OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Тюменская область

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	582 770 (79.89 %)	1 942 (0.27 %)	584 712 (80.16 %)
last edit	144 039 (19.75 %)	711 (0.10 %)	144 750 (19.84 %)
v1 + last edit	726 809 (99.64 %)	2 653 (0.36 %)	729 462 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	31 706 (65.57 %)	78 (0.16 %)	31 784 (65.73 %)
last edit	16 410 (33.94 %)	160 (0.33 %)	16 570 (34.27 %)
v1 + last edit	48 116 (99.51 %)	238 (0.49 %)	48 354 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	2 726 (86.08 %)	1 (0.03 %)	2 727 (86.11 %)
last edit	438 (13.83 %)	2 (0.06 %)	440 (13.89 %)
v1 + last edit	3 164 (99.91 %)	3 (0.09 %)	3 167 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	197 (90.37 %)	21 (9.63 %)	218 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	90.37%		99.64%	99.51%	99.91%
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	407 644 (39.40 %)	284 299 (38.97 %)	16 317 (33.74 %)	2 088 (65.93 %)	2011-09-23
Oksion	60 769	1	225 294 (21.78 %)	149 069 (20.44 %)	13 245 (27.39 %)	500 (15.79 %)	2011-09-06
alexfrol	12 184	1	141 275 (13.66 %)	117 795 (16.15 %)	4 148 (8.58 %)	137 (4.33 %)	2011-08-24
Stalker61	402 319	1	47 758 (4.62 %)	38 468 (5.27 %)	1 814 (3.75 %)	11 (0.35 %)	2011-09-25
AMDmi3	133 332	1	33 785 (3.27 %)	17 810 (2.44 %)	3 171 (6.56 %)	6 (0.19 %)	2011-09-21
cvuneeez	489 625	1	22 175 (2.14 %)	19 460 (2.67 %)	543 (1.12 %)		2011-09-10
stopa85	332 381	1	18 109 (1.75 %)	6 999 (0.96 %)	2 210 (4.57 %)	3 (0.09 %)	2011-06-04
katpatuka	17 497	1	13 088 (1.27 %)	12 113 (1.66 %)	191 (0.40 %)	1 (0.03 %)	2010-10-02
whalerich	183 878	1	12 630 (1.22 %)	10 945 (1.50 %)	265 (0.55 %)	18 (0.57 %)	2011-09-23
RSergei	432 509	1	10 305 (1.00 %)	4 250 (0.58 %)	1 143 (2.36 %)	17 (0.54 %)	2011-09-21
woodpeck	5 164	1	7 046 (0.68 %)	5 566 (0.76 %)	296 (0.61 %)		2008-09-12
liosha	11 132	1	6 683 (0.65 %)	6 638 (0.91 %)	5 (0.01 %)	1 (0.03 %)	2011-06-16
old_Bibigon	71 981	1	5 500 (0.53 %)	5 440 (0.75 %)	12 (0.02 %)		2010-07-10
Topchev	77 224	1	4 753 (0.46 %)	4 508 (0.62 %)	41 (0.08 %)	2 (0.06 %)	2011-06-19
savsav	416 110	1	4 186 (0.40 %)	2 606 (0.36 %)	296 (0.61 %)	5 (0.16 %)	2011-06-27
dfcz55	414 565	1	4 020 (0.39 %)	3 145 (0.43 %)	175 (0.36 %)		2011-09-16
dedNikifor	142 776	1	3 933 (0.38 %)	2 178 (0.30 %)	327 (0.68 %)	6 (0.19 %)	2011-09-21
wasiliiterkin (Тюмень)	500 670	1	3 580 (0.35 %)	2 415 (0.33 %)	233 (0.48 %)		2011-09-09
Miroff	217 899	1	3 350 (0.32 %)	2 685 (0.37 %)	49 (0.10 %)	21 (0.66 %)	2011-09-24
s0nik	336 137	1	3 345 (0.32 %)	2 515 (0.34 %)	166 (0.34 %)		2010-11-18
sa235	196 901	1	3 119 (0.30 %)	1 979 (0.27 %)	228 (0.47 %)		2011-05-06
xamal	382 023	1	2 997 (0.29 %)	2 267 (0.31 %)	98 (0.20 %)	12 (0.38 %)	2011-07-18
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	2 832 (0.27 %)	2 277 (0.31 %)	23 (0.05 %)	22 (0.69 %)	2011-09-22
Andreyt	497 469	1	2 669 (0.26 %)	959 (0.13 %)	302 (0.62 %)	10 (0.32 %)	2011-09-25
Nexor	221 087	1	2 247 (0.22 %)	2 (0.00 %)	449 (0.93 %)		2011-04-12
Hind	79 836	1	2 160 (0.21 %)			108 (3.41 %)	2011-08-25
const_st	409 763	1	1 994 (0.19 %)	1 544 (0.21 %)	86 (0.18 %)	1 (0.03 %)	2011-09-14
monkeyuser W H S	231 173	-1	1 772 (0.17 %)	1 032 (0.14 %)	148 (0.31 %)		2011-06-07
KekcuHa	30 590	1	1 736 (0.17 %)	1 566 (0.21 %)	34 (0.07 %)		2010-01-29
research72	442 130	1	1 729 (0.17 %)	344 (0.05 %)	277 (0.57 %)		2011-08-31
Ilis	127 170	1	1 674 (0.16 %)	1 219 (0.17 %)	79 (0.16 %)	3 (0.09 %)	2011-08-26
varelick	197 816	1	1 670 (0.16 %)	1 210 (0.17 %)	92 (0.19 %)		2011-07-15
Calixao	400 391	1	1 642 (0.16 %)	17 (0.00 %)	325 (0.67 %)		2011-09-07
Marker13	350 776	1	1 583 (0.15 %)	1 498 (0.21 %)	17 (0.04 %)		2011-03-04
vespex	97 421	1	1 499 (0.14 %)	1 214 (0.17 %)	29 (0.06 %)	7 (0.22 %)	2010-12-11
Проходимец	152 441	1	1 463 (0.14 %)	1 198 (0.16 %)	53 (0.11 %)		2011-02-22
trolleway	397 326	1	1 246 (0.12 %)	981 (0.13 %)	13 (0.03 %)	10 (0.32 %)	2011-09-23
Upliner	67 668	1	1 242 (0.12 %)	1 217 (0.17 %)	5 (0.01 %)		2009-02-27
Gordon2 W H S	218 558	0	1 225 (0.12 %)	1 075 (0.15 %)	22 (0.05 %)	2 (0.06 %)	2010-09-20
dkiselev	230 942	1	1 080 (0.10 %)	970 (0.13 %)	22 (0.05 %)		2011-08-15
Хмурый	447 276	1	1 051 (0.10 %)	641 (0.09 %)	74 (0.15 %)	2 (0.06 %)	2011-06-09
dnikitin	277 726	1	1 027 (0.10 %)	7 (0.00 %)	204 (0.42 %)		2011-04-12
Vaska72	90 436	1	983 (0.10 %)	943 (0.13 %)	8 (0.02 %)		2009-12-25
luch86	266 092	1	760 (0.07 %)			38 (1.20 %)	2011-05-03
demitel	148 239	1	695 (0.07 %)	370 (0.05 %)	65 (0.13 %)		2009-11-02
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	680 (0.07 %)			34 (1.07 %)	2011-07-23
Mir76	204 582	1	638 (0.06 %)	593 (0.08 %)	9 (0.02 %)		2011-03-21
glebius	94 786	1	620 (0.06 %)	180 (0.02 %)	72 (0.15 %)	4 (0.13 %)	2011-09-25
neutron	140 650	1	611 (0.06 %)	506 (0.07 %)	21 (0.04 %)		2011-03-15
theophrastos	96 069	1	560 (0.05 %)		112 (0.23 %)		2010-12-10
bp0106	204 596	1	500 (0.05 %)			25 (0.79 %)	2011-04-02
uboot	26 299	1	471 (0.05 %)	1 (0.00 %)	94 (0.19 %)		2011-01-16
Kostik	384 084	1	384 (0.04 %)	24 (0.00 %)	72 (0.15 %)		2011-08-25
lvv1960	135 138	1	260 (0.03 %)			13 (0.41 %)	2011-09-01

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

90.37%

99.64%

99.51%

99.91%

Dennis Apter

180 462

407 644 (39.40 %)

284 299 (38.97 %)

16 317 (33.74 %)

2 088 (65.93 %)

2011-09-23

Oksion

60 769

225 294 (21.78 %)

149 069 (20.44 %)

13 245 (27.39 %)

500 (15.79 %)

2011-09-06

alexfrol

12 184

141 275 (13.66 %)

117 795 (16.15 %)

4 148 (8.58 %)

137 (4.33 %)

2011-08-24

Stalker61

402 319

47 758 (4.62 %)

38 468 (5.27 %)

1 814 (3.75 %)

11 (0.35 %)

2011-09-25

AMDmi3

133 332

33 785 (3.27 %)

17 810 (2.44 %)

3 171 (6.56 %)

6 (0.19 %)

2011-09-21

cvuneeez

489 625

22 175 (2.14 %)

19 460 (2.67 %)

543 (1.12 %)

2011-09-10

stopa85

332 381

18 109 (1.75 %)

6 999 (0.96 %)

2 210 (4.57 %)

3 (0.09 %)

2011-06-04

katpatuka

17 497

13 088 (1.27 %)

12 113 (1.66 %)

191 (0.40 %)

1 (0.03 %)

2010-10-02

whalerich

183 878

12 630 (1.22 %)

10 945 (1.50 %)

265 (0.55 %)

18 (0.57 %)

2011-09-23

RSergei

432 509

10 305 (1.00 %)

4 250 (0.58 %)

1 143 (2.36 %)

17 (0.54 %)

2011-09-21

woodpeck

5 164

7 046 (0.68 %)

5 566 (0.76 %)

296 (0.61 %)

2008-09-12

liosha

11 132

6 683 (0.65 %)

6 638 (0.91 %)

5 (0.01 %)

1 (0.03 %)

2011-06-16

old_Bibigon

71 981

5 500 (0.53 %)

5 440 (0.75 %)

12 (0.02 %)

2010-07-10

Topchev

77 224

4 753 (0.46 %)

4 508 (0.62 %)

41 (0.08 %)

2 (0.06 %)

2011-06-19

savsav

416 110

4 186 (0.40 %)

2 606 (0.36 %)

296 (0.61 %)

5 (0.16 %)

2011-06-27

dfcz55

414 565

4 020 (0.39 %)

3 145 (0.43 %)

175 (0.36 %)

2011-09-16

dedNikifor

142 776

3 933 (0.38 %)

2 178 (0.30 %)

327 (0.68 %)

6 (0.19 %)

2011-09-21

wasiliiterkin (Тюмень)

500 670

3 580 (0.35 %)

2 415 (0.33 %)

233 (0.48 %)

2011-09-09

Miroff

217 899

3 350 (0.32 %)

2 685 (0.37 %)

49 (0.10 %)

21 (0.66 %)

2011-09-24

s0nik

336 137

3 345 (0.32 %)

2 515 (0.34 %)

166 (0.34 %)

2010-11-18

sa235

196 901

3 119 (0.30 %)

1 979 (0.27 %)

228 (0.47 %)

2011-05-06

xamal

382 023

2 997 (0.29 %)

2 267 (0.31 %)

98 (0.20 %)

12 (0.38 %)

2011-07-18

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

2 832 (0.27 %)

2 277 (0.31 %)

23 (0.05 %)

22 (0.69 %)

2011-09-22

Andreyt

497 469

2 669 (0.26 %)

959 (0.13 %)

302 (0.62 %)

10 (0.32 %)

2011-09-25

Nexor

221 087

2 247 (0.22 %)

2 (0.00 %)

449 (0.93 %)

2011-04-12

Hind

79 836

2 160 (0.21 %)

108 (3.41 %)

2011-08-25

const_st

409 763

1 994 (0.19 %)

1 544 (0.21 %)

86 (0.18 %)

1 (0.03 %)

2011-09-14

monkeyuser

W H S

231 173

-1

1 772 (0.17 %)

1 032 (0.14 %)

148 (0.31 %)

2011-06-07

KekcuHa

30 590

1 736 (0.17 %)

1 566 (0.21 %)

34 (0.07 %)

2010-01-29

research72

442 130

1 729 (0.17 %)

344 (0.05 %)

277 (0.57 %)

2011-08-31

Ilis

127 170

1 674 (0.16 %)

1 219 (0.17 %)

79 (0.16 %)

3 (0.09 %)

2011-08-26

varelick

197 816

1 670 (0.16 %)

1 210 (0.17 %)

92 (0.19 %)

2011-07-15

Calixao

400 391

1 642 (0.16 %)

17 (0.00 %)

325 (0.67 %)

2011-09-07

Marker13

350 776

1 583 (0.15 %)

1 498 (0.21 %)

17 (0.04 %)

2011-03-04

vespex

97 421

1 499 (0.14 %)

1 214 (0.17 %)

29 (0.06 %)

7 (0.22 %)

2010-12-11

Проходимец

152 441

1 463 (0.14 %)

1 198 (0.16 %)

53 (0.11 %)

2011-02-22

trolleway

397 326

1 246 (0.12 %)

981 (0.13 %)

13 (0.03 %)

10 (0.32 %)

2011-09-23

Upliner

67 668

1 242 (0.12 %)

1 217 (0.17 %)

5 (0.01 %)

2009-02-27

Gordon2

W H S

218 558

1 225 (0.12 %)

1 075 (0.15 %)

22 (0.05 %)

2 (0.06 %)

2010-09-20

dkiselev

230 942

1 080 (0.10 %)

970 (0.13 %)

22 (0.05 %)

2011-08-15

Хмурый

447 276

1 051 (0.10 %)

641 (0.09 %)

74 (0.15 %)

2 (0.06 %)

2011-06-09

dnikitin

277 726

1 027 (0.10 %)

7 (0.00 %)

204 (0.42 %)

2011-04-12

Vaska72

90 436

983 (0.10 %)

943 (0.13 %)

8 (0.02 %)

2009-12-25

luch86

266 092

760 (0.07 %)

38 (1.20 %)

2011-05-03

demitel

148 239

695 (0.07 %)

370 (0.05 %)

65 (0.13 %)

2009-11-02

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

680 (0.07 %)

34 (1.07 %)

2011-07-23

Mir76

204 582

638 (0.06 %)

593 (0.08 %)

9 (0.02 %)

2011-03-21

glebius

94 786

620 (0.06 %)

180 (0.02 %)

72 (0.15 %)

4 (0.13 %)

2011-09-25

neutron

140 650

611 (0.06 %)

506 (0.07 %)

21 (0.04 %)

2011-03-15

theophrastos

96 069

560 (0.05 %)

112 (0.23 %)

2010-12-10

bp0106

204 596

500 (0.05 %)

25 (0.79 %)

2011-04-02

uboot

26 299

471 (0.05 %)

1 (0.00 %)

94 (0.19 %)

2011-01-16

Kostik

384 084

384 (0.04 %)

24 (0.00 %)

72 (0.15 %)

2011-08-25

lvv1960

135 138

260 (0.03 %)

13 (0.41 %)

2011-09-01

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.