OpenStreetMap ODbL acceptance and user ranks for the region of Ямало-Ненецкий автономный округ

If you want to ask a user about the ODbL:

First check if the user hasn’t accepted already by clicking on the „H“ next to the username on this page (because this stats are only updated once a week) and if nobody else has bothered the user before (see the list in the wiki)
check the OSM user page (click on the username on this page) and the wiki page of the user (click on the “W” next to the username on this page)
do a web search on discussions of the user about the ODbL (click on the “S” next to the username on this page)

Please write a friendly mail, asking if the user already knows about the licence change, where he could read more about the topic and how he could accept the licence.

Nodes
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	439 104 (89.15 %)	6 802 (1.38 %)	445 906 (90.53 %)
last edit	44 496 (9.03 %)	2 128 (0.43 %)	46 624 (9.47 %)
v1 + last edit	483 600 (98.19 %)	8 930 (1.81 %)	492 530 (100.00 %)

Ways
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	9 676 (56.86 %)	238 (1.40 %)	9 914 (58.26 %)
last edit	6 779 (39.84 %)	324 (1.90 %)	7 103 (41.74 %)
v1 + last edit	16 455 (96.70 %)	562 (3.30 %)	17 017 (100.00 %)

Relations
	ODbL	CC	ODbL + CC
v1	600 (77.82 %)	(0.00 %)	600 (77.82 %)
last edit	170 (22.05 %)	1 (0.13 %)	171 (22.18 %)
v1 + last edit	770 (99.87 %)	1 (0.13 %)	771 (100.00 %)

Contributors
	172 (94.51 %)	10 (5.49 %)	182 (100.00 %)

Legend
X

Y		Z

v1 means objects created and never modified (version 1) in this region
last edit means objects last edited (version > 1) in this region
ODbL means objects which were created or modified by users who have accepted the ODbL and CT.
CC means objects which were created or modified by users who have not accepted the ODbL and CT yet, that means these objects are licenced CC.

The new ODbL database will contain at least X and at most Y objects of present state (if the database change would be today). At the moment the database contains a total of Z objects.

Rank¹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46

Rank¹

User²	uid	ODbL³	OSM merit⁴	nodes⁵	ways⁵	relations⁵	last edit
Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):	94.51%		98.19%	96.70%	99.87%
Cos	234 385	1	136 948 (23.09 %)	125 833 (25.55 %)	2 203 (12.95 %)	5 (0.65 %)	2011-08-06
sim	35 247	1	136 082 (22.95 %)	129 962 (26.39 %)	1 208 (7.10 %)	4 (0.52 %)	2010-05-08
NTKe	368 134	1	97 372 (16.42 %)	87 417 (17.75 %)	1 931 (11.35 %)	15 (1.95 %)	2011-08-25
VitMar	430 151	1	37 633 (6.35 %)	21 303 (4.33 %)	3 266 (19.19 %)		2011-06-20
Aleksandr Dezhin	12 494	1	19 765 (3.33 %)	19 435 (3.95 %)	26 (0.15 %)	10 (1.30 %)	2011-08-26
AMDmi3	133 332	1	13 272 (2.24 %)	67 (0.01 %)	2 609 (15.33 %)	8 (1.04 %)	2011-08-18
MichaelCollinson	308	1	13 016 (2.19 %)	12 556 (2.55 %)	92 (0.54 %)		2009-01-10
dnikitin	277 726	1	11 128 (1.88 %)	5 303 (1.08 %)	1 161 (6.82 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2011-04-05
neutron	140 650	1	10 757 (1.81 %)	10 312 (2.09 %)	89 (0.52 %)		2010-03-22
katpatuka	17 497	1	10 290 (1.74 %)	9 885 (2.01 %)	73 (0.43 %)	2 (0.26 %)	2009-10-08
GoldenEyeOSM W H S	241 690	0	8 440 (1.42 %)	6 015 (1.22 %)	485 (2.85 %)		2010-08-24
Dennis Apter	180 462	1	7 740 (1.31 %)			387 (50.19 %)	2011-08-19
himik	49 910	1	6 321 (1.07 %)	3 391 (0.69 %)	586 (3.44 %)		2009-10-20
evg794	333 639	1	5 513 (0.93 %)	5 403 (1.10 %)	22 (0.13 %)		2010-08-24
ipodolsk	16 319	1	5 317 (0.90 %)	5 182 (1.05 %)	23 (0.14 %)	1 (0.13 %)	2010-01-24
jstein	31 319	1	4 614 (0.78 %)	3 974 (0.81 %)	80 (0.47 %)	12 (1.56 %)	2011-05-28
Проходимец	152 441	1	4 377 (0.74 %)	3 217 (0.65 %)	232 (1.36 %)		2011-01-21
griigoriok	504 980	1	4 151 (0.70 %)	1 551 (0.31 %)	520 (3.06 %)		2011-08-15
FrankT	29 017	1	4 139 (0.70 %)	3 259 (0.66 %)	176 (1.03 %)		2011-05-20
old_Bibigon	71 981	1	4 066 (0.69 %)	4 061 (0.82 %)	1 (0.01 %)		2010-05-18
Droll-a	411 286	1	3 283 (0.55 %)	2 238 (0.45 %)	209 (1.23 %)		2011-05-09
NAV	455 985	1	2 923 (0.49 %)	2 068 (0.42 %)	171 (1.00 %)		2011-08-16
JesperFj	258 878	1	2 616 (0.44 %)	2 006 (0.41 %)	122 (0.72 %)		2010-06-08
Marker13	350 776	1	2 347 (0.40 %)	2 147 (0.44 %)	40 (0.24 %)		2011-03-01
Andre Engels	4 054	1	2 206 (0.37 %)	1 916 (0.39 %)	58 (0.34 %)		2011-08-04
Hind	79 836	1	2 203 (0.37 %)	3 (0.00 %)	4 (0.02 %)	109 (14.14 %)	2011-08-25
PeterIto	4 951	1	2 139 (0.36 %)	2 134 (0.43 %)	1 (0.01 %)		2009-01-03
Z440	236 129	1	1 963 (0.33 %)	1 878 (0.38 %)	17 (0.10 %)		2010-05-15
SlayerS	485 231	1	1 906 (0.32 %)	1 216 (0.25 %)	138 (0.81 %)		2011-07-10
Oksion	60 769	1	1 782 (0.30 %)	1 447 (0.29 %)	47 (0.28 %)	5 (0.65 %)	2011-07-21
ALTAR1	485 049	1	1 631 (0.28 %)	1 066 (0.22 %)	113 (0.66 %)		2011-07-10
Upliner	67 668	1	1 616 (0.27 %)	1 466 (0.30 %)	30 (0.18 %)		2009-10-30
lexx78no	338 038	1	1 456 (0.25 %)	1 416 (0.29 %)	8 (0.05 %)		2010-08-27
AlRight	177 084	1	1 269 (0.21 %)	954 (0.19 %)	35 (0.21 %)	7 (0.91 %)	2011-05-15
glebius	94 786	1	1 160 (0.20 %)	505 (0.10 %)	107 (0.63 %)	6 (0.78 %)	2011-01-26
jkjk W H S	23 543	-1	1 153 (0.19 %)	978 (0.20 %)	35 (0.21 %)		2011-06-08
physgeo	92 561	1	1 039 (0.18 %)	449 (0.09 %)	118 (0.69 %)		2011-08-28
Castoutside	459 028	1	1 029 (0.17 %)	674 (0.14 %)	71 (0.42 %)		2011-05-25
Ilis	127 170	1	1 008 (0.17 %)	908 (0.18 %)	20 (0.12 %)		2010-11-09
INGA W H S	212 168	0	927 (0.16 %)	922 (0.19 %)	1 (0.01 %)		2010-01-10
alexfrol	12 184	1	896 (0.15 %)	571 (0.12 %)	65 (0.38 %)		2011-08-17
luch86	266 092	1	760 (0.13 %)			38 (4.93 %)	2011-05-03
tsvnv	137 570	1	731 (0.12 %)	691 (0.14 %)	8 (0.05 %)		2011-06-25
Alexandr Zeinalov	161 476	1	680 (0.11 %)			34 (4.41 %)	2011-07-23
bp0106	204 596	1	500 (0.08 %)			25 (3.24 %)	2011-04-02
lvv1960	135 138	1	260 (0.04 %)			13 (1.69 %)	2011-08-25

User²

uid

ODbL³

OSM merit⁴

nodes⁵

ways⁵

relations⁵

last edit

Total user/data ODbL acceptance rate (at last edit!):

94.51%

98.19%

96.70%

99.87%

Cos

234 385

136 948 (23.09 %)

125 833 (25.55 %)

2 203 (12.95 %)

5 (0.65 %)

2011-08-06

sim

35 247

136 082 (22.95 %)

129 962 (26.39 %)

1 208 (7.10 %)

4 (0.52 %)

2010-05-08

NTKe

368 134

97 372 (16.42 %)

87 417 (17.75 %)

1 931 (11.35 %)

15 (1.95 %)

2011-08-25

VitMar

430 151

37 633 (6.35 %)

21 303 (4.33 %)

3 266 (19.19 %)

2011-06-20

Aleksandr Dezhin

12 494

19 765 (3.33 %)

19 435 (3.95 %)

26 (0.15 %)

10 (1.30 %)

2011-08-26

AMDmi3

133 332

13 272 (2.24 %)

67 (0.01 %)

2 609 (15.33 %)

8 (1.04 %)

2011-08-18

MichaelCollinson

308

13 016 (2.19 %)

12 556 (2.55 %)

92 (0.54 %)

2009-01-10

dnikitin

277 726

11 128 (1.88 %)

5 303 (1.08 %)

1 161 (6.82 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2011-04-05

neutron

140 650

10 757 (1.81 %)

10 312 (2.09 %)

89 (0.52 %)

2010-03-22

katpatuka

17 497

10 290 (1.74 %)

9 885 (2.01 %)

73 (0.43 %)

2 (0.26 %)

2009-10-08

GoldenEyeOSM

W H S

241 690

8 440 (1.42 %)

6 015 (1.22 %)

485 (2.85 %)

2010-08-24

Dennis Apter

180 462

7 740 (1.31 %)

387 (50.19 %)

2011-08-19

himik

49 910

6 321 (1.07 %)

3 391 (0.69 %)

586 (3.44 %)

2009-10-20

evg794

333 639

5 513 (0.93 %)

5 403 (1.10 %)

22 (0.13 %)

2010-08-24

ipodolsk

16 319

5 317 (0.90 %)

5 182 (1.05 %)

23 (0.14 %)

1 (0.13 %)

2010-01-24

jstein

31 319

4 614 (0.78 %)

3 974 (0.81 %)

80 (0.47 %)

12 (1.56 %)

2011-05-28

Проходимец

152 441

4 377 (0.74 %)

3 217 (0.65 %)

232 (1.36 %)

2011-01-21

griigoriok

504 980

4 151 (0.70 %)

1 551 (0.31 %)

520 (3.06 %)

2011-08-15

FrankT

29 017

4 139 (0.70 %)

3 259 (0.66 %)

176 (1.03 %)

2011-05-20

old_Bibigon

71 981

4 066 (0.69 %)

4 061 (0.82 %)

1 (0.01 %)

2010-05-18

Droll-a

411 286

3 283 (0.55 %)

2 238 (0.45 %)

209 (1.23 %)

2011-05-09

NAV

455 985

2 923 (0.49 %)

2 068 (0.42 %)

171 (1.00 %)

2011-08-16

JesperFj

258 878

2 616 (0.44 %)

2 006 (0.41 %)

122 (0.72 %)

2010-06-08

Marker13

350 776

2 347 (0.40 %)

2 147 (0.44 %)

40 (0.24 %)

2011-03-01

Andre Engels

4 054

2 206 (0.37 %)

1 916 (0.39 %)

58 (0.34 %)

2011-08-04

Hind

79 836

2 203 (0.37 %)

3 (0.00 %)

4 (0.02 %)

109 (14.14 %)

2011-08-25

PeterIto

4 951

2 139 (0.36 %)

2 134 (0.43 %)

1 (0.01 %)

2009-01-03

Z440

236 129

1 963 (0.33 %)

1 878 (0.38 %)

17 (0.10 %)

2010-05-15

SlayerS

485 231

1 906 (0.32 %)

1 216 (0.25 %)

138 (0.81 %)

2011-07-10

Oksion

60 769

1 782 (0.30 %)

1 447 (0.29 %)

47 (0.28 %)

5 (0.65 %)

2011-07-21

ALTAR1

485 049

1 631 (0.28 %)

1 066 (0.22 %)

113 (0.66 %)

2011-07-10

Upliner

67 668

1 616 (0.27 %)

1 466 (0.30 %)

30 (0.18 %)

2009-10-30

lexx78no

338 038

1 456 (0.25 %)

1 416 (0.29 %)

8 (0.05 %)

2010-08-27

AlRight

177 084

1 269 (0.21 %)

954 (0.19 %)

35 (0.21 %)

7 (0.91 %)

2011-05-15

glebius

94 786

1 160 (0.20 %)

505 (0.10 %)

107 (0.63 %)

6 (0.78 %)

2011-01-26

jkjk

W H S

23 543

-1

1 153 (0.19 %)

978 (0.20 %)

35 (0.21 %)

2011-06-08

physgeo

92 561

1 039 (0.18 %)

449 (0.09 %)

118 (0.69 %)

2011-08-28

Castoutside

459 028

1 029 (0.17 %)

674 (0.14 %)

71 (0.42 %)

2011-05-25

Ilis

127 170

1 008 (0.17 %)

908 (0.18 %)

20 (0.12 %)

2010-11-09

INGA

W H S

212 168

927 (0.16 %)

922 (0.19 %)

1 (0.01 %)

2010-01-10

alexfrol

12 184

896 (0.15 %)

571 (0.12 %)

65 (0.38 %)

2011-08-17

luch86

266 092

760 (0.13 %)

38 (4.93 %)

2011-05-03

tsvnv

137 570

731 (0.12 %)

691 (0.14 %)

8 (0.05 %)

2011-06-25

Alexandr Zeinalov

161 476

680 (0.11 %)

34 (4.41 %)

2011-07-23

bp0106

204 596

500 (0.08 %)

25 (3.24 %)

2011-04-02

lvv1960

135 138

260 (0.04 %)

13 (1.69 %)

2011-08-25

¹) Rank is usually sorted by OSM merit⁴. You can click on the other values in the head of the table to sort it by nodes, ways etc.
²) Username with link to OSM user page, “W” links to wiki page of the user, “H” links to “How Did You Contribute” where you can find the most present state of licence acceptance, “S” links to search for discussions on ODbL related topic.
³) “1” means user has accepted ODbL and CT. “-1” means user does not like ODbL or CT. “0” means no decision yet ⇒ user should be informed. If you want to accept the new licence (ODbL) and Contributor Terms (CT) you can go here.
⁴) OSM merit is an artificial value which is calculated as follows by objects where the user was last editor: OSM merit = nodes × 1 + ways × 5 + relations × 20.
⁵) User was last editor of data.

This list was limited to users with at least 500 nodes, 65 ways or 10 relations.