Silver87	310 635	1	12 521 (2.12 %)	10 806 (2.77 %)	339 (0.97 %)	1 (0.08 %)	2011-08-21
Sadless74	85 553	1	9 707 (1.64 %)	7 602 (1.95 %)	405 (1.16 %)	4 (0.30 %)	2011-05-18
dimuzz	155 079	1	8 139 (1.38 %)	6 874 (1.76 %)	245 (0.70 %)	2 (0.15 %)	2011-07-07
dedNikifor	142 776	1	7 944 (1.34 %)	5 724 (1.47 %)	424 (1.21 %)	5 (0.38 %)	2011-08-15
Shoorick	4 774	1	5 582 (0.94 %)	5 107 (1.31 %)	87 (0.25 %)	2 (0.15 %)	2011-08-21
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	4 051 (0.68 %)	3 141 (0.80 %)	78 (0.22 %)	26 (1.98 %)	2011-08-01
rosnin	137 579	1	3 620 (0.61 %)	3 020 (0.77 %)	108 (0.31 %)	3 (0.23 %)	2011-08-20
dkiselev	230 942	1	3 164 (0.53 %)	2 744 (0.70 %)	84 (0.24 %)		2011-08-15
KekcuHa	30 590	1	3 079 (0.52 %)	2 729 (0.70 %)	70 (0.20 %)		2009-12-29
Nexor	221 087	1	2 747 (0.46 %)	697 (0.18 %)	410 (1.17 %)		2011-04-08
KDV	444 982	1	2 607 (0.44 %)	1 742 (0.45 %)	173 (0.49 %)		2011-05-11
katpatuka	17 497	1	2 344 (0.40 %)	2 144 (0.55 %)	40 (0.11 %)		2010-09-06
Тимофей Невежин	477 063	1	2 248 (0.38 %)	1 603 (0.41 %)	129 (0.37 %)		2011-06-26
serg2496	501 243	1	2 239 (0.38 %)	1 204 (0.31 %)	207 (0.59 %)		2011-08-07
const_st	409 763	1	2 164 (0.37 %)	1 634 (0.42 %)	102 (0.29 %)	1 (0.08 %)	2011-08-18
Hind	79 836	1	2 140 (0.36 %)			107 (8.15 %)	2011-06-12
cvuneeez	489 625	1	1 837 (0.31 %)	1 567 (0.40 %)	54 (0.15 %)		2011-08-13
Алексей W H S	137 093	0	1 708 (0.29 %)	1 518 (0.39 %)	38 (0.11 %)		2009-09-04
Dmitry2006	62 497	1	1 638 (0.28 %)	143 (0.04 %)	223 (0.64 %)	19 (1.45 %)	2011-01-11
OldIvantey	314 211	1	1 545 (0.26 %)	910 (0.23 %)	91 (0.26 %)	9 (0.69 %)	2011-05-01
Mir76	204 582	1	1 335 (0.23 %)	1 170 (0.30 %)	33 (0.09 %)		2011-06-20
chernysh	399 172	1	1 331 (0.23 %)	646 (0.17 %)	133 (0.38 %)	1 (0.08 %)	2011-04-07
Шанс	425 098	1	1 206 (0.20 %)	936 (0.24 %)	50 (0.14 %)	1 (0.08 %)	2011-08-08
b166er	52 759	1	1 158 (0.20 %)	733 (0.19 %)	85 (0.24 %)		2011-06-12
neutron	140 650	1	1 140 (0.19 %)	1 035 (0.27 %)	21 (0.06 %)		2009-11-23
woodpeck	5 164	1	1 091 (0.18 %)	756 (0.19 %)	67 (0.19 %)		2008-09-12
Degtiarev	411 078	1	924 (0.16 %)	699 (0.18 %)	45 (0.13 %)		2011-07-31
Upliner	67 668	1	821 (0.14 %)	821 (0.21 %)			2009-01-02
luch86	266 092	1	760 (0.13 %)			38 (2.89 %)	2011-05-03
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	680 (0.11 %)			34 (2.59 %)	2011-07-23
wlad762	456 475	1	642 (0.11 %)	582 (0.15 %)	12 (0.03 %)		2011-05-20
az09	156 743	1	552 (0.09 %)	527 (0.13 %)	5 (0.01 %)		2011-07-16
bp0106	204 596	1	500 (0.08 %)			25 (1.90 %)	2011-04-02
lvv1960	135 138	1	280 (0.05 %)			14 (1.07 %)	2011-08-13

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

94.87%

99.55%

99.88%

99.92%

Saveli

447 162

139 505 (23.58 %)

85 980 (22.02 %)

10 369 (29.66 %)

84 (6.40 %)

2011-08-13

Dennis Apter

180 462

61 615 (10.42 %)

38 335 (9.82 %)

1 624 (4.64 %)

758 (57.73 %)

2011-08-21

ОлегЪ

302 734

60 074 (10.16 %)

44 689 (11.45 %)

3 077 (8.80 %)

2011-07-09

M_Vokhm

424 795

49 151 (8.31 %)

39 006 (9.99 %)

1 809 (5.17 %)

55 (4.19 %)

2011-08-20

Сергеич

398 389

37 533 (6.35 %)

18 928 (4.85 %)

3 721 (10.64 %)

2011-03-19

workdao

150 105

32 126 (5.43 %)

21 711 (5.56 %)

2 079 (5.95 %)

1 (0.08 %)

2011-02-01

varelick

197 816

29 407 (4.97 %)

22 152 (5.67 %)

1 451 (4.15 %)

2011-08-16

Ozab

245 942

24 144 (4.08 %)

15 739 (4.03 %)

1 665 (4.76 %)

4 (0.30 %)

2011-01-12

alexfrol

12 184

20 213 (3.42 %)

16 643 (4.26 %)

574 (1.64 %)

35 (2.67 %)

2011-08-17

Stalker61

402 319

17 772 (3.00 %)

13 242 (3.39 %)

906 (2.59 %)

2011-08-19

AMDmi3

133 332

16 708 (2.82 %)

43 (0.01 %)

3 329 (9.52 %)

1 (0.08 %)

2011-08-16

Silver87

310 635

12 521 (2.12 %)

10 806 (2.77 %)

339 (0.97 %)

1 (0.08 %)

2011-08-21

Sadless74

85 553

9 707 (1.64 %)

7 602 (1.95 %)

405 (1.16 %)

4 (0.30 %)

2011-05-18

dimuzz

155 079

8 139 (1.38 %)

6 874 (1.76 %)

245 (0.70 %)

2 (0.15 %)

2011-07-07

dedNikifor

142 776

7 944 (1.34 %)

5 724 (1.47 %)

424 (1.21 %)

5 (0.38 %)

2011-08-15

Shoorick

4 774

5 582 (0.94 %)

5 107 (1.31 %)

87 (0.25 %)

2 (0.15 %)

2011-08-21

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

4 051 (0.68 %)

3 141 (0.80 %)

78 (0.22 %)

26 (1.98 %)

2011-08-01

rosnin

137 579

3 620 (0.61 %)

3 020 (0.77 %)

108 (0.31 %)

3 (0.23 %)

2011-08-20

dkiselev

230 942

3 164 (0.53 %)

2 744 (0.70 %)

84 (0.24 %)

2011-08-15

KekcuHa

30 590

3 079 (0.52 %)

2 729 (0.70 %)

70 (0.20 %)

2009-12-29

Nexor

221 087

2 747 (0.46 %)

697 (0.18 %)

410 (1.17 %)

2011-04-08

KDV

444 982

2 607 (0.44 %)

1 742 (0.45 %)

173 (0.49 %)

2011-05-11

katpatuka

17 497

2 344 (0.40 %)

2 144 (0.55 %)

40 (0.11 %)

2010-09-06

Тимофей Невежин

477 063

2 248 (0.38 %)

1 603 (0.41 %)

129 (0.37 %)

2011-06-26

serg2496

501 243

2 239 (0.38 %)

1 204 (0.31 %)

207 (0.59 %)

2011-08-07

const_st

409 763

2 164 (0.37 %)

1 634 (0.42 %)

102 (0.29 %)

1 (0.08 %)

2011-08-18

Hind

79 836

2 140 (0.36 %)

107 (8.15 %)

2011-06-12

cvuneeez

489 625

1 837 (0.31 %)

1 567 (0.40 %)

54 (0.15 %)

2011-08-13

Алексей

W H S

137 093

1 708 (0.29 %)

1 518 (0.39 %)

38 (0.11 %)

2009-09-04

Dmitry2006

62 497

1 638 (0.28 %)

143 (0.04 %)

223 (0.64 %)

19 (1.45 %)

2011-01-11

OldIvantey

314 211

1 545 (0.26 %)

910 (0.23 %)

91 (0.26 %)

9 (0.69 %)

2011-05-01

Mir76

204 582

1 335 (0.23 %)

1 170 (0.30 %)

33 (0.09 %)

2011-06-20

chernysh

399 172

1 331 (0.23 %)

646 (0.17 %)

133 (0.38 %)

1 (0.08 %)

2011-04-07

Шанс

425 098

1 206 (0.20 %)

936 (0.24 %)

50 (0.14 %)

1 (0.08 %)

2011-08-08

b166er

52 759

1 158 (0.20 %)

733 (0.19 %)

85 (0.24 %)

2011-06-12

neutron

140 650

1 140 (0.19 %)

1 035 (0.27 %)

21 (0.06 %)

2009-11-23

woodpeck

5 164

1 091 (0.18 %)

756 (0.19 %)

67 (0.19 %)

2008-09-12

Degtiarev

411 078

924 (0.16 %)

699 (0.18 %)

45 (0.13 %)

2011-07-31

Upliner

67 668

821 (0.14 %)

821 (0.21 %)

2009-01-02

luch86

266 092

760 (0.13 %)

38 (2.89 %)

2011-05-03

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

680 (0.11 %)

34 (2.59 %)

2011-07-23

wlad762

456 475

642 (0.11 %)

582 (0.15 %)

12 (0.03 %)

2011-05-20

az09

156 743

552 (0.09 %)

527 (0.13 %)

5 (0.01 %)

2011-07-16

bp0106

204 596

500 (0.08 %)

25 (1.90 %)

2011-04-02

lvv1960

135 138

280 (0.05 %)

14 (1.07 %)

2011-08-13

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.