OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Тамбовская область

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-08-23, archive: 2011-08-16, 2011-08-10, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1167 767 (82.47 %)478 (0.23 %)168 245 (82.70 %)
last edit35 128 (17.27 %)62 (0.03 %)35 190 (17.30 %)
v1 + last edit202 895 (99.73 %)540 (0.27 %)203 435 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v117 489 (78.79 %)45 (0.20 %)17 534 (78.99 %)
last edit4 628 (20.85 %)36 (0.16 %)4 664 (21.01 %)
v1 + last edit22 117 (99.64 %)81 (0.36 %)22 198 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1254 (57.21 %)3 (0.68 %)257 (57.88 %)
last edit187 (42.12 %)0 (0.00 %)187 (42.12 %)
v1 + last edit441 (99.32 %)3 (0.68 %)444 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 176 (93.62 %)12 (6.38 %)188 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):93.62% 99.73%99.64%99.32% 
Варяг213 199184 989 (26.29 %)43 919 (21.59 %)7 054 (31.78 %)290 (65.32 %)2011-08-21
dik_man241 531178 609 (24.31 %)48 474 (23.83 %)5 967 (26.88 %)15 (3.38 %)2011-08-01
_panic_256 001127 754 (8.58 %)17 794 (8.75 %)1 988 (8.96 %)1 (0.23 %)2011-08-03
PP82341 567116 355 (5.06 %)13 575 (6.67 %)528 (2.38 %)7 (1.58 %)2011-07-06
Sanchis250 448114 696 (4.55 %)8 786 (4.32 %)1 182 (5.32 %) 2011-05-15
Rom@n182 606111 761 (3.64 %)8 131 (4.00 %)666 (3.00 %)15 (3.38 %)2011-08-01
BK_man242 35218 187 (2.53 %)6 927 (3.41 %)220 (0.99 %)8 (1.80 %)2011-06-24
EZZ368 93516 215 (1.92 %)4 930 (2.42 %)257 (1.16 %) 2010-12-24
glebius94 78615 628 (1.74 %)5 433 (2.67 %)39 (0.18 %) 2010-12-06
MTikhomirov436 32215 269 (1.63 %)4 709 (2.31 %)108 (0.49 %)1 (0.23 %)2011-08-19
Vovan-brn379 34315 046 (1.56 %)3 506 (1.72 %)308 (1.39 %) 2011-05-27
elmar1437 24514 770 (1.48 %)2 440 (1.20 %)462 (2.08 %)1 (0.23 %)2011-08-15
elagin315 64613 822 (1.18 %)3 102 (1.52 %)144 (0.65 %) 2010-09-18
AMDmi3133 33213 792 (1.17 %)12 (0.01 %)752 (3.39 %)1 (0.23 %)2011-08-15
Ser-X371 08012 774 (0.86 %)1 939 (0.95 %)167 (0.75 %) 2011-08-13
hint347 92912 748 (0.85 %)2 658 (1.31 %)14 (0.06 %)1 (0.23 %)2011-08-20
akoruno313 21512 643 (0.82 %)1 983 (0.97 %)128 (0.58 %)1 (0.23 %)2011-07-01
OldIvantey314 21112 633 (0.81 %)1 733 (0.85 %)160 (0.72 %)5 (1.13 %)2011-08-06
LogOff208 89212 100 (0.65 %)615 (0.30 %)149 (0.67 %)37 (8.33 %)2011-07-12
Nemo082345 79412 004 (0.62 %)1 564 (0.77 %)88 (0.40 %) 2011-07-12
patashnik297 35811 897 (0.59 %)1 372 (0.67 %)53 (0.24 %)13 (2.93 %)2011-08-21
Nehalem504 65511 416 (0.44 %)751 (0.37 %)133 (0.60 %) 2011-08-15
Popovich76484 96711 374 (0.42 %)929 (0.46 %)89 (0.40 %) 2011-07-27
agsochi233 12511 259 (0.39 %)1 069 (0.53 %)34 (0.15 %)1 (0.23 %)2011-05-23
keepon409 27911 136 (0.35 %)506 (0.25 %)126 (0.57 %) 2011-02-24
Aleksandr Dezhin12 49411 042 (0.32 %)872 (0.43 %)18 (0.08 %)4 (0.90 %)2011-08-21
Nac205246 5851994 (0.31 %)889 (0.44 %)17 (0.08 %)1 (0.23 %)2011-06-14
Butt128 6111935 (0.29 %)655 (0.32 %)56 (0.25 %) 2011-05-03
Zverik290 2711919 (0.28 %)689 (0.34 %)46 (0.21 %) 2010-08-20
katpatuka17 4971887 (0.27 %)872 (0.43 %)3 (0.01 %) 2009-05-22
Upliner67 6681838 (0.26 %)823 (0.40 %)3 (0.01 %) 2009-10-03
Felis Pimeja260 7561819 (0.25 %)619 (0.30 %)16 (0.07 %)6 (1.35 %)2011-08-02
zhirukhin71 1511816 (0.25 %)786 (0.39 %)6 (0.03 %) 2011-07-17
Leex427 5151792 (0.24 %)442 (0.22 %)70 (0.32 %) 2011-03-27
loir127 6061783 (0.24 %)628 (0.31 %)23 (0.10 %)2 (0.45 %)2011-01-17
sax10368 5061766 (0.24 %)701 (0.34 %)13 (0.06 %) 2010-12-09
KekcuHa30 5901729 (0.23 %)374 (0.18 %)71 (0.32 %) 2010-07-13
W  H  S
183 5140727 (0.22 %)322 (0.16 %)69 (0.31 %)3 (0.68 %)2010-09-30
mixa339 3361660 (0.20 %)305 (0.15 %)71 (0.32 %) 2011-04-04
Ilyin19356 3911578 (0.18 %)243 (0.12 %)67 (0.30 %) 2011-07-23
LeXoR391 4271390 (0.12 %) 14 (0.06 %)16 (3.60 %)2011-01-11

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!