OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Якутия

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-08-10, archive: 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1781 077 (89.82 %)22 787 (2.62 %)803 864 (92.44 %)
last edit64 144 (7.38 %)1 583 (0.18 %)65 727 (7.56 %)
v1 + last edit845 221 (97.20 %)24 370 (2.80 %)869 591 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v121 567 (75.80 %)665 (2.34 %)22 232 (78.14 %)
last edit6 165 (21.67 %)55 (0.19 %)6 220 (21.86 %)
v1 + last edit27 732 (97.47 %)720 (2.53 %)28 452 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1867 (70.32 %)3 (0.24 %)870 (70.56 %)
last edit356 (28.87 %)7 (0.57 %)363 (29.44 %)
v1 + last edit1 223 (99.19 %)10 (0.81 %)1 233 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 153 (90.00 %)17 (10.00 %)170 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):90.00% 97.20%97.47%99.19% 
mikes6 2701311 182 (30.02 %)272 957 (31.39 %)7 397 (26.00 %)62 (5.03 %)2008-09-26
katpatuka17 4971211 021 (20.36 %)205 896 (23.68 %)913 (3.21 %)28 (2.27 %)2010-07-07
Ivan Komarov69 864181 037 (7.82 %)74 727 (8.59 %)1 250 (4.39 %)3 (0.24 %)2010-07-24
Hind79 836178 906 (7.61 %)52 076 (5.99 %)4 610 (16.20 %)189 (15.33 %)2011-06-12
Aleksandr Dezhin12 494149 707 (4.80 %)48 962 (5.63 %)81 (0.28 %)17 (1.38 %)2011-08-06
AAlex319 192142 509 (4.10 %)23 189 (2.67 %)3 856 (13.55 %)2 (0.16 %)2011-08-01
evg794333 639131 293 (3.02 %)21 698 (2.50 %)1 887 (6.63 %)8 (0.65 %)2011-01-17
ppeta82 083122 676 (2.19 %)14 196 (1.63 %)1 232 (4.33 %)116 (9.41 %)2011-07-10
MichaelCollinson308121 719 (2.10 %)20 149 (2.32 %)310 (1.09 %)1 (0.08 %)2010-01-28
Thomas Walraet1 308116 698 (1.61 %)15 258 (1.75 %)288 (1.01 %) 2008-03-03
AMDmi3133 332115 285 (1.47 %)6 105 (0.70 %)1 368 (4.81 %)117 (9.49 %)2011-06-24
Zambelli Limitada30 854115 205 (1.47 %)15 205 (1.75 %)  2008-10-09
malenki39 504114 468 (1.40 %)11 978 (1.38 %)458 (1.61 %)10 (0.81 %)2011-06-11
W  H  S
20 587-113 024 (1.26 %)11 604 (1.33 %)280 (0.98 %)1 (0.08 %)2010-11-23
colebatch184 086112 983 (1.25 %)10 823 (1.24 %)424 (1.49 %)2 (0.16 %)2011-06-23
Obscured345 91818 856 (0.85 %)8 126 (0.93 %)138 (0.49 %)2 (0.16 %)2011-03-12
Dennis Apter180 46217 860 (0.76 %)  393 (31.87 %)2011-07-25
W  H  S
16 922-15 850 (0.56 %)4 335 (0.50 %)299 (1.05 %)1 (0.08 %)2010-01-18
jstein31 31915 681 (0.55 %)4 816 (0.55 %)129 (0.45 %)11 (0.89 %)2011-03-31
Magomogo237 04514 979 (0.48 %)2 534 (0.29 %)485 (1.70 %)1 (0.08 %)2011-03-07
OldIvantey314 21114 640 (0.45 %)4 300 (0.49 %)44 (0.15 %)6 (0.49 %)2011-04-09
delph224 77413 544 (0.34 %)1 799 (0.21 %)341 (1.20 %)2 (0.16 %)2011-02-09
maximus071462 18313 248 (0.31 %)1 678 (0.19 %)314 (1.10 %) 2011-06-10
W  H  S
224 77003 201 (0.31 %)2 761 (0.32 %)88 (0.31 %) 2011-03-05
Belacqua261 64012 856 (0.28 %)2 221 (0.26 %)127 (0.45 %) 2010-04-28
datalogg105 51212 844 (0.27 %)2 544 (0.29 %)60 (0.21 %) 2009-08-19
W  H  S
210 28602 827 (0.27 %)2 657 (0.31 %)10 (0.04 %)6 (0.49 %)2010-03-01
Andreyy449 22312 709 (0.26 %)1 914 (0.22 %)159 (0.56 %) 2011-06-06
PA9445 02712 612 (0.25 %)192 (0.02 %)452 (1.59 %)8 (0.65 %)2011-04-01
glebius94 78612 260 (0.22 %)35 (0.00 %)265 (0.93 %)45 (3.65 %)2011-02-02
Z440236 12912 204 (0.21 %)1 859 (0.21 %)65 (0.23 %)1 (0.08 %)2011-03-22
Amper418 31112 169 (0.21 %)1 129 (0.13 %)208 (0.73 %) 2011-07-28
Kuprienko_Viktor162 22312 155 (0.21 %)1 825 (0.21 %)58 (0.20 %)2 (0.16 %)2010-06-02
CygnusOlor8 29011 933 (0.19 %)1 493 (0.17 %)84 (0.30 %)1 (0.08 %)2011-07-25
Heinz_V91 49011 320 (0.13 %)1 315 (0.15 %)1 (0.00 %) 2010-02-23
W  H  S
36 809-11 317 (0.13 %)1 192 (0.14 %)21 (0.07 %)1 (0.08 %)2009-11-11
W  H  S
52 82401 164 (0.11 %)1 129 (0.13 %)7 (0.02 %) 2009-11-26
dieterdreist26 13911 147 (0.11 %)1 072 (0.12 %)11 (0.04 %)1 (0.08 %)2011-08-01
alv4 66011 104 (0.11 %)1 024 (0.12 %)12 (0.04 %)1 (0.08 %)2011-02-17
LexIgnatov316 86811 079 (0.10 %)1 044 (0.12 %)3 (0.01 %)1 (0.08 %)2010-10-19
greecemapper23 78511 022 (0.10 %)937 (0.11 %)17 (0.06 %) 2011-06-18
chilin127 49411 018 (0.10 %)943 (0.11 %)11 (0.04 %)1 (0.08 %)2010-06-29
dimuzz155 07911 015 (0.10 %)950 (0.11 %)13 (0.05 %) 2011-08-08
Upliner67 66811 012 (0.10 %)1 007 (0.12 %)1 (0.00 %) 2008-12-14
Andre6831 2311939 (0.09 %)444 (0.05 %)95 (0.33 %)1 (0.08 %)2011-06-02
Jocelyn8 8341827 (0.08 %)742 (0.09 %)17 (0.06 %) 2008-03-18
Ordin386 5081762 (0.07 %)292 (0.03 %)94 (0.33 %) 2011-03-20
luch86266 0921760 (0.07 %)  38 (3.08 %)2011-05-03
pankdm329 8331757 (0.07 %)687 (0.08 %)14 (0.05 %) 2011-07-07
Scaurr0ck351 2751751 (0.07 %)1 (0.00 %)70 (0.25 %)20 (1.62 %)2011-08-02
Alexandr Zeinalov161 4761680 (0.07 %)  34 (2.76 %)2011-07-23
bp0106204 5961500 (0.05 %)  25 (2.03 %)2011-04-02
lvv1960135 1381260 (0.03 %)  13 (1.05 %)2011-08-05
AkMeR11 0491242 (0.02 %)17 (0.00 %)5 (0.02 %)10 (0.81 %)2010-02-28

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!