OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Марий Эл

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-08-10, archive: 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1450 897 (82.95 %)3 318 (0.61 %)454 215 (83.56 %)
last edit86 525 (15.92 %)2 828 (0.52 %)89 353 (16.44 %)
v1 + last edit537 422 (98.87 %)6 146 (1.13 %)543 568 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v127 546 (65.15 %)795 (1.88 %)28 341 (67.03 %)
last edit13 480 (31.88 %)460 (1.09 %)13 940 (32.97 %)
v1 + last edit41 026 (97.03 %)1 255 (2.97 %)42 281 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v11 069 (81.92 %) (0.00 %)1 069 (81.92 %)
last edit236 (18.08 %)0 (0.00 %)236 (18.08 %)
v1 + last edit1 305 (100.00 %)0 (0.00 %)1 305 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 248 (93.23 %)18 (6.77 %)266 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):93.23% 98.87%97.03%100.00% 
kolen73 1841199 617 (25.56 %)134 897 (24.82 %)11 248 (26.60 %)424 (32.49 %)2011-08-07
Art'y235 3351116 297 (14.89 %)81 907 (15.07 %)6 746 (15.96 %)33 (2.53 %)2011-07-17
shafr261 6201103 991 (13.31 %)90 996 (16.74 %)2 423 (5.73 %)44 (3.37 %)2011-07-18
Gordeich427 187159 657 (7.64 %)34 337 (6.32 %)2 928 (6.93 %)534 (40.92 %)2011-08-05
itsasin387 313150 528 (6.47 %)45 613 (8.39 %)819 (1.94 %)41 (3.14 %)2011-07-27
oom249 576150 190 (6.43 %)36 120 (6.64 %)2 658 (6.29 %)39 (2.99 %)2011-07-14
Max Vasilev18 776117 050 (2.18 %)16 220 (2.98 %)126 (0.30 %)10 (0.77 %)2011-06-07
synelf378 473115 073 (1.93 %)6 263 (1.15 %)1 726 (4.08 %)9 (0.69 %)2011-05-19
Links254 827113 889 (1.78 %)6 289 (1.16 %)1 520 (3.59 %) 2010-06-02
Errandir231 872112 495 (1.60 %)10 390 (1.91 %)421 (1.00 %) 2011-08-05
AMDmi3133 332111 894 (1.52 %)69 (0.01 %)2 365 (5.59 %) 2011-06-24
zetx16345 493111 379 (1.46 %)8 104 (1.49 %)495 (1.17 %)40 (3.07 %)2011-08-08
veter27189 331111 204 (1.43 %)7 969 (1.47 %)611 (1.45 %)9 (0.69 %)2011-05-11
W  H  S
250 409010 320 (1.32 %)5 010 (0.92 %)1 062 (2.51 %) 2010-05-12
12rus261 17317 833 (1.00 %)6 208 (1.14 %)325 (0.77 %) 2011-06-25
Upliner67 66817 613 (0.97 %)7 498 (1.38 %)23 (0.05 %) 2009-12-12
m72mixa468 24616 783 (0.87 %)3 393 (0.62 %)674 (1.59 %)1 (0.08 %)2011-06-27
hj2366 41016 590 (0.84 %)3 780 (0.70 %)562 (1.33 %) 2011-06-28
ikz174 42015 788 (0.74 %)4 893 (0.90 %)163 (0.39 %)4 (0.31 %)2011-08-05
lzhl98 09915 660 (0.72 %)2 285 (0.42 %)567 (1.34 %)27 (2.07 %)2011-07-18
LInfo378 75314 619 (0.59 %)2 249 (0.41 %)458 (1.08 %)4 (0.31 %)2011-05-31
Monitor222 23713 224 (0.41 %)2 459 (0.45 %)125 (0.30 %)7 (0.54 %)2011-08-01
ArtemVN298 11312 741 (0.35 %)1 876 (0.35 %)173 (0.41 %) 2011-07-30
Antisida395 22812 367 (0.30 %)192 (0.04 %)419 (0.99 %)4 (0.31 %)2011-06-26
travoltino432 36212 286 (0.29 %)1 116 (0.21 %)226 (0.53 %)2 (0.15 %)2011-04-14
wec327 17712 271 (0.29 %)2 096 (0.39 %)35 (0.08 %) 2010-09-11
pokryshkin90 18512 237 (0.29 %)1 012 (0.19 %)241 (0.57 %)1 (0.08 %)2011-03-07
lehalukoil407 01512 137 (0.27 %)862 (0.16 %)255 (0.60 %) 2011-04-20
old_Bibigon71 98112 107 (0.27 %)1 777 (0.33 %)50 (0.12 %)4 (0.31 %)2010-12-01
katpatuka17 49711 790 (0.23 %)1 735 (0.32 %)11 (0.03 %) 2010-06-27
BIT427 61911 638 (0.21 %)838 (0.15 %)160 (0.38 %) 2011-03-28
mishka100380 50811 490 (0.19 %)230 (0.04 %)244 (0.58 %)2 (0.15 %)2011-01-04
Alexey Illarionov423 57211 369 (0.18 %)519 (0.10 %)166 (0.39 %)1 (0.08 %)2011-06-08
W  H  S
99 56801 330 (0.17 %)590 (0.11 %)148 (0.35 %) 2010-09-18
Jenya437 43511 056 (0.14 %)356 (0.07 %)140 (0.33 %) 2011-08-05
Электромеханик469 43911 009 (0.13 %)669 (0.12 %)68 (0.16 %) 2011-06-16
xybot70 6961989 (0.13 %)4 (0.00 %)197 (0.47 %) 2011-06-24
rocketfly444 0411874 (0.11 %)859 (0.16 %)3 (0.01 %) 2011-04-25
Dmitrij134 2841827 (0.11 %)787 (0.14 %)8 (0.02 %) 2011-01-07
mr_x264 8651757 (0.10 %)282 (0.05 %)95 (0.22 %) 2010-04-26
Nikita12381 6411756 (0.10 %)661 (0.12 %)19 (0.04 %) 2010-12-11
benderboy220 3461747 (0.10 %)352 (0.06 %)79 (0.19 %) 2010-03-07
MatWay154 5701675 (0.09 %)610 (0.11 %)13 (0.03 %) 2010-08-14
trolleway397 3261624 (0.08 %)134 (0.02 %)98 (0.23 %) 2011-06-29
AHTOH204 5621585 (0.07 %)555 (0.10 %)6 (0.01 %) 2010-09-22
Maxim Kraev248 3021553 (0.07 %)183 (0.03 %)74 (0.18 %) 2011-02-07
Aleksandr Dezhin12 4941397 (0.05 %)32 (0.01 %)1 (0.00 %)18 (1.38 %)2011-08-03

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!