OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Хабаровский край

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	390 641 (80.10 %)	854 (0.18 %)	391 495 (80.27 %)
last edit	96 114 (19.71 %)	93 (0.02 %)	96 207 (19.73 %)
v1 + last edit	486 755 (99.81 %)	947 (0.19 %)	487 702 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	20 350 (56.53 %)	46 (0.13 %)	20 396 (56.66 %)
last edit	15 561 (43.23 %)	40 (0.11 %)	15 601 (43.34 %)
v1 + last edit	35 911 (99.76 %)	86 (0.24 %)	35 997 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	743 (56.29 %)	(0.00 %)	743 (56.29 %)
last edit	575 (43.56 %)	2 (0.15 %)	577 (43.71 %)
v1 + last edit	1 318 (99.85 %)	2 (0.15 %)	1 320 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	242 (92.72 %)	19 (7.28 %)	261 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	92.72%		99.81%	99.76%	99.85%
kisaa	68 982	1	178 451 (25.71 %)	109 106 (22.37 %)	12 241 (34.01 %)	407 (30.83 %)	2012-01-21
AAlex	319 192	1	96 481 (13.90 %)	62 966 (12.91 %)	6 615 (18.38 %)	22 (1.67 %)	2012-01-19
OOlga	389 780	1	93 349 (13.45 %)	76 489 (15.68 %)	3 232 (8.98 %)	35 (2.65 %)	2012-02-09
katpatuka	17 497	1	52 250 (7.53 %)	51 680 (10.60 %)	102 (0.28 %)	3 (0.23 %)	2012-02-09
Kostin	479 269	1	42 138 (6.07 %)	18 048 (3.70 %)	4 818 (13.38 %)		2011-12-28
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	32 226 (4.64 %)	31 671 (6.49 %)	43 (0.12 %)	17 (1.29 %)	2012-01-27
Max Vasilev	18 776	1	24 674 (3.55 %)	21 039 (4.31 %)	727 (2.02 %)		2011-10-13
eulochon	110 564	1	17 079 (2.46 %)	14 934 (3.06 %)	409 (1.14 %)	5 (0.38 %)	2010-04-23
Jason Reid	7 774	1	13 145 (1.89 %)	13 010 (2.67 %)	27 (0.08 %)		2008-03-02
spatialfun	105 275	1	12 434 (1.79 %)	11 589 (2.38 %)	165 (0.46 %)	1 (0.08 %)	2009-10-05
MoonDoctor	342 604	1	10 349 (1.49 %)	6 369 (1.31 %)	796 (2.21 %)		2011-12-01
p666	506 584	1	9 627 (1.39 %)	6 687 (1.37 %)	576 (1.60 %)	3 (0.23 %)	2011-09-14
LexIgnatov	316 868	1	9 360 (1.35 %)	6 835 (1.40 %)	481 (1.34 %)	6 (0.45 %)	2012-01-03
jth	1 777	1	9 147 (1.32 %)	9 077 (1.86 %)	14 (0.04 %)		2008-04-20
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	7 340 (1.06 %)			367 (27.80 %)	2011-10-30
progserega	127 372	1	7 277 (1.05 %)	6 622 (1.36 %)	131 (0.36 %)		2012-02-01
AMDmi3	133 332	1	6 212 (0.89 %)	47 (0.01 %)	1 125 (3.13 %)	27 (2.05 %)	2012-01-17
StAL	393 930	1	6 193 (0.89 %)	4 783 (0.98 %)	282 (0.78 %)		2012-01-05
colebatch	184 086	1	5 831 (0.84 %)	5 556 (1.14 %)	55 (0.15 %)		2011-07-10
MichaelCollinson	308	1	5 300 (0.76 %)	5 300 (1.09 %)			2009-01-09
grayint3	337 358	1	5 208 (0.75 %)	2 803 (0.57 %)	481 (1.34 %)		2011-09-25
Serg-Zmuh	410 418	1	4 208 (0.61 %)	2 888 (0.59 %)	264 (0.73 %)		2011-12-06
verybadbug	507 494	1	4 085 (0.59 %)	555 (0.11 %)	702 (1.95 %)	1 (0.08 %)	2011-11-21
Dmitry V	497 426	1	3 953 (0.57 %)	2 263 (0.46 %)	338 (0.94 %)		2011-09-09
Hind	79 836	1	3 033 (0.44 %)	723 (0.15 %)	6 (0.02 %)	114 (8.64 %)	2012-01-21
Kuprienko_Viktor	162 223	1	2 507 (0.36 %)	1 472 (0.30 %)	195 (0.54 %)	3 (0.23 %)	2011-11-23
s-s-s	168 188	1	1 818 (0.26 %)	1 793 (0.37 %)	5 (0.01 %)		2011-10-04
eGorynych	505 569	1	1 509 (0.22 %)	1 289 (0.26 %)	44 (0.12 %)		2011-09-23
PA94	45 027	1	1 408 (0.20 %)	693 (0.14 %)	131 (0.36 %)	3 (0.23 %)	2011-07-10
Runixer_kms	426 570	1	1 373 (0.20 %)	43 (0.01 %)	182 (0.51 %)	21 (1.59 %)	2012-02-13
Miroff	217 899	1	1 307 (0.19 %)	147 (0.03 %)	180 (0.50 %)	13 (0.98 %)	2011-10-12
Upliner	67 668	1	1 256 (0.18 %)	1 256 (0.26 %)			2009-05-24
cryptbeast	247 793	1	1 121 (0.16 %)	601 (0.12 %)	96 (0.27 %)	2 (0.15 %)	2011-12-19
Sergei Kuznetsov	434 204	1	832 (0.12 %)	792 (0.16 %)	8 (0.02 %)		2011-05-23
luch86	266 092	1	760 (0.11 %)			38 (2.88 %)	2012-02-07
Silver87	310 635	1	742 (0.11 %)	602 (0.12 %)	28 (0.08 %)		2012-01-26
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	640 (0.09 %)			32 (2.42 %)	2011-10-28
parukhin	519 501	1	612 (0.09 %)	112 (0.02 %)	68 (0.19 %)	8 (0.61 %)	2012-01-21
glebius	94 786	1	581 (0.08 %)	16 (0.00 %)	85 (0.24 %)	7 (0.53 %)	2010-06-05
werner2101	110 263	1	580 (0.08 %)			29 (2.20 %)	2010-10-04
Sergey Astakhov	143 266	1	575 (0.08 %)		115 (0.32 %)		2011-12-14
bp0106	204 596	1	480 (0.07 %)			24 (1.82 %)	2012-02-08
RSergei	432 509	1	460 (0.07 %)			23 (1.74 %)	2012-01-24
AkMeR	11 049	1	377 (0.05 %)	7 (0.00 %)	18 (0.05 %)	14 (1.06 %)	2010-02-28
Paspartu	393 964	1	368 (0.05 %)	93 (0.02 %)	15 (0.04 %)	10 (0.76 %)	2012-02-12

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

92.72%

99.81%

99.76%

99.85%

kisaa

68 982

178 451 (25.71 %)

109 106 (22.37 %)

12 241 (34.01 %)

407 (30.83 %)

2012-01-21

AAlex

319 192

96 481 (13.90 %)

62 966 (12.91 %)

6 615 (18.38 %)

22 (1.67 %)

2012-01-19

OOlga

389 780

93 349 (13.45 %)

76 489 (15.68 %)

3 232 (8.98 %)

35 (2.65 %)

2012-02-09

katpatuka

17 497

52 250 (7.53 %)

51 680 (10.60 %)

102 (0.28 %)

3 (0.23 %)

2012-02-09

Kostin

479 269

42 138 (6.07 %)

18 048 (3.70 %)

4 818 (13.38 %)

2011-12-28

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

32 226 (4.64 %)

31 671 (6.49 %)

43 (0.12 %)

17 (1.29 %)

2012-01-27

Max Vasilev

18 776

24 674 (3.55 %)

21 039 (4.31 %)

727 (2.02 %)

2011-10-13

eulochon

110 564

17 079 (2.46 %)

14 934 (3.06 %)

409 (1.14 %)

5 (0.38 %)

2010-04-23

Jason Reid

7 774

13 145 (1.89 %)

13 010 (2.67 %)

27 (0.08 %)

2008-03-02

spatialfun

105 275

12 434 (1.79 %)

11 589 (2.38 %)

165 (0.46 %)

1 (0.08 %)

2009-10-05

MoonDoctor

342 604

10 349 (1.49 %)

6 369 (1.31 %)

796 (2.21 %)

2011-12-01

p666

506 584

9 627 (1.39 %)

6 687 (1.37 %)

576 (1.60 %)

3 (0.23 %)

2011-09-14

LexIgnatov

316 868

9 360 (1.35 %)

6 835 (1.40 %)

481 (1.34 %)

6 (0.45 %)

2012-01-03

jth

1 777

9 147 (1.32 %)

9 077 (1.86 %)

14 (0.04 %)

2008-04-20

Dennis Apter

180 462

7 340 (1.06 %)

367 (27.80 %)

2011-10-30

progserega

127 372

7 277 (1.05 %)

6 622 (1.36 %)

131 (0.36 %)

2012-02-01

AMDmi3

133 332

6 212 (0.89 %)

47 (0.01 %)

1 125 (3.13 %)

27 (2.05 %)

2012-01-17

StAL

393 930

6 193 (0.89 %)

4 783 (0.98 %)

282 (0.78 %)

2012-01-05

colebatch

184 086

5 831 (0.84 %)

5 556 (1.14 %)

55 (0.15 %)

2011-07-10

MichaelCollinson

308

5 300 (0.76 %)

5 300 (1.09 %)

2009-01-09

grayint3

337 358

5 208 (0.75 %)

2 803 (0.57 %)

481 (1.34 %)

2011-09-25

Serg-Zmuh

410 418

4 208 (0.61 %)

2 888 (0.59 %)

264 (0.73 %)

2011-12-06

verybadbug

507 494

4 085 (0.59 %)

555 (0.11 %)

702 (1.95 %)

1 (0.08 %)

2011-11-21

Dmitry V

497 426

3 953 (0.57 %)

2 263 (0.46 %)

338 (0.94 %)

2011-09-09

Hind

79 836

3 033 (0.44 %)

723 (0.15 %)

6 (0.02 %)

114 (8.64 %)

2012-01-21

Kuprienko_Viktor

162 223

2 507 (0.36 %)

1 472 (0.30 %)

195 (0.54 %)

3 (0.23 %)

2011-11-23

s-s-s

168 188

1 818 (0.26 %)

1 793 (0.37 %)

5 (0.01 %)

2011-10-04

eGorynych

505 569

1 509 (0.22 %)

1 289 (0.26 %)

44 (0.12 %)

2011-09-23

PA94

45 027

1 408 (0.20 %)

693 (0.14 %)

131 (0.36 %)

3 (0.23 %)

2011-07-10

Runixer_kms

426 570

1 373 (0.20 %)

43 (0.01 %)

182 (0.51 %)

21 (1.59 %)

2012-02-13

Miroff

217 899

1 307 (0.19 %)

147 (0.03 %)

180 (0.50 %)

13 (0.98 %)

2011-10-12

Upliner

67 668

1 256 (0.18 %)

1 256 (0.26 %)

2009-05-24

cryptbeast

247 793

1 121 (0.16 %)

601 (0.12 %)

96 (0.27 %)

2 (0.15 %)

2011-12-19

Sergei Kuznetsov

434 204

832 (0.12 %)

792 (0.16 %)

8 (0.02 %)

2011-05-23

luch86

266 092

760 (0.11 %)

38 (2.88 %)

2012-02-07

Silver87

310 635

742 (0.11 %)

602 (0.12 %)

28 (0.08 %)

2012-01-26

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

640 (0.09 %)

32 (2.42 %)

2011-10-28

parukhin

519 501

612 (0.09 %)

112 (0.02 %)

68 (0.19 %)

8 (0.61 %)

2012-01-21

glebius

94 786

581 (0.08 %)

16 (0.00 %)

85 (0.24 %)

7 (0.53 %)

2010-06-05

werner2101

110 263

580 (0.08 %)

29 (2.20 %)

2010-10-04

Sergey Astakhov

143 266

575 (0.08 %)

115 (0.32 %)

2011-12-14

bp0106

204 596

480 (0.07 %)

24 (1.82 %)

2012-02-08

RSergei

432 509

460 (0.07 %)

23 (1.74 %)

2012-01-24

AkMeR

11 049

377 (0.05 %)

7 (0.00 %)

18 (0.05 %)

14 (1.06 %)

2010-02-28

Paspartu

393 964

368 (0.05 %)

93 (0.02 %)

15 (0.04 %)

10 (0.76 %)

2012-02-12

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.