OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Сахалинская область

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	297 377 (84.90 %)	169 (0.05 %)	297 546 (84.95 %)
last edit	52 622 (15.02 %)	90 (0.03 %)	52 712 (15.05 %)
v1 + last edit	349 999 (99.93 %)	259 (0.07 %)	350 258 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	19 143 (57.63 %)	3 (0.01 %)	19 146 (57.64 %)
last edit	14 066 (42.35 %)	4 (0.01 %)	14 070 (42.36 %)
v1 + last edit	33 209 (99.98 %)	7 (0.02 %)	33 216 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	494 (66.04 %)	(0.00 %)	494 (66.04 %)
last edit	252 (33.69 %)	2 (0.27 %)	254 (33.96 %)
v1 + last edit	746 (99.73 %)	2 (0.27 %)	748 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	169 (96.57 %)	6 (3.43 %)	175 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	96.57%		99.93%	99.98%	99.73%
S_Pavlukhin	314 556	1	239 470 (45.07 %)	147 880 (42.22 %)	18 254 (54.96 %)	16 (2.14 %)	2012-02-16
StAL	393 930	1	25 205 (4.74 %)	18 985 (5.42 %)	1 240 (3.73 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2011-05-28
Larchen	422 547	1	23 414 (4.41 %)	10 399 (2.97 %)	2 599 (7.82 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2011-11-26
AMDmi3	133 332	1	23 369 (4.40 %)	2 419 (0.69 %)	4 178 (12.58 %)	3 (0.40 %)	2012-03-11
Xmypblu	395 071	1	21 914 (4.12 %)	18 074 (5.16 %)	756 (2.28 %)	3 (0.40 %)	2012-03-14
Max Vasilev	18 776	1	16 163 (3.04 %)	15 308 (4.37 %)	171 (0.51 %)		2011-10-13
ikiya	69 966	1	15 613 (2.94 %)	11 323 (3.23 %)	858 (2.58 %)		2011-09-28
watao	393 606	1	14 779 (2.78 %)	13 969 (3.99 %)	162 (0.49 %)		2011-10-16
olede4	391 050	1	13 544 (2.55 %)	11 839 (3.38 %)	337 (1.01 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2012-02-23
chnav	248 768	1	12 693 (2.39 %)	8 358 (2.39 %)	831 (2.50 %)	9 (1.20 %)	2012-03-04
Jason Reid	7 774	1	12 152 (2.29 %)	11 942 (3.41 %)	42 (0.13 %)		2008-03-02
AAlex	319 192	1	11 336 (2.13 %)	7 516 (2.15 %)	764 (2.30 %)		2012-03-05
WojtekK	352 700	1	10 505 (1.98 %)	8 190 (2.34 %)	451 (1.36 %)	3 (0.40 %)	2011-10-18
Bronevichok	155 572	1	7 559 (1.42 %)	7 369 (2.10 %)	38 (0.11 %)		2012-03-06
daveemtb	19 799	1	7 444 (1.40 %)	7 444 (2.13 %)			2008-02-09
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	7 300 (1.37 %)			365 (48.80 %)	2011-10-30
djin	458 921	1	7 083 (1.33 %)	6 693 (1.91 %)	78 (0.23 %)		2011-06-13
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	6 758 (1.27 %)	5 938 (1.70 %)	48 (0.14 %)	29 (3.88 %)	2012-01-03
Felis Pimeja	260 756	1	6 684 (1.26 %)	5 839 (1.67 %)	157 (0.47 %)	3 (0.40 %)	2012-01-04
deaddy64	395 592	1	5 621 (1.06 %)	3 466 (0.99 %)	415 (1.25 %)	4 (0.53 %)	2012-03-10
katpatuka	17 497	1	4 422 (0.83 %)	4 337 (1.24 %)	17 (0.05 %)		2010-02-22
masaminh	93 901	1	4 170 (0.78 %)	3 920 (1.12 %)	50 (0.15 %)		2010-10-03
Wolfgang H	51 991	1	3 204 (0.60 %)	1 859 (0.53 %)	269 (0.81 %)		2011-04-11
Hind	79 836	1	2 260 (0.43 %)			113 (15.11 %)	2012-01-21
Keith Thomson	7 744	1	1 907 (0.36 %)	1 907 (0.54 %)			2008-01-20
yamasan	32 308	1	1 668 (0.31 %)	983 (0.28 %)	137 (0.41 %)		2011-06-09
Vadim Zudkin	177 747	1	1 578 (0.30 %)	1 218 (0.35 %)	72 (0.22 %)		2010-09-21
vebeer	614 925	1	1 447 (0.27 %)	797 (0.23 %)	130 (0.39 %)		2012-03-07
Anivchanin	525 820	1	1 251 (0.24 %)	626 (0.18 %)	125 (0.38 %)		2011-11-09
dbusse	149 876	1	1 193 (0.22 %)	1 103 (0.31 %)	18 (0.05 %)		2011-11-03
dkiselev	230 942	1	1 121 (0.21 %)	1 096 (0.31 %)	5 (0.02 %)		2011-11-07
caesium	30 157	1	1 069 (0.20 %)	1 039 (0.30 %)	6 (0.02 %)		2010-05-14
one_half_3544	95 117	1	964 (0.18 %)	819 (0.23 %)	29 (0.09 %)		2011-03-13
gr2y	430 959	1	895 (0.17 %)	330 (0.09 %)	109 (0.33 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2012-03-13
trolleway	397 326	1	876 (0.16 %)	416 (0.12 %)	92 (0.28 %)		2011-05-25
andrru	502 627	1	843 (0.16 %)	773 (0.22 %)	14 (0.04 %)		2011-08-08
Sergey Astakhov	143 266	1	815 (0.15 %)		163 (0.49 %)		2011-12-14
Tshikey	234 839	1	779 (0.15 %)	754 (0.22 %)	5 (0.02 %)		2011-01-02
luch86	266 092	1	760 (0.14 %)			38 (5.08 %)	2012-02-07
luiswoo	311 318	1	671 (0.13 %)	631 (0.18 %)	8 (0.02 %)		2011-09-28
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	640 (0.12 %)			32 (4.28 %)	2011-10-28
iPhonin	200 243	1	634 (0.12 %)	504 (0.14 %)	26 (0.08 %)		2011-07-25
jth	1 777	1	592 (0.11 %)	587 (0.17 %)	1 (0.00 %)		2008-04-12
parukhin	519 501	1	567 (0.11 %)	37 (0.01 %)	74 (0.22 %)	8 (1.07 %)	2012-02-26
Zover_blg	376 045	1	526 (0.10 %)	526 (0.15 %)			2010-11-28
Upliner	67 668	1	521 (0.10 %)	521 (0.15 %)			2009-03-13
bp0106	204 596	1	480 (0.09 %)			24 (3.21 %)	2012-02-08
RSergei	432 509	1	460 (0.09 %)			23 (3.07 %)	2012-01-24

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

96.57%

99.93%

99.98%

99.73%

S_Pavlukhin

314 556

239 470 (45.07 %)

147 880 (42.22 %)

18 254 (54.96 %)

16 (2.14 %)

2012-02-16

StAL

393 930

25 205 (4.74 %)

18 985 (5.42 %)

1 240 (3.73 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2011-05-28

Larchen

422 547

23 414 (4.41 %)

10 399 (2.97 %)

2 599 (7.82 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2011-11-26

AMDmi3

133 332

23 369 (4.40 %)

2 419 (0.69 %)

4 178 (12.58 %)

3 (0.40 %)

2012-03-11

Xmypblu

395 071

21 914 (4.12 %)

18 074 (5.16 %)

756 (2.28 %)

3 (0.40 %)

2012-03-14

Max Vasilev

18 776

16 163 (3.04 %)

15 308 (4.37 %)

171 (0.51 %)

2011-10-13

ikiya

69 966

15 613 (2.94 %)

11 323 (3.23 %)

858 (2.58 %)

2011-09-28

watao

393 606

14 779 (2.78 %)

13 969 (3.99 %)

162 (0.49 %)

2011-10-16

olede4

391 050

13 544 (2.55 %)

11 839 (3.38 %)

337 (1.01 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2012-02-23

chnav

248 768

12 693 (2.39 %)

8 358 (2.39 %)

831 (2.50 %)

9 (1.20 %)

2012-03-04

Jason Reid

7 774

12 152 (2.29 %)

11 942 (3.41 %)

42 (0.13 %)

2008-03-02

AAlex

319 192

11 336 (2.13 %)

7 516 (2.15 %)

764 (2.30 %)

2012-03-05

WojtekK

352 700

10 505 (1.98 %)

8 190 (2.34 %)

451 (1.36 %)

3 (0.40 %)

2011-10-18

Bronevichok

155 572

7 559 (1.42 %)

7 369 (2.10 %)

38 (0.11 %)

2012-03-06

daveemtb

19 799

7 444 (1.40 %)

7 444 (2.13 %)

2008-02-09

Dennis Apter

180 462

7 300 (1.37 %)

365 (48.80 %)

2011-10-30

djin

458 921

7 083 (1.33 %)

6 693 (1.91 %)

78 (0.23 %)

2011-06-13

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

6 758 (1.27 %)

5 938 (1.70 %)

48 (0.14 %)

29 (3.88 %)

2012-01-03

Felis Pimeja

260 756

6 684 (1.26 %)

5 839 (1.67 %)

157 (0.47 %)

3 (0.40 %)

2012-01-04

deaddy64

395 592

5 621 (1.06 %)

3 466 (0.99 %)

415 (1.25 %)

4 (0.53 %)

2012-03-10

katpatuka

17 497

4 422 (0.83 %)

4 337 (1.24 %)

17 (0.05 %)

2010-02-22

masaminh

93 901

4 170 (0.78 %)

3 920 (1.12 %)

50 (0.15 %)

2010-10-03

Wolfgang H

51 991

3 204 (0.60 %)

1 859 (0.53 %)

269 (0.81 %)

2011-04-11

Hind

79 836

2 260 (0.43 %)

113 (15.11 %)

2012-01-21

Keith Thomson

7 744

1 907 (0.36 %)

1 907 (0.54 %)

2008-01-20

yamasan

32 308

1 668 (0.31 %)

983 (0.28 %)

137 (0.41 %)

2011-06-09

Vadim Zudkin

177 747

1 578 (0.30 %)

1 218 (0.35 %)

72 (0.22 %)

2010-09-21

vebeer

614 925

1 447 (0.27 %)

797 (0.23 %)

130 (0.39 %)

2012-03-07

Anivchanin

525 820

1 251 (0.24 %)

626 (0.18 %)

125 (0.38 %)

2011-11-09

dbusse

149 876

1 193 (0.22 %)

1 103 (0.31 %)

18 (0.05 %)

2011-11-03

dkiselev

230 942

1 121 (0.21 %)

1 096 (0.31 %)

5 (0.02 %)

2011-11-07

caesium

30 157

1 069 (0.20 %)

1 039 (0.30 %)

6 (0.02 %)

2010-05-14

one_half_3544

95 117

964 (0.18 %)

819 (0.23 %)

29 (0.09 %)

2011-03-13

gr2y

430 959

895 (0.17 %)

330 (0.09 %)

109 (0.33 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2012-03-13

trolleway

397 326

876 (0.16 %)

416 (0.12 %)

92 (0.28 %)

2011-05-25

andrru

502 627

843 (0.16 %)

773 (0.22 %)

14 (0.04 %)

2011-08-08

Sergey Astakhov

143 266

815 (0.15 %)

163 (0.49 %)

2011-12-14

Tshikey

234 839

779 (0.15 %)

754 (0.22 %)

5 (0.02 %)

2011-01-02

luch86

266 092

760 (0.14 %)

38 (5.08 %)

2012-02-07

luiswoo

311 318

671 (0.13 %)

631 (0.18 %)

8 (0.02 %)

2011-09-28

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

640 (0.12 %)

32 (4.28 %)

2011-10-28

iPhonin

200 243

634 (0.12 %)

504 (0.14 %)

26 (0.08 %)

2011-07-25

jth

1 777

592 (0.11 %)

587 (0.17 %)

1 (0.00 %)

2008-04-12

parukhin

519 501

567 (0.11 %)

37 (0.01 %)

74 (0.22 %)

8 (1.07 %)

2012-02-26

Zover_blg

376 045

526 (0.10 %)

526 (0.15 %)

2010-11-28

Upliner

67 668

521 (0.10 %)

521 (0.15 %)

2009-03-13

bp0106

204 596

480 (0.09 %)

24 (3.21 %)

2012-02-08

RSergei

432 509

460 (0.09 %)

23 (3.07 %)

2012-01-24

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.