OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Томская область

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:
  1. First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
  2. check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
  3. do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)
Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Created on: 2011-10-25, archive: 2011-10-13, 2011-09-27, 2011-09-13, 2011-09-06, 2011-08-30, 2011-08-23, 2011-08-16, 2011-08-10, 2011-07-27

Nodes
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1530 208 (89.88 %)4 201 (0.71 %)534 409 (90.59 %)
last edit54 176 (9.18 %)1 329 (0.23 %)55 505 (9.41 %)
v1 + last edit584 384 (99.06 %)5 530 (0.94 %)589 914 (100.00 %)
 
Ways
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v148 298 (77.88 %)273 (0.44 %)48 571 (78.32 %)
last edit13 359 (21.54 %)85 (0.14 %)13 444 (21.68 %)
v1 + last edit61 657 (99.42 %)358 (0.58 %)62 015 (100.00 %)
 
Relations
 ODbLCCODbL + CC
v1425 (68.22 %) (0.00 %)425 (68.22 %)
last edit197 (31.62 %)1 (0.16 %)198 (31.78 %)
v1 + last edit622 (99.84 %)1 (0.16 %)623 (100.00 %)
 
Contributors
 189 (92.65 %)15 (7.35 %)204 (100.00 %)
Legend
X  
   
Y Z

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

 

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
 
User²uidODbL³OSM merit⁴nodes⁵ways⁵relations⁵last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):92.65% 99.06%99.42%99.84% 
tashka3438 3951555 463 (60.88 %)329 193 (55.80 %)45 254 (72.97 %) 2011-09-24
iPhonin200 243176 942 (8.43 %)60 032 (10.18 %)3 322 (5.36 %)15 (2.41 %)2011-10-22
afonin22 108147 843 (5.24 %)42 668 (7.23 %)1 007 (1.62 %)7 (1.12 %)2011-10-21
sfedor353 114138 295 (4.20 %)20 065 (3.40 %)3 482 (5.61 %)41 (6.58 %)2011-10-22
katpatuka17 497127 484 (3.01 %)26 934 (4.57 %)106 (0.17 %)1 (0.16 %)2010-10-01
Nicolai52 200116 855 (1.85 %)10 770 (1.83 %)1 133 (1.83 %)21 (3.37 %)2011-08-17
pankdm329 833114 822 (1.62 %)13 352 (2.26 %)242 (0.39 %)13 (2.09 %)2011-09-10
i_r_a441 215114 583 (1.60 %)9 338 (1.58 %)969 (1.56 %)20 (3.21 %)2011-10-09
ImmortAlex215 962112 622 (1.38 %)12 242 (2.08 %)72 (0.12 %)1 (0.16 %)2011-06-13
Aleksandr Dezhin12 49419 544 (1.05 %)9 254 (1.57 %)34 (0.05 %)6 (0.96 %)2011-09-22
Miroff217 89917 271 (0.80 %)5 276 (0.89 %)239 (0.39 %)40 (6.42 %)2011-10-06
W  H  S
38 564-16 409 (0.70 %)4 724 (0.80 %)337 (0.54 %) 2011-02-06
Dennis Apter180 46216 380 (0.70 %)  319 (51.20 %)2011-07-25
Stalker61402 31915 736 (0.63 %)5 021 (0.85 %)139 (0.22 %)1 (0.16 %)2011-10-11
SolTomsk298 49715 178 (0.57 %)2 488 (0.42 %)534 (0.86 %)1 (0.16 %)2011-10-23
AMDmi3133 33214 275 (0.47 %)10 (0.00 %)757 (1.22 %)24 (3.85 %)2011-08-16
aos1986307 92413 970 (0.44 %)2 150 (0.36 %)340 (0.55 %)6 (0.96 %)2011-05-27
garikaa385 87713 529 (0.39 %)2 139 (0.36 %)274 (0.44 %)1 (0.16 %)2011-08-31
Muxruk498 87813 455 (0.38 %)1 940 (0.33 %)303 (0.49 %) 2011-10-18
Max Vasilev18 77613 352 (0.37 %)42 (0.01 %)662 (1.07 %) 2011-10-13
turula487 22613 160 (0.35 %)2 690 (0.46 %)94 (0.15 %) 2011-07-22
andrewK453 46412 921 (0.32 %)2 901 (0.49 %)4 (0.01 %) 2011-05-18
niro348 50612 918 (0.32 %)2 088 (0.35 %)146 (0.24 %)5 (0.80 %)2011-07-03
Upliner67 66812 465 (0.27 %)2 445 (0.41 %) 1 (0.16 %)2008-11-03
siberiano237 04912 231 (0.24 %)1 731 (0.29 %)88 (0.14 %)3 (0.48 %)2011-09-19
asbam489 12512 157 (0.24 %)1 072 (0.18 %)217 (0.35 %) 2011-09-21
GoodOk290 25311 923 (0.21 %)778 (0.13 %)221 (0.36 %)2 (0.32 %)2011-10-20
Magomogo237 04511 806 (0.20 %)1 426 (0.24 %)68 (0.11 %)2 (0.32 %)2011-03-23
CyrusDreams45 43911 606 (0.18 %)1 066 (0.18 %)108 (0.17 %) 2011-10-23
Проходимец152 44111 502 (0.16 %)1 077 (0.18 %)85 (0.14 %) 2011-01-09
OldIvantey314 21111 463 (0.16 %)1 263 (0.21 %)28 (0.05 %)3 (0.48 %)2011-09-08
Анатолий V504 37711 375 (0.15 %)945 (0.16 %)86 (0.14 %) 2011-08-29
tsvnv137 57011 209 (0.13 %)999 (0.17 %)42 (0.07 %) 2011-06-25
Ordin386 50811 188 (0.13 %)548 (0.09 %)112 (0.18 %)4 (0.64 %)2011-05-01
solovyov_aleksandr377 40311 180 (0.13 %)900 (0.15 %)56 (0.09 %) 2011-02-11
glebius94 78611 169 (0.13 %)119 (0.02 %)198 (0.32 %)3 (0.48 %)2011-09-25
ioncathode497 44511 134 (0.12 %)654 (0.11 %)96 (0.15 %) 2011-09-19
demon_h375 80411 121 (0.12 %)611 (0.10 %)22 (0.04 %)20 (3.21 %)2011-05-21
Alexey21 27211 090 (0.12 %)925 (0.16 %)17 (0.03 %)4 (0.64 %)2011-04-09
yohanson53 4681773 (0.08 %)648 (0.11 %)25 (0.04 %) 2011-10-11
yasaniok365 2531772 (0.08 %)417 (0.07 %)71 (0.11 %) 2011-05-16
W  H  S
83 2200660 (0.07 %)585 (0.10 %)15 (0.02 %) 2009-08-28
Kostik384 0841655 (0.07 %)10 (0.00 %)129 (0.21 %) 2011-10-12
Maksimka349 0871609 (0.07 %)269 (0.05 %)68 (0.11 %) 2011-09-09
old_Bibigon71 9811587 (0.06 %)547 (0.09 %)8 (0.01 %) 2010-07-10
RSergei432 5091340 (0.04 %)  17 (2.73 %)2011-10-22

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict CSS is valid!