OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Саратовская область

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-12-28, archive: 2011-12-15, 2011-11-23, 2011-11-09, 2011-10-25, 2011-10-13, 2011-09-27, 2011-09-13, 2011-09-06, 2011-08-30, 2011-08-23, 2011-08-16, 2011-08-10, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1413 777 (81.74 %)1 483 (0.29 %)415 260 (82.03 %)
last edit89 830 (17.75 %)1 119 (0.22 %)90 949 (17.97 %)
v1 + last edit503 607 (99.49 %)2 602 (0.51 %)506 209 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v133 840 (49.01 %)49 (0.07 %)33 889 (49.08 %)
last edit35 136 (50.89 %)20 (0.03 %)35 156 (50.92 %)
v1 + last edit68 976 (99.90 %)69 (0.10 %)69 045 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1770 (71.23 %) (0.00 %)770 (71.23 %)
last edit310 (28.68 %)1 (0.09 %)311 (28.77 %)
v1 + last edit1 080 (99.91 %)1 (0.09 %)1 081 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 328 (95.35 %)16 (4.65 %)344 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):95.35% 99.49%99.90%99.91% 
Butt128 6111197 872 (22.66 %)105 862 (20.91 %)18 306 (26.51 %)24 (2.22 %)2011-12-23
faxtrot_sit497 0571196 735 (22.53 %)106 960 (21.13 %)17 923 (25.96 %)8 (0.74 %)2011-12-26
gps-Max200 618155 567 (6.36 %)41 637 (8.23 %)2 722 (3.94 %)16 (1.48 %)2011-07-03
lamaur377 142133 213 (3.80 %)20 453 (4.04 %)2 548 (3.69 %)1 (0.09 %)2011-03-07
AMDmi3133 332130 897 (3.54 %)12 017 (2.37 %)3 512 (5.09 %)66 (6.11 %)2011-12-26
Eugene26 260124 781 (2.84 %)17 206 (3.40 %)1 515 (2.19 %) 2011-03-31
Картостроитель367 046122 566 (2.58 %)16 496 (3.26 %)1 190 (1.72 %)6 (0.56 %)2011-11-07
okolobaxa212 385121 855 (2.50 %)4 825 (0.95 %)3 406 (4.93 %) 2011-11-17
Genix96 934114 686 (1.68 %)9 011 (1.78 %)1 135 (1.64 %) 2011-11-30
asdqweasd421 825114 117 (1.62 %)8 707 (1.72 %)1 010 (1.46 %)18 (1.67 %)2011-12-26
klim356574 138113 395 (1.53 %) 2 679 (3.88 %) 2011-12-26
d1g214 697111 174 (1.28 %)494 (0.10 %)2 136 (3.09 %) 2011-05-28
Telepuz436 277110 980 (1.26 %)5 865 (1.16 %)955 (1.38 %)17 (1.57 %)2011-07-17
vinnipushkin407 701110 907 (1.25 %)8 307 (1.64 %)516 (0.75 %)1 (0.09 %)2011-04-15
serikst144 744110 556 (1.21 %)10 116 (2.00 %)88 (0.13 %) 2010-11-27
Diereq418 939110 199 (1.17 %)8 109 (1.60 %)410 (0.59 %)2 (0.19 %)2011-07-01
atgnclk164 64519 380 (1.07 %)8 280 (1.64 %)196 (0.28 %)6 (0.56 %)2011-01-29
Boris72432 56519 363 (1.07 %)5 298 (1.05 %)809 (1.17 %)1 (0.09 %)2011-12-08
Aleksandr Dezhin12 49418 024 (0.92 %)5 369 (1.06 %)199 (0.29 %)83 (7.68 %)2011-11-26
Dennis Apter180 46217 500 (0.86 %)  375 (34.69 %)2011-10-30
JekaVGG183 05017 347 (0.84 %)4 692 (0.93 %)235 (0.34 %)74 (6.85 %)2011-12-26
liosha11 13217 261 (0.83 %)6 531 (1.29 %)142 (0.21 %)1 (0.09 %)2010-09-30
tmprec136 19817 185 (0.82 %)6 660 (1.32 %)105 (0.15 %) 2010-06-16
ildar154 47117 163 (0.82 %)6 248 (1.23 %)183 (0.27 %) 2010-12-10
gentoid492 77117 121 (0.82 %)4 896 (0.97 %)317 (0.46 %)32 (2.96 %)2011-12-08
Scaurr0ck351 27517 001 (0.80 %)6 616 (1.31 %)65 (0.09 %)3 (0.28 %)2011-11-11
yur788438 42216 398 (0.73 %)3 403 (0.67 %)599 (0.87 %) 2011-07-03
Kachkaev231 45114 742 (0.54 %)3 137 (0.62 %)305 (0.44 %)4 (0.37 %)2011-10-07
Koralexey228 41414 230 (0.48 %)2 840 (0.56 %)278 (0.40 %) 2011-12-09
alexnovo420 59314 154 (0.48 %)2 929 (0.58 %)229 (0.33 %)4 (0.37 %)2011-04-02
Obscured345 91813 997 (0.46 %)2 862 (0.57 %)227 (0.33 %) 2011-10-28
jon06544 57113 912 (0.45 %)1 607 (0.32 %)461 (0.67 %) 2011-12-27
Lexx34433 03613 778 (0.43 %)1 783 (0.35 %)399 (0.58 %) 2011-11-30
OldIvantey314 21113 460 (0.40 %)2 620 (0.52 %)168 (0.24 %) 2011-11-06
katpatuka17 49713 072 (0.35 %)2 992 (0.59 %)16 (0.02 %) 2009-09-21
lzhl98 09913 057 (0.35 %)3 027 (0.60 %)2 (0.00 %)1 (0.09 %)2011-09-21
Silentium381 83612 840 (0.33 %)1 945 (0.38 %)167 (0.24 %)3 (0.28 %)2011-12-22
barkulex142 73512 460 (0.28 %)2 400 (0.47 %)12 (0.02 %) 2010-06-20
Behem0th156 31512 421 (0.28 %)1 756 (0.35 %)133 (0.19 %) 2011-07-11
Владимир Петрович551 75612 327 (0.27 %)1 907 (0.38 %)80 (0.12 %)1 (0.09 %)2011-11-30
AkMeR11 04912 168 (0.25 %)1 983 (0.39 %)1 (0.00 %)9 (0.83 %)2010-02-28
Krabuchko548 87812 025 (0.23 %)1 455 (0.29 %)110 (0.16 %)1 (0.09 %)2011-11-15
MatWay154 57012 021 (0.23 %)1 956 (0.39 %)13 (0.02 %) 2010-09-04
Hind79 83612 000 (0.23 %)  100 (9.25 %)2011-08-24
Upliner67 66811 959 (0.22 %)1 959 (0.39 %)  2009-02-14
Nik0lay508 05911 941 (0.22 %)851 (0.17 %)218 (0.32 %) 2011-09-07
X-GHOST500 09311 847 (0.21 %)922 (0.18 %)185 (0.27 %) 2011-12-26
W  H  S
98 82501 837 (0.21 %)1 587 (0.31 %)50 (0.07 %) 2009-05-21
glebius94 78611 642 (0.19 %)597 (0.12 %)185 (0.27 %)6 (0.56 %)2011-06-21
garl51 19611 586 (0.18 %)1 181 (0.23 %)81 (0.12 %) 2011-01-18
VitalyKorol465 22911 283 (0.15 %)903 (0.18 %)72 (0.10 %)1 (0.09 %)2011-07-14
AlexVK1965145 25911 258 (0.14 %)1 083 (0.21 %)35 (0.05 %) 2010-10-26
gals98 51511 242 (0.14 %)1 082 (0.21 %)28 (0.04 %)1 (0.09 %)2010-12-02
_panic_256 00111 186 (0.14 %)676 (0.13 %)102 (0.15 %) 2011-06-24
Noweol464 75911 142 (0.13 %)552 (0.11 %)118 (0.17 %) 2011-07-18
ppirks324 01611 124 (0.13 %)604 (0.12 %)104 (0.15 %) 2011-04-30
fragman539 98111 073 (0.12 %)808 (0.16 %)53 (0.08 %) 2011-11-16
Zverik290 27111 022 (0.12 %)812 (0.16 %)14 (0.02 %)7 (0.65 %)2011-10-12
vjuen450 0911989 (0.11 %)794 (0.16 %)39 (0.06 %) 2011-06-19
(((Cronos)))508 8911980 (0.11 %)250 (0.05 %)146 (0.21 %) 2011-10-20
Scondo421 5241955 (0.11 %) 191 (0.28 %) 2011-12-16
DaemonS473 3121931 (0.11 %)466 (0.09 %)93 (0.13 %) 2011-06-22
Chrizalid362 5221880 (0.10 %)725 (0.14 %)31 (0.04 %) 2011-02-09
dedNikifor142 7761832 (0.10 %)582 (0.11 %)50 (0.07 %) 2010-09-02
nix303462 7521746 (0.09 %)236 (0.05 %)102 (0.15 %) 2011-10-25
luch86266 0921720 (0.08 %)  36 (3.33 %)2011-05-03
TR764462 3081681 (0.08 %)616 (0.12 %)13 (0.02 %) 2011-06-01
АндрейМ419 1951672 (0.08 %)317 (0.06 %)71 (0.10 %) 2011-10-01
zgremlin52 1541644 (0.07 %)584 (0.12 %)12 (0.02 %) 2010-07-05
Alexandr Zeinalov161 4761640 (0.07 %)  32 (2.96 %)2011-10-28
xybot70 6961557 (0.06 %)32 (0.01 %)101 (0.15 %)1 (0.09 %)2011-12-10
bp0106204 5961420 (0.05 %)  21 (1.94 %)2011-04-02
Sergey Astakhov143 2661341 (0.04 %)1 (0.00 %)68 (0.10 %) 2011-12-14
RSergei432 5091340 (0.04 %)  17 (1.57 %)2011-10-26
lvv1960135 1381280 (0.03 %)  14 (1.30 %)2011-09-29

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!